148 research outputs found
Common aetiology for diverse language skills in 41/2-year-old twins
Multivariate genetic analysis was used to examine the genetic and environmental aetiology of the interrelationships of diverse linguistic skills. This study used data from a large sample of 4 1/2 year-old twins who were tested on measures assessing articulation, phonology, grammar, vocabulary, and verbal memory. Phenotypic analysis suggested two latent factors: articulation (2 measures) and general language (the remaining 7), and a genetic model incorporating these factors provided a good fit to the data. Almost all genetic and shared environmental influences on the 9 measures acted through the two latent factors. There was also substantial aetiological overlap between the two latent factors, with a genetic correlation of 0·64 and shared environment correlation of 1·00. We conclude that to a large extent, the same genetic and environmental factors underlie the development of individual differences in a wide range of linguistic skills
Early Predictors Of Creative Writing At Age 9
The present study investigated the extent to which creative expressiveness in writing at age 9 could
be predicted by early human figure drawing ability and general cognitive ability, measured at age 4.
Participants (N=277) were members of the Twins Early Development Study, for whom measures of
human figure drawing and general cognitive ability were available at age 4 and a measure of creative
writing was available at age 9. Creativity was measured with the Consensual Assessment Technique,
which is a commonly used technique to estimate creativity of a product. Each story, based on three
pictures shown to children, was coded on 10 dimensions by five independent judges. Creative
Expressiveness score was created as a composite measure of dimensions that correlated highly with
creativity dimension. Human figure drawing ability, measured by The Draw-A-Child test at 4, was found
to be a weak but significant predictor of Creative Expressiveness at age 9 (r =.17). General cognitive
ability at 4 did not predict Creative Expressiveness in writing at 9. It is concluded that examining
individual differences in human figure drawing ability may provide a promising direction for exploring
the early antecedents of creativity throughout childhood
Creative Storytelling In Childhood Is Related To Exam Performance At Age 16
Creativity is only partly recognised in education. A recent meta-analysis estimated a correlation
of r = 0.22 between creativity and educational achievement across many international student samples of
all educational levels. In the meta-analysis, creativity was measured with a variety of measures, including
divergent thinking and remote association tasks. The differences in the measures influenced the strength
of the relationship between creativity and educational achievement. More research is needed to establish
reliable measures of creativity, especially in primary school children, whose creativity remains poorly
evaluated. The present study measured creativity in written stories in children at age 9 using the
Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT). The study employed a longitudinal design, using CAT
creativity scores as a predictor of educational achievement at age 16. Each of the stories from 59 children
were coded by 6 different judges for 10 dimensions, including creativity. The inter-rater reliabilities
between the judges for the 10 dimensions were high (α = .76 - .95). Among the dimensions, a factor
analysis revealed two factors: Creative Expressiveness and Logic. The Creative Expressiveness factor
explained an additional 7 % of variance in English grades, but not in Maths, beyond intelligence, previous
achievement and personality traits associated with creativity. Overall, the study showed that CAT is a
robust and reliable measure to detect verbal creativity in childhood. The results also suggest that early
creativity predicts later academic achievement, calling for more attention to early creativity assessment
and development
Assessing Creative Expressiveness In Children's Written Stories Using The Consensual Assessment Technique
The study investigated methodological issues relating to the use of the Consensual Assessment
Technique (CAT) for measuring creativity in children’s written stories. The CAT is a commonly used
measure to estimate creativity of a product, based on social recognition of creativity by independent
judges. Across domains, the CAT has shown high inter-rater reliability. The present study utilised the
CAT to assess creativity in children’s written stories. The stories were also evaluated for: Imagination,
Novelty, Liking (how much the judges liked the story), Detail, Emotion, Vocabulary,
Straightforwardness, Logic and Grammar. The sample consisted of 277 nine-year-olds. The results
showed that to reach sufficient inter-rater reliability, 5 coders were needed. The results gave evidence of a
2-factor structure among the 10 dimensions, indexing ‘Creative Expressiveness’ and ‘Logic’ constructs
related to individual differences in writing. Girls outperformed boys on both constructs. The story length
was positively correlated with the constructs, explaining 63% of the variance in Creative Expressiveness,
and 42% in Logic. Creative Expressiveness was positively correlated with verbal ability (r = .20) and with
teacher rating of writing (r = .28). Similarly, Logic was also correlated with verbal ability (r = .34) and
teacher rating of writing (r = .44). The findings inform future research employing the CAT to measure
creativity in children’s storytelling
Gene-Environment Interaction in the Etiology of Mathematical Ability Using SNP Sets
Mathematics ability and disability is as heritable as other cognitive abilities and disabilities, however its genetic etiology has received relatively little attention. In our recent genome-wide association study of mathematical ability in 10-year-old children, 10 SNP associations were nominated from scans of pooled DNA and validated in an individually genotyped sample. In this paper, we use a ‘SNP set’ composite of these 10 SNPs to investigate gene-environment (GE) interaction, examining whether the association between the 10-SNP set and mathematical ability differs as a function of ten environmental measures in the home and school in a sample of 1888 children with complete data. We found two significant GE interactions for environmental measures in the home and the school both in the direction of the diathesis-stress type of GE interaction: The 10-SNP set was more strongly associated with mathematical ability in chaotic homes and when parents are negative
Preschool Verbal and Nonverbal Ability Mediate the Association Between Socioeconomic Status and School Performance
We compared the extent to which the long-term influence of family socioeconomic status (SES) on children's school performance from age 7 through 16 years was mediated by their preschool verbal and nonverbal ability. In 661 British children, who completed 17 researcher-administered ability tests at age 4.5 years, SES correlated more strongly with verbal than nonverbal ability (.39 vs.26). Verbal ability mediated about half of the association between SES and school performance at age 7, while nonverbal ability accounted for a third of the link. Only SES, but not verbal or nonverbal ability, was associated with changes in school performance from age 7 to 16. We found that SES-related differences in school performance are only partly transmitted through children's preschool verbal abilities
Genome-wide association study of receptive language ability of 12 year olds
Purpose: We have previously shown that individual differences in measures of receptive language ability at age 12 are highly heritable. The current study attempted to identify some of the genes responsible for the heritability of receptive language ability using a genome-wide association (GWA) approach.
Method: We administered four internet-based measures of receptive language (vocabulary, semantics, syntax, and pragmatics) to a sample of 2329 12-year-olds for whom DNA and genome-wide genotyping were available. Nearly 700,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and one million imputed SNPs were included in a GWA analysis of receptive language composite scores.
Results: No SNP associations met the demanding criterion of genome-wide significance that corrects for multiple testing across the genome (p < 5 ×10-8). The strongest SNP association did not replicate in an additional sample of 2639 12-year-olds.
Conclusion: These results indicate that individual differences in receptive language ability in the general population do not reflect common genetic variants that account for >3% of the phenotypic variance. The search for genetic variants associated with language skill will require larger samples and additional methods to identify and functionally characterize the full spectrum of risk variants
Brain correlates of non-symbolic numerosity estimation in low and high mathematical ability children
Previous studies have implicated several brain areas as subserving numerical approximation. Most studies have examined brain correlates of adult numerical approximation and have not considered individual differences in mathematical ability. The present study examined non-symbolic numerical approximation in two groups of 10-year-olds: Children with low and high mathematical ability. The aims of this study were to investigate the brain mechanisms associated with approximate numerosity in children and to assess whether individual differences in mathematical ability are associated with differential brain correlates during the approximation task. The results suggest that, similarly to adults, multiple and distributed brain areas are involved in approximation in children. Despite equal behavioral performance, there were differences in the brain activation patterns between low and high mathematical ability groups during the approximation task. This suggests that individual differences in mathematical ability are reflected in differential brain response during approximation
Attitudes towards genetic testing: The role of genetic literacy, motivated cognition, and socio-demographic characteristics
Understanding reasons for why people choose to have or not to have a genetic test is essential given the ever-increasing use of genetic technologies in everyday life. The present study explored the multiple drivers of people’s attitudes towards genetic testing. Using the International Genetic Literacy and Attitudes Survey (iGLAS), we collected data on: (1) willingness to undergo testing; (2) genetic literacy; (3) motivated cognition; and (4) demographic and cultural characteristics. The 37 variables were explored in the largest to-date sample of 4311 participants from diverse demographic and cultural backgrounds. The results showed that 82% of participants were willing to undergo genetic testing for improved treatment; and over 73%—for research. The 35 predictor variables together explained only a small proportion of variance: 7%—in the willingness to test for Treatment; and 6%—for Research. The strongest predictors of willingness to undergo genetic testing were genetic knowledge and deterministic beliefs. Concerns about data misuse and about finding out unwanted health-related information were weakly negatively associated with willingness to undergo genetic testing. We also found some differences in factors linked to attitudes towards genetic testing across the countries included in this study. Our study demonstrates that decision-making regarding genetic testing is influenced by a large number of potentially interacting factors. Further research into these factors may help consumers to make decisions regarding genetic testing that are right for their specific circumstances. Copyright: © 2023 Likhanov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Maths Anxiety Does Not Moderate the Link Between Spatial and Maths Ability
Spatial ability (SA) is known to be closely related to mathematical ability (Tosto et al., 2014). Maths anxiety (MA) has been shown to affect both mathematical and spatial ability (Maloney, 2011). The present study investigated the relationship between maths performance and spatial ability, as well as the effects of MA and gender on the association between them. General cognitive ability and trait anxiety were added as control variables. Data were collected from 146 twins (32% males) aged 17-33. Maths performance was measured with Problem Verification Task (PVT). SA was measured with Mental rotation task. MA was measured with sMARS questionnaire. General cognitive ability was measured with Raven’s matrices. Trait anxiety was measured with Spielberger anxiety rating scale. There were no correlations between SA and maths performance, except a negative correlation between SA and PVT reaction time variance. MA did not moderate the association between SA and maths performance. Interestingly, the interaction term between trait anxiety and SA was significant as a predictor for PVT reaction time. Posthoc analysis showed that higher spatial ability was associated with lower reaction time in PVT for high trait anxiety individuals only. Neither main effects of gender and maths anxiety, nor the interaction term between them were significant while predicting spatial ability. Altogether, our results indicate that the interplay between anxiety and mathematical cognition is complex and requires further research
- …