62 research outputs found

    Post-intervention Status in Patients With Refractory Myasthenia Gravis Treated With Eculizumab During REGAIN and Its Open-Label Extension

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether eculizumab helps patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor-positive (AChR+) refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) achieve the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status of minimal manifestations (MM), we assessed patients' status throughout REGAIN (Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in AChR+ Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis) and its open-label extension. METHODS: Patients who completed the REGAIN randomized controlled trial and continued into the open-label extension were included in this tertiary endpoint analysis. Patients were assessed for the MGFA post-intervention status of improved, unchanged, worse, MM, and pharmacologic remission at defined time points during REGAIN and through week 130 of the open-label study. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients completed REGAIN and continued into the open-label study (eculizumab/eculizumab: 56; placebo/eculizumab: 61). At week 26 of REGAIN, more eculizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved a status of improved (60.7% vs 41.7%) or MM (25.0% vs 13.3%; common OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.5). After 130 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 88.0% of patients achieved improved status and 57.3% of patients achieved MM status. The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with its known profile and no new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSION: Eculizumab led to rapid and sustained achievement of MM in patients with AChR+ refractory gMG. These findings support the use of eculizumab in this previously difficult-to-treat patient population. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: REGAIN, NCT01997229; REGAIN open-label extension, NCT02301624. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that, after 26 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 25.0% of adults with AChR+ refractory gMG achieved MM, compared with 13.3% who received placebo

    Minimal Symptom Expression' in Patients With Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody-Positive Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treated With Eculizumab

    Get PDF
    The efficacy and tolerability of eculizumab were assessed in REGAIN, a 26-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR+) refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), and its open-label extension

    Essays on budgetary allocation and investment decisions for public goods

    No full text
    This dissertation consists of two essays which study budgetary allocation and investment decisions for public goods. Chapter 1 investigates theoretically and empirically how a legislature allocates a budget to fund local public projects in an omnibus bill under unanimous agreement. While legislatures typically use majority rule to allocate a given budget in distributive legislation, near-unanimous consent over the broad allocation of benefits is pervasive. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as universalism.\u27\u27 I develop a game-theoretic model where heterogeneous players strategically interact in a universal coalition to determine allocations, with non-cooperative bargaining as a threat point for the breakdown of cooperation. I structurally estimate the model to quantify the effects of political power and actual needs on the agreed-upon allocation. Moreover, I analyze two types of misallocations which can arise—political power in the legislature can distort budgetary allocations geographically, and money can be allocated toward projects which are inefficient given a budgetary allocation. In the empirical application, I construct a unique dataset using a specific bill called the Bridge Bill Capital Budget\u27\u27 in 1992, which is an omnibus of grants for replacement and repair of bridges in Pennsylvania. I find that 19.5% of the aggregate budget would be allocated differently across counties if allocations were determined only based on actual needs. However, I find that political importance of bridges has smaller distortion on the choice of bridges selected for grants within counties. In Chapter 2, I develop and estimate a dynamic stochastic discrete choice model to study the optimal timing for replacement of bridges. I use an equilibrium concept in which the transition of the stock of bridges generates self-fulfilling expectations of the engineer. Using the National Bridge Inventory data to estimate the model, the empirical findings suggest that the state and expected evolution of the aggregate stock attributes as well as technical characteristics of individual bridges affect maintenance decisions

    Essays on budgetary allocation and investment decisions for public goods

    No full text
    This dissertation consists of two essays which study budgetary allocation and investment decisions for public goods. Chapter 1 investigates theoretically and empirically how a legislature allocates a budget to fund local public projects in an omnibus bill under unanimous agreement. While legislatures typically use majority rule to allocate a given budget in distributive legislation, near-unanimous consent over the broad allocation of benefits is pervasive. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as universalism.\u27\u27 I develop a game-theoretic model where heterogeneous players strategically interact in a universal coalition to determine allocations, with non-cooperative bargaining as a threat point for the breakdown of cooperation. I structurally estimate the model to quantify the effects of political power and actual needs on the agreed-upon allocation. Moreover, I analyze two types of misallocations which can arise—political power in the legislature can distort budgetary allocations geographically, and money can be allocated toward projects which are inefficient given a budgetary allocation. In the empirical application, I construct a unique dataset using a specific bill called the Bridge Bill Capital Budget\u27\u27 in 1992, which is an omnibus of grants for replacement and repair of bridges in Pennsylvania. I find that 19.5% of the aggregate budget would be allocated differently across counties if allocations were determined only based on actual needs. However, I find that political importance of bridges has smaller distortion on the choice of bridges selected for grants within counties. In Chapter 2, I develop and estimate a dynamic stochastic discrete choice model to study the optimal timing for replacement of bridges. I use an equilibrium concept in which the transition of the stock of bridges generates self-fulfilling expectations of the engineer. Using the National Bridge Inventory data to estimate the model, the empirical findings suggest that the state and expected evolution of the aggregate stock attributes as well as technical characteristics of individual bridges affect maintenance decisions

    Waiting to be built: A duration analysis of public works’ procedure

    No full text
    corecore