Interpreting big-data analysis of retrospective observational data

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

The Application of Genetic Risk Scores in Rheumatic Diseases: A Perspective

\ua9 2023 by the authors.Modest effect sizes have limited the clinical applicability of genetic associations with rheumatic diseases. Genetic risk scores (GRSs) have emerged as a promising solution to translate genetics into useful tools. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent literature on GRSs in rheumatic diseases. We describe six categories for which GRSs are used: (a) disease (outcome) prediction, (b) genetic commonalities between diseases, (c) disease differentiation, (d) interplay between genetics and environmental factors, (e) heritability and transferability, and (f) detecting causal relationships between traits. In our review of the literature, we identified current lacunas and opportunities for future work. First, the shortage of non-European genetic data restricts the application of many GRSs to European populations. Next, many GRSs are tested in settings enriched for cases that limit the transferability to real life. If intended for clinical application, GRSs are ideally tested in the relevant setting. Finally, there is much to elucidate regarding the co-occurrence of clinical traits to identify shared causal paths and elucidate relationships between the diseases. GRSs are useful instruments for this. Overall, the ever-continuing research on GRSs gives a hopeful outlook into the future of GRSs and indicates significant progress in their potential applications

Using an artificial intelligence tool incorporating natural language processing to identify patients with a diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis in electronic health records

Background: Because anti-neutrophil cytoplasmatic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a rare, lifethreatening, auto-immune disease, conducting research is difficult but essential. A long-lasting challenge is to identify rare AAV patients within the electronic-health-record (EHR)-system to facilitate real-world research. Artificial intelligence (AI)-search tools using natural language processing (NLP) for text-mining are increasingly postulated as a solution.Methods: We employed an AI-tool that combined text-mining with NLP-based exclusion, to accurately identify rare AAV patients within large EHR-systems (>2.000.000 records). We developed an identification method in an academic center with an established AAV-training set (n = 203) and validated the method in a non-academic center with an AAV-validation set (n = 84). To assess accuracy anonymized patient records were manually reviewed.Results: Based on an iterative process, a text-mining search was developed on disease description, laboratory measurements, medication and specialisms. In the training center, 608 patients were identified with a sensitivity of 97.0 % (95%CI [93.7, 98.9]) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 56.9 % (95%CI [52.9, 60.1]). NLP-based exclusion resulted in 444 patients increasing PPV to 77.9 % (95%CI [73.7, 81.7]) while sensitivity remained 96.3 % (95%CI [93.8, 98.0]). In the validation center, text-mining identified 333 patients (sensitivity 97.6 % (95%CI [91.6, 99.7]), PPV 58.2 % (95%CI [52.8, 63.6])) and NLP-based exclusion resulted in 223 patients, increasing PPV to 86.1 % (95%CI [80.9, 90.4]) with 98.0 % (95%CI [94.9, 99.4]) sensitivity. Our identification method outperformed ICD-10-coding predominantly in identifying MPO+ and organ-limited AAV patients.Conclusions: Our study highlights the advantages of implementing AI, notably NLP, to accurately identify rare AAV patients within large EHR-systems and demonstrates the applicability and transportability. Therefore, this method can reduce efforts to identify AAV patients and accelerate real-world research, while avoiding bias by ICD-10-coding.Nephrolog

The application of genetic risk scores in rheumatic diseases: a perspective

Modest effect sizes have limited the clinical applicability of genetic associations with rheumatic diseases. Genetic risk scores (GRSs) have emerged as a promising solution to translate genetics into useful tools. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent literature on GRSs in rheumatic diseases. We describe six categories for which GRSs are used: (a) disease (outcome) prediction, (b) genetic commonalities between diseases, (c) disease differentiation, (d) interplay between genetics and environmental factors, (e) heritability and transferability, and (f) detecting causal relationships between traits. In our review of the literature, we identified current lacunas and opportunities for future work. First, the shortage of non-European genetic data restricts the application of many GRSs to European populations. Next, many GRSs are tested in settings enriched for cases that limit the transferability to real life. If intended for clinical application, GRSs are ideally tested in the relevant setting. Finally, there is much to elucidate regarding the co-occurrence of clinical traits to identify shared causal paths and elucidate relationships between the diseases. GRSs are useful instruments for this. Overall, the ever-continuing research on GRSs gives a hopeful outlook into the future of GRSs and indicates significant progress in their potential applications.Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

Population-based user-perceived experience of Rheumatic?: a novel digital symptom-checker in rheumatology

Objective: Digital symptom-checkers (SCs) have potential to improve rheumatology triage and reduce diagnostic delays. In addition to being accurate, SCs should be user friendly and meet patient's needs. Here, we examined usability and acceptance of Rheumatic?-a new and freely available online SC (currently with >44 000 users)-in a real-world setting. Methods: Study participants were recruited from an ongoing prospective study, and included people >= 18 years with musculoskeletal complaints completing Rheumatic? online. The user experience survey comprised five usability and acceptability questions (11-point rating scale), and an open-ended question regarding improvement of Rheumatic? Data were analysed in R using t-test or Wilcoxon rank test (group comparisons), or linear regression (continuous variables). Results: A total of 12 712 people completed the user experience survey. The study population had a normal age distribution, with a peak at 50-59 years, and 78% women. A majority found Rheumatic? useful (78%), thought the questionnaire gave them an opportunity to describe their complaints well (76%), and would recommend Rheumatic? to friends and other patients (74%). Main shortcoming was that 36% thought there were too many questions. Still, 39% suggested more detailed questions, and only 2% suggested a reduction of questions.Conclusion: Based on real-world data from the largest user evaluation study of a digital SC in rheumatology, we conclude that Rheumatic? is well accepted by women and men with rheumatic complaints, in all investigated age groups. Wide-scale adoption of Rheumatic?, therefore, seems feasible, with promising scientific and clinical implications on the horizon.Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

Handwork vs machine: a comparison of rheumatoid arthritis patient populations as identified from EHR free-text by diagnosis extraction through machine-learning or traditional criteria-based chart review

Background Electronic health records (EHRs) offer a wealth of observational data. Machine-learning (ML) methods are efficient at data extraction, capable of processing the information-rich free-text physician notes in EHRs. The clinical diagnosis contained therein represents physician expert opinion and is more consistently recorded than classification criteria components. Objectives To investigate the overlap and differences between rheumatoid arthritis patients as identified either from EHR free-text through the extraction of the rheumatologist diagnosis using machine-learning (ML) or through manual chart-review applying the 1987 and 2010 RA classification criteria. Methods Since EHR initiation, 17,662 patients have visited the Leiden rheumatology outpatient clinic. For ML, we used a support vector machine (SVM) model to identify those who were diagnosed with RA by their rheumatologist. We trained and validated the model on a random selection of 2000 patients, balancing PPV and sensitivity to define a cutoff, and assessed performance on a separate 1000 patients. We then deployed the model on our entire patient selection (including the 3000). Of those, 1127 patients had both a 1987 and 2010 EULAR/ACR criteria status at 1 year after inclusion into the local prospective arthritis cohort. In these 1127 patients, we compared the patient characteristics of RA cases identified with ML and those fulfilling the classification criteria. Results The ML model performed very well in the independent test set (sensitivity=0.85, specificity=0.99, PPV=0.86, NPV=0.99). In our selection of patients with both EHR and classification information, 373 were recognized as RA by ML and 357 and 426 fulfilled the 1987 or 2010 criteria, respectively. Eighty percent of the ML-identified cases fulfilled at least one of the criteria sets. Both demographic and clinical parameters did not differ between the ML extracted cases and those identified with EULAR/ACR classification criteria. Conclusions With ML methods, we enable fast patient extraction from the huge EHR resource. Our ML algorithm accurately identifies patients diagnosed with RA by their rheumatologist. This resulting group of RA patients had a strong overlap with patients identified using the 1987 or 2010 classification criteria and the baseline (disease) characteristics were comparable. ML-assisted case labeling enables high-throughput creation of inclusive patient selections for research purposes.Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

Disease progression in systemic sclerosis

Cardiolog