11 research outputs found

    Hepatic lipid peroxidation and cytochrome P-450 2E1 in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its subtypes

    Get PDF
    GOAL: To compare hepatic lipid peroxidation and cytochrome P-450 2E1 (CYP2E1) protein content in liver biopsies from children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 2 control groups. BACKGROUND: Elevated hepatic lipid peroxidation resulting from increased hepatic CYP2E1 enzyme activity is involved in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in adults, but studies in children are lacking. STUDY: Liver biopsies from 59 children with NAFLD (49 with NASH), 10 children with normal liver histology, and 9 children with mild chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection were examined. Hepatic malondialdehyde (a measure of lipid peroxidation) levels and CYP2E1 protein content were quantitated, as a percentage of the total area, by immunohistochemical staining of liver biopsy material followed by digital image quantitation. RESULTS: Lipid peroxidation was significantly greater in NAFLD liver biopsies (46.7 ± 20.8%) compared with biopsies from children with normal liver histology (7.6 ± 9.4%; P<0.001) or HCV infection (7.7 ± 7.6%; P<0.001). However, hepatic CYP2E1 expression was not different across the NAFLD, normal liver histology, and HCV groups (60.7 ± 8.7%, 53.5 ± 10.7%, and 60.0 ± 11.9%, respectively; P=0.116). Among children with NAFLD, lipid peroxidation and CYP2E1 protein content did not differ between biopsies with and without NASH. Body mass index was independently associated with hepatic lipid peroxidation levels (r=0.549; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic lipid peroxidation is increased in children with NAFLD but this is not related to hepatic CYP2E1 expression. No difference in lipid peroxidation in pediatric NAFLD versus NASH argues against a role in disease progression

    Fostering Leadership in a Student-Run Free Clinic Medical Executive Board and Across Interdisciplinary Partners.

    Get PDF
    Background: Being a member of a healthcare executive board requires a unique sense of resolve and passion for service. Not only are these leaders operating a student-run free clinic, but they are also full-time professional students while balancing extracurricular activities to discern their healthcare vocation. Board members feel pulled in many directions, resulting in imposter syndrome and possibly untapped leadership potential. Leadership succumbing to this pressure in 2021 might have resulted in the permanent closure or dysfunction of a clinic after COVID-19 required closure for one year. This study will discuss the interventions employed by the clinic’s Chair, Vice-Chair, Women’s Health co-chairs, and Operations chair to overcome the burden felt when faced with reopening a large, interdisciplinary, free clinic serving approximately 34 patients per weekly clinic day. Though fostering interpersonal relationships best encompasses the theme with which the above leaders encouraged hope during a time of global suffering, relationships were encouraged through multiple discrete interventions forming camaraderie and trust within and between interdisciplinary executive boards. Interventions: Medical Executive Board: In anticipation of the added pressures of reopening the clinic amid COVID-19, the Chair took special care to create a culture of collegiality and mutual vulnerability by facilitating various ways to ‘check-in’ with her board. She hosted preterm and midterm check-ins with each leader to discuss their vision for their role on the board. The Chair and Chair-elect also hosted the clinic’s first annual leadership retreat to support each member in finding their leadership style, and in turn, becoming familiar with their colleagues’ leadership styles. The Chair and Chair-elect will also perform exit interviews with all graduating board members. Partners: Reopening during the pandemic meant reorganizing the entire clinic flow and limiting the number of volunteers present. As a result, many interdisciplinary partners could not participate in the initial reopening and had to be brought in slowly throughout the year. Partner participation was encouraged by monthly meetings with all partners (regardless of clinical presence), and an active group chat with leaders. The Vice-Chair also emphasized alternate means of participation. Some partners organized winter clothes and food drives, while others fundraised for the clinic. All partners were encouraged to develop telehealth plans. The fall partners’ retreat fostered community, during which all partners brainstormed 2022 goals. Results/Conclusion: Medical Executive Board: As a result of the above interventions, clinic leadership not only reopened the free clinic but fulfilled many years-long goals, which include rolling out a weekday telehealth protocol, serving record numbers of patients during a time of immense need, publishing the inaugural clinic-wide monthly newsletter, and formulating the clinic’s first-ever mistreatment policy. The leadership retreat inspired our Women’s Health Coalition to host a retreat; a check-in with the Women’s Health chair led to a midterm co-chair election to sustain the coalition long-term. Finally, the Operations chair spearheaded changes to clinic flow to avoid COVID-19 outbreaks–in doing so, she inspired a record turnout for this position at the 2022 elections. Partners: By the end of 2021, all interdisciplinary partners had resumed in-person care. However, the regular monthly meetings, alternate projects, and retreats fostered community and interest in the clinics even when all could not physically participate

    Evaluation of telemental health services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial

    No full text
    Abstract Background Roughly 40% of those with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD) have mental health needs, twice the national average. Unfortunately, outpatient mental health services are often inaccessible, increasing reliance on hospital-based services. While telemental health services hold potential to address this gap, little is known about the effectiveness of telemental health for the diversity of persons with IDD, especially as it relates to crisis prevention and intervention services. Accordingly, the aims of this study are to: (1) compare telemental health versus in-person crisis prevention and intervention services among people with IDD; and (2) understand if outcomes vary across subpopulations, in order to identify potential disparities. Methods This study will take place within START (Systemic, Therapeutic, Assessment, Resources, and Treatment), a national evidence-based model of mental health crisis prevention and intervention for people with IDD. A total of 500 youth and adults, located across nine states, will be randomized 1:1 to telemental health vs. in-person. Participant inclusion criteria are ages 12–45 years, living in a family setting, and newly enrolled (within 90 days) to START. Outcomes will be assessed, using a non-inferiority design, for up to 1 year or until discharge. The intervention is comprised of four components: (1) outreach; (2) consultation/coping skills; (3) intake/assessment; and, (4) 24-hour crisis response. The in-person condition will deliver all components in-person. The telemental health condition will deliver components 1 & 2, via telephonic or other communication technology, and components 3 & 4 in-person. Outcomes include mental health crisis contacts, mental health symptoms, emergency psychiatric service use, perceived quality of mental healthcare, and time to discharge. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first trial of a telemental health crisis program for the IDD population. The study will be executed by an interdisciplinary team of experts that includes persons with lived experience of disability. Understanding the benefits of specific telemental health methods has important implications to the design of interventions. This telemental health study offers promise to address disparities in access to mental health care for people with IDD across diverse racial, ethnic, linguistic, and cultural groups. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov ( #NCT05336955 ; Registration Date: 4/20/2022)

    In Children With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed Release Improves Liver Enzymes but Does Not Reduce Disease Activity Scores

    No full text
    Background &amp; aimsNo treatment for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been approved by regulatory agencies. We performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether 52 weeks of cysteamine bitartrate delayed release (CBDR) reduces the severity of liver disease in children with NAFLD.MethodsWe performed a double-masked trial of 169 children with NAFLD activity scores of 4 or higher at 10&nbsp;centers. From June 2012 to January 2014, the patients were assigned randomly to receive CBDR or placebo twice daily (300 mg for patients weighing ≀65 kg, 375 mg for patients weighing &gt;65 to 80 kg, and 450 mg for patients weighing &gt;80 kg) for 52&nbsp;weeks. The primary outcome from the intention-to-treat analysis was improvement in liver histology over 52 weeks, defined as a decrease in the NAFLD activity score of 2 points or more without worsening fibrosis; patients without biopsy specimens from week 52 (17 in the CBDR group and 6 in the placebo group) were considered nonresponders. We calculated the relative risks (RR) of improvement using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis.ResultsThere was no significant difference between groups in the primary outcome (28% of children in the CBDR group vs 22% in the placebo group; RR, 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-2.1; P&nbsp;= .34). However, children receiving CBDR had significant changes in&nbsp;prespecified secondary outcomes: reduced mean levels of&nbsp;alanine aminotransferase (reduction, 53 ± 88 U/L vs 8 ± 77 U/L in the placebo group; P&nbsp;= .02) and aspartate aminotransferase (reduction, 31 ± 52 vs 4 ± 36 U/L in the placebo group; P&nbsp;= .008), and a larger proportion had reduced lobular inflammation (36% in the CBDR group vs 21% in the placebo group; RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P&nbsp;= .03). In a post hoc analysis of children weighing 65 kg or less, those taking CBDR had a 4-fold better chance of histologic improvement (observed in 50% of children in the CBDR group vs 13% in the placebo group; RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.3-12.3; P&nbsp;= .005).ConclusionsIn a randomized trial, we found that 1 year of CBDR did not reduce overall histologic markers of NAFLD compared with placebo in children. Children receiving CBDR, however, had significant reductions in serum aminotransferase levels and lobular inflammation. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01529268

    Total Serum Bilirubin within 3 Months of Hepatoportoenterostomy Predicts Short-Term Outcomes in Biliary Atresia

    No full text
    corecore