Direct interactions between Epstein–Barr virus leader protein LP and the EBNA2 acidic domain underlie coordinate transcriptional regulation

The Epstein–Barr virus nuclear leader protein LP (EBNALP) and EBNA2 are expressed first in lymphocyte infection, coordinately regulate cell and viral gene transcription, and are critical for lymphocyte outgrowth into lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). We have now found that EBNALP readily associated with EBNA2 or with the EBNA2 C-terminal acidic activation domain (E2AD) when both components were expressed by bacteria. In lymphoblasts, EBNALP and EBNA2 did not stably associate. However, EBNALP deleted for only 10 C-terminal amino acids stably associated with EBNA2 in lymphoblasts or with EBNA2 acidic activating domain from bacteria. The E2AD was essential for EBNALP coactivation of the latent membrane protein 1 promoter in lymphoblasts; EBNALP could coactivate with a deficient mutant EBNA2, EBNA2W(454)T, but not with EBNA2 deleted for E2AD. Moreover, EBNALP 31 amino acids (dW2Y1) with 24 C- or N-terminal amino acids was a specific and efficient affinity matrix for EBNA2 or EBNALP. Even an EBNALP 22-aa peptide, dW2, specifically bound EBNALP or EBNA2. These biochemical interactions between EBNALP and EBNA2 enable coordinated transcriptional regulation of cell and viral gene expression in lymphoblasts only when the interaction is unstable; deletion of the EBNALP C-terminal 10 aa stabilized association with EBNA2 and prevented coactivation. Because EBNALPd10 dominantly inhibited EBNALP coactivation with EBNA2, EBNALPd10 expression in LCLs may be useful in assessing the role of EBNALP coactivation in LCL growth or survival

Hepatitis C virus infection in the immunocompromised host: a complex scenario with variable clinical impact

<p>Abstract</p> <p>The relationship between Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection and immunosuppression is complex and multifaceted. Although HCV-related hepatocytolysis is classically interpreted as secondary to the attack by cytotoxic T lymphocytes against infected cells, the liver disease is usually exacerbated and more rapidly evolutive in immunosuppressed patients. This generally occurs during the immunosuppression state, and not at the reconstitution of the host response after immunosuppressive therapy discontinuation. The field of immunosuppression and HCV infection is complicated both by the different outcome observed in different situations and/or by contrasting data obtained in the same conditions, with several still unanswered questions, such as the opportunity to modify treatment schedules in the setting of post-transplant follow-up. The complexity of this field is further complicated by the intrinsic tendency of HCV infection in itself to lead to disorders of the immune system. This review will briefly outline the current knowledge about the pathogenesis of both hepatic and extrahepatic HCV-related disorders and the principal available data concerning HCV infection in a condition of impairment of the immune system. Attention will be especially focused on some conditions - liver or kidney transplantation, the use of biologic drugs and cancer chemotherapy - for which more abundant and interesting data exist.</p