Transanal total mesorectal excision after incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection for early-stage low rectal cancer : A small case series

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal cancer is challenging but is gradually being performed worldwide. It is less invasive than surgical resection and can be performed on lesions in which malignancy cannot be diagnosed. In low rectal cancers, changes such as scarring after ESD may make it challenging to preserve the anus when additional surgical resection is required. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a novel surgical technique involving transanal endoscopic manipulation. It is useful for lesions in the deep pelvis near the anus. Herein, we report six cases of TaTME after ESD for early-stage low rectal cancer that resulted in incomplete resection. As a representative case, a 77-year-old female was referred to our hospital, and colonos-copy revealed low rectal cancer. ESD was performed, and the pathological diagnosis was an invasion of the submucosal layer and microscopic lymphovascular invasion. We performed an additional laparoscopic low anterior resection with TaTME. Lymph node metastasis was observed, and the final diagnosis was pT1b, pN1a, pStage IIIa, and R0. In other cases, the anus can also be preserved, and the distal margin can be secured. TaTME enabled anal preservation without being affected by the ESD scars. It is considered useful for additional resection after ESD of low rectal cancer

Inguinal single-port approach of endoscopic component separation for abdominal wall defects: A case series

Background: The component separation (CS) technique is widely used for abdominal wall defects, particularly in infected wounds. CS is associated with many wound complications due to subcutaneous blood flow disturbance. Endoscopic component separation (ECS) has fewer wound complications compared to CS and has been per-formed recently. However, there are various port required placements for ECS, and this technique requires proficiency. One approach for ECS is the inguinal single-port approach, which can be performed from an inguinal incision similar to that used in open surgery for inguinal hernias.Case presentation: We performed ECS with an inguinal single-port approach in three older adults. All patients had abdominal wall defects with infection at the central abdominal wound site. A 2-3-cm incision was created in the middle of the inguinal ligament, and a single-port surgical device with two 5-mm trocars was placed in the incision. The external oblique muscle was separated from the internal oblique muscle, and the external oblique aponeurosis was released. The muscle flap of the abdominal wall was moved to the central line. Tension-free abdominal wall closure was possible using a one-handed approach.Conclusions: ECS, which has fewer wound complications, requires proficiency. This procedure is a simple and easy-to-perform procedure using an inguinal incision that surgeons are familiar with

Elemental Diet in Lap Colon

Purpose: An amino acid-containing elemental diet (ED) does not require digestion for nutritional absorption, making it a good option for patients with gastrointestinal malabsorption. We conducted a randomized trial to confirm that perioperative ED enhanced the recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Methods: Patients in the intervention arm received commercially available ED from the day prior to surgery until postoperative day (POD) 3, whereas patients in the control group received a conventional perioperative diet program. To verify the endpoints, "estimated minimum length of stay in hospital after surgery" (emLOS) was defined as the number of days necessary to reach all the five criteria; namely, "sufficient oral intake", "sufficient pain control", "withdrawal of intravenous alimentation", "no abnormal findings in routine examinations", and "no rise in fever". Results: A total of 102 patients were randomized, 94 of whom were analyzed (ED 45, control 49). There was no morbidity or mortality. Shorter emLOS (POD 4 vs. POD 7; p = 0.018), earlier resumption of sufficient oral intake (POD 3 vs. POD 4; p = 0.034) and faster recovery to defecation (2.2 vs. 3.1 days; p = 0.005) were observed in the ED group vs. the control group. Conclusions: The perioperative ingestion of ED by patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy is safe and can reduce the postoperative hospital stay by supporting the acceleration of oral intake