11 research outputs found
In-depth investigation of the molecular pathogenesis of bladder cancer in a unique 26-year old patient with extensive multifocal disease: A case report
Background. The molecular characteristics and the clinical disease course of bladder cancer (BC) in young patients remain largely unresolved. All patients are monitored according to an intensive surveillance protocol and we aim to gain more insight into the molecular pathways of bladder tumors in young patients that could ultimately contribute to patient stratification, improve patient quality of life and reduce associated costs. We also determined whether a biomarker-based surveillance could be feasible. Case Presentation. We report a unique case of a 26-year-old Caucasian male with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder tumors occurring at a high frequency and analyzed multiple tumors (maximal pTaG2) and urine samples of this patient. Analysis included FGFR3 mutation detection, FGFR3 and TP53 immunohistochemistry, mircosatellite analysis of markers on chromosomes 8, 9, 10, 11 and 17 and a genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism-array (SNP). All analyzed tumors contained a mutation in FGFR3 and were associated with FGFR3 overexpression. None of the tumors showed overexpression of TP53. We found a deletion on chromosome 9 in the primary tumor and this was confirmed by the SNP-array that showed regions of loss on chromosome 9. Detection of all recurrences was possible by urinary FGFR3 mutation analysis. Conclusions. Our findings would suggest that the BC disease course is determined by not only a patient's age, but also by the molecular characteristics of a tumor. This young patient contained typical genetic changes found in tumors of older patients and implies a clinical disease course comparable to older patients. We demonstrate that FGFR3 mutation analysis on voided urine is a simple non-invasive method and could serve as a feasible follow-up approach for this young patient presenting with an FGFR3 mutant tumor
Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations in bladder cancer: High frequency across stages, detection in urine, and lack of association with outcome
Background Hotspot mutations in the promoter of the gene coding for telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) have been described and proposed to activate gene expression. Objectives To investigate TERT mutation frequency, spectrum, association with expression and clinical outcome, and potential for detection of recurrences in urine in patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). D
Validation of a DNA methylation-mutation urine assay to select patients with hematuria for cystoscopy
Purpose: Only 3% to 28% of patients referred to the urology clinic for hematuria are diagnosed with bladder cancer. Cystoscopy leads to high diagnostic costs and a high patient burden. Therefore, to improve the selection of patients for cystoscopy and reduce costs and over testing we aimed to validate a recently developed diagnostic urine assay.
Materials and Methods: Included in study were 200 patients from a total of 3 European countries who underwent cystoscopy for hematuria, including 97 with bladder cancer and 103 with nonmalignant findings. Voided urine samples were collected prior to cystoscopy. DNA was extracted and analyzed for mutations in FGFR3, TERT and HRAS, and methylation of OTX1, ONECUT2 and TWIST1. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association between predictor variables and bladder cancer.
Results: Combining the methylation and mutation markers with age led to an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI 0.92e0.99) with 93% sensitivity and 86% specificity, and an optimism corrected AUC of 0.95. The AUC was higher for T1 or greater tumors compared to Ta tumors (0.99 vs 0.93). The AUC was also higher for high grade tumors compared to low grade tumors (1.00 vs 0.93). Overall negative predictive value was 99% based on the 5% to 10% prevalence of bladder cancer in patients with hematuria. This would lead to a 77% reduction in diagnostic cystoscopy.
Conclusions: Analyzing hematuria patients for the risk of bladder cancer using novel molecular markers may lead to a reduction in diagnostic cystoscopy. Combining methylation analysis (OTX1, ONECUT2 and TWIST1) with mutation analysis (FGFR3, TERT and HRAS) and patient age resulted in a validated accurate prediction model
Examples of the electropherograms for the selected markers, ordered to their chromosomal position.
<p>On the Y-axis, the peak intensity is given. On the X-axis, the fragment size is given in basepairs. On the left side, results from normal tissue are shown. Note that these markers have few or no stutter peaks and a fairly constant ratio (close to 1) between the heights of the two alleles. On the right side, results from representative tumor samples with LOH are shown.</p
Results of the microsatellite analysis of pre-TUR urine samples.
<p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0043345#s3" target="_blank">Results</a> of the microsatellite analysis of pre-TUR urine samples.</p
Overview of the variation between allele ratios for different markers.
<p>On the Y-axis, the ratio between the two alleles is given. On the X-axis, the different microsatellite markers are listed. A. The boxplots show that some previously used markers have a large variation in their allele ratio based on an analysis of blood DNA samples from 50 individuals. B. Behavior of the 12 selected markers, indicating they have very little variation in their allele ratio when tested on normal blood and urine from healthy individuals. C. In primary tumor DNA the allele ratio is much more variable due to LOH/AI.</p
Microsatellite markers selected for this study.
<p>Het: the expected heterozygosity (%) according to the CEPH database (<a href="http://www.cephb.fr/en/cephdb/browser.php" target="_blank">http://www.cephb.fr/en/cephdb/browser.php</a>). F/R: forward or reverse primer.</p
Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter Mutations in Bladder Cancer: High Frequency Across Stages, Detection in Urine, and Lack of Association with Outcome
Background: Hotspot mutations in the promoter of the gene coding for
telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) have been described and proposed
to activate gene expression.
Objectives: To investigate TERT mutation frequency, spectrum,
association with expression and clinical outcome, and potential for
detection of recurrences in urine in patients with urothelial bladder
cancer (UBC).
Design, setting, and participants: A set of 111 UBCs of different stages
was used to assess TERT promoter mutations by Sanger sequencing and TERT
messenger RNA (mRNA) expression by reverse transcription-quantitative
polymerase chain reaction. The two most frequent mutations were
investigated, using a SNaPshot assay, in an independent set of 184
non-muscle-invasive and 173 muscle-invasive UBC (median follow-up: 53 mo
and 21 mo, respectively). Voided urine from patients with suspicion of
incident UBC (n = 174), or under surveillance after diagnosis of
non-muscle-invasive UBC (n = 194), was tested using a SNaPshot assay.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Association of mutation
status with age, sex, tobacco, stage, grade, fibroblast growth factor
receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation, progression-free survival, disease-specific
survival, and overall survival.
Results and limitations: In the two series, 78 of 111 (70%) and 283 of
357 (79%) tumors harbored TERT mutations, C228T being the most frequent
substitution (83% for both series). TERT mutations were not associated
with clinical or pathologic parameters, but were more frequent among
FGFR3 mutant tumors (p = 0.0002). There was no association between TERT
mutations and mRNA expression (p = 0.3). Mutations were not associated
with clinical outcome. In urine, TERT mutations had 90% specificity in
subjects with hematuria but no bladder tumor, and 73% in
recurrence-free UBC patients. The sensitivity was 62% in incident and
42% in recurrent UBC. A limitation of the study is its retrospective
nature.
Conclusions: Somatic TERT promoter mutations are an early, highly
prevalent genetic event in UBC and are not associated with TERT mRNA
levels or disease outcomes. A SNaPshot assay in urine may help to detect
UBC recurrences. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by
Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved
Molecular markers increase precision of the European Association of Urology non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer progression risk groups
Abstract
Purpose: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recommend risk stratification based on clinicopathologic parameters. Our aim was to investigate the added value of biomarkers to improve risk stratification of NMIBC.
Experimental Design: We prospectively included 1,239 patients in follow-up for NMIBC in six European countries. Fresh-frozen tumor samples were analyzed for GATA2, TBX2, TBX3, and ZIC4 methylation and FGFR3, TERT, PIK3CA, and RAS mutation status. Cox regression analyses identified markers that were significantly associated with progression to muscle-invasive disease. The progression incidence rate (PIR = rate of progression per 100 patient-years) was calculated for subgroups.
Results: In our cohort, 276 patients had a low, 273 an intermediate, and 555 a high risk of tumor progression based on the EAU NMIBC guideline. Fifty-seven patients (4.6%) progressed to muscle-invasive disease. The limited number of progressors in this large cohort compared with older studies is likely due to improved treatment in the past two decades. Overall, wild-type FGFR3 and methylation of GATA2 and TBX3 were significantly associated with progression (HR = 0.34, 2.53, and 2.64, respectively). The PIR for EAU high-risk patients was 4.25. On the basis of FGFR3 mutation status and methylation of GATA2, this cohort could be reclassified into a good class (PIR = 0.86, 26.2% of patients), a moderate class (PIR = 4.32, 49.7%), and a poor class (PIR = 7.66, 24.0%).
Conclusions: We conclude that the addition of selected biomarkers to the EAU risk stratification increases its accuracy and identifies a subset of NMIBC patients with a very high risk of progression. Clin Cancer Res; 24(7); 1586–93. ©2018 AACR.</jats:p