Parents’ Perspectives on Variants of Uncertain Significance from Chromosome Microarray Analysis

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for unexplained anomalies and developmental delay has improved diagnosis rates, but results classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) may challenge both clinicians and families. We explored the impact of such results on families, including parental knowledge, understanding and interpretation. Semi‐structured telephone interviews were conducted with parents (N = 14) who received genetic counseling for a VUS in their child. Transcripts were analyzed through an iterative coding process. Participants demonstrated a range of recall and personal interpretation regarding whether test results provided a causal explanation for their children’s health issues. Participants maintained contradictory interpretations, describing results as answers while maintaining that little clarification of their child’s condition had been provided. Reported benefits included obtaining medical services and personal validation. Parents described adaptation/coping processes similar to those occurring after positive test results. Recall of terminology, including “VUS” and precise CMA abnormalities, was poor. However, most demonstrated conceptual understanding of scientific uncertainty. All participants expressed intentions to return for recommended genetics follow‐up but had misconceptions about how this would occur. These results provide insight into the patient‐and‐family experience when receiving uncertain genomic findings, emphasize the importance of exploring uncertainty during the communication process, and highlight areas for potential attention or improvement in the clinical encounter.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/146918/1/jgc40101.pd

Clinical Utilization Pattern of Liquid Biopsies (LB) to Detect Actionable Driver Mutations, Guide Treatment Decisions and Monitor Disease Burden During Treatment of 33 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients (pts) at a Fox Chase Cancer Center GI Oncology Subspecialty Clinic

Background: Liquid biopsy (LB) captures dynamic genomic alterations (alts) across metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) therapy and may complement tissue biopsy (TB). We sought to describe the utility of LB and better understand mCRC biology during therapy.Methods: Thirty-three patients (pts) with mCRC underwent LB. We used permutation-based t-tests to assess associations between alts, and clinical variables and used Kendall's tau to measure correlations.Results: Of 33 pts, 15 were women; 22 had colon, and the rest rectal cancer. Pts received a median of two lines of therapy before LB. Nineteen pts had limited testing on TB (RAS/RAF/TP53/APC), 11 extended NGS, and 3 no TB. Maxpct and alts correlated with CEA (p < 0.001, respectively). In 3/5 pts with serial LB, CEA correlated with maxpct trend, and CT tumor burden. In 6 pts, mutant RAS was seen in LB and not TB; 5/6 had received anti-EGFR therapy prior to LB, suggesting RAS alts developed post-therapy. In two pts RAS-mutated by TB, no RAS alts were detected on LB; these pts had low disease burden on CT at time of LB that also did not reveal APC or TP53 alts. In six patients who were KRAS wt based on TB, post anti-EGFR LB revealed subclonal KRAS mutations, likely a treatment effect. The median number of alts was higher post anti-EGFR LB (n = 12) vs. anti-EGFR naïve LB (n = 22) (9.5 vs. 5.5, p = 0.059) but not statistically significant. More alts were also noted in post anti-EGFR therapy LB vs. KRAS wt anti-EGFR-naïve LB (n = 6) (9.5 vs. 5) among patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.182).Conclusions: LB across mCRC therapy detects driver mutations, monitors disease burden, and identifies sub-clonal alts that reflect drug resistance, tumor evolution, and heterogeneity. Interpretation of LB results is impacted by clinical context

STUDI ALTERNATIF PERENCANAAAN SISTEM RANGKA PEMIKUL MOMEN KHUSUS (SRPMK) DENGAN KOLOM BULAT PADA KANTOR PUSAT ESTIKES KEPANJEN MALANG

Kolom merupakam elemen vertikal suatu struktur yang berfungsi menahan beban aksial dan momen sebagai akibat beban gravitasi dan beban lateral yang bekerja pada struktur. Oleh karena itu, kolom memegan penampang penting pada keutuhan struktur, apabila kolom mengalami kegagalan akan berakibat pada keruntuhan struktur bangunan atas gedung. perbedaan kolom bulat dan kolom persegi sangkat mendasar. Jika ditinjau dari tulangan sengkang, kolom bulat perpenampang spiral memiliki jarak sengkang yang berdekatan diabnding dengan kolom dengan kolom persegi yang mempunya bentuk sengkang tunggal dan jarak antara yang relatif besaar. Kolom bulat yang menghasilkan kapsitas penampang, gaya – gaya dalam seperti gaya aksial; gaya geser; gaya momen, dan simpangan (maximum displacement) sehingga dalam skripsi ini untuk mengetahui desain kolom bulat yang efisien dan efikas didalam perencanaan. Hasil yang diperoleh dari perenanaan struktur gedung dengan kolom bulat pada gedung kantor pusat stikes kepanjen malang dengan program bantu STAAD PRO V 8, yang ditinjau dari kapasitas penampang dengan luas mutu beton kolom bulat menghasilkan ØPn (aksial nominal) = 3988,690 kN, ØMn ( Momen nominal ) = 478,812 kNm, Vn (Geser nominal) = 681629,848 N. Sehingga kolom bulat memiliki kapasitas penampang yang lebih besar dan efektif. Ditinjau dari rasio dan gaya-gaya dalam struktur, kolom bulat memiliki gaya aksial = 0,021, kekakuan struktur pada kolom bulat memiliki simpangan (maximum displacements) yang lebih besar dari kolom persegi. Sehingga kekakuan pada kolom bulat lebih tinggi dengan kolom persegi

Analysis of cell-free circulating tumor DNA in 419 patients with glioblastoma and other primary brain tumors.

Aim: Genomically matched trials in primary brain tumors (PBTs) require recent tumor sequencing. We evaluated whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could facilitate genomic interrogation in these patients. Methods: Data from 419 PBT patients tested clinically with a ctDNA NGS panel at a CLIA-certified laboratory were analyzed. Results: A total of 211 patients (50%) had ≥1 somatic alteration detected. Detection was highest in meningioma (59%) and gliobastoma (55%). Single nucleotide variants were detected in 61 genes, with amplifications detected in ERBB2, MET, EGFR and others. Conclusion: Contrary to previous studies with very low yields, we found half of PBT patients had detectable ctDNA with genomically targetable off-label or clinical trial options for almost 50%. For those PBT patients with detectable ctDNA, plasma cfDNA genomic analysis is a clinically viable option for identifying genomically driven therapy options

The economic value of liquid biopsy for genomic profiling in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background: Liquid biopsy (LB) can detect actionable genomic alterations in plasma circulating tumor circulating tumor DNA beyond tissue testing (TT) alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of adding LB to TT in the Canadian healthcare system. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a decision analytic Markov model from the Canadian public payer (Ontario) perspective and a 2-year time horizon in patients with treatment-naïve stage IV non-squamous NSCLC and ⩽10 pack-year smoking history. LB was performed using the comprehensive genomic profiling Guardant360™ assay. Standard of care TT for each participating institution was performed. Costs and outcomes of molecular testing by LB + TT were compared to TT alone. Transition probabilities were calculated from the VALUE trial (NCT03576937). Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess uncertainty in the model. Results: Use of LB + TT identified actionable alterations in more patients, 68.5 versus 52.7% with TT alone. Use of the LB + TT strategy resulted in an incremental cost savings of $3065 CAD per patient (95% CI, 2195–3945) and a gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.02) versus TT alone. More patients received chemo-immunotherapy based on TT with higher overall costs, whereas more patients received targeted therapy based on LB + TT with net cost savings. Major drivers of cost-effectiveness were drug acquisition costs and prevalence of actionable alterations. Conclusion: The addition of LB to TT as initial molecular testing of clinically selected patients with advanced NSCLC did not increase system costs and led to more patients receiving appropriate targeted therapy

Efficacy and Tolerability of ALK/MET Combinations in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancer With Acquired MET Amplification: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction: MET amplification is a potentially actionable resistance mechanism in ALK-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancer. Studies describing treatment outcomes of this molecular subgroup are lacking. Methods: We assembled a cohort of patients with ALK+ lung cancer and acquired MET amplification (identified by tissue or plasma) who received regimens targeting both ALK and MET. Efficacy and safety were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, respectively. Results: A total of 12 patients were included in the series. MET amplification was detected after a median of 1.5 (range 1–5) lines of therapy. Four distinct regimens were implemented to address MET amplification: crizotinib (n = 2), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = 6), alectinib plus capmatinib (n = 3), and alectinib plus crizotinib (n = 1). Partial responses were observed in five (42%) of 12 patients, including patients who received crizotinib (n = one of two), lorlatinib plus crizotinib (n = three of six), and alectinib plus capmatinib (n = one of three). Primary progression was observed in four patients (33%). Grades 1 to 2 peripheral edema, occurring in seven (58%) patients, was found with both crizotinib and capmatinib. One patient required dose reduction of capmatinib plus alectinib for persistent grade 2 edema. Across the regimens, one patient discontinued therapy for toxicity, specifically neurocognitive toxicity from lorlatinib plus crizotinib. At progression on ALK+ MET therapy, potential resistance mechanisms included MET copy number changes and ALK kinase domain mutations. Conclusions: Combined ALK and MET inhibition is associated with moderate antitumor activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC with concurrent MET amplification. Prospective studies are indicated to confirm activity and identify individuals most likely to benefit from the treatment

DataSheet_1_Genomic landscape of advanced prostate cancer patients with BRCA1 versus BRCA2 mutations as detected by comprehensive genomic profiling of cell-free DNA.docx

BRCA1-mutated prostate cancer has been shown to be less responsive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as compared to BRCA2-mutated prostate cancer. The reason for this differential response is not clear. We hypothesized this differential sensitivity to PARP inhibitors may be explained by distinct genomic landscapes of BRCA1 versus BRCA2 co-segregating genes. In a large dataset of 7,707 men with advanced prostate cancer undergoing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), 614 men harbored BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 alterations. Differences in the genomic landscape of co-segregating genes was investigated by Fisher’s exact test and probabilistic graphical models (PGMs). Results demonstrated that BRCA1 was significantly associated with six other genes, while BRCA2 was not significantly associated with any gene. These findings suggest BRCA2 may be the main driver mutation, while BRCA1 mutations tend to co-segregate with mutations in other molecular pathways contributing to prostate cancer progression. These hypothesis-generating data may explain the differential response to PARP inhibition and guide towards the development of combinatorial drug regimens in those with BRCA1 mutation.</p