96 research outputs found
Helping small babies survive: an evaluation of facility-based Kangaroo Mother Care implementation progress in Uganda
Introduction: Prematurity is the leading cause of newborn death in Uganda, accounting for 38% of the nation's 39,000 annual newborn deaths. Kangaroo mother care is a high-impact; cost-effective intervention that has been prioritized in policy in Uganda but implementation has been limited. Methods: A standardised, cross-sectional, mixed-method evaluation design was used, employing semi-structured key-informant interviews and observations in 11 health care facilities implementing kangaroo mother care in Uganda. Results: The facilities visited scored between 8.28 and 21.72 out of the possible 30 points with a median score of 14.71. Two of the 3 highest scoring hospitals were private, not-for-profit hospitals whereas the second highest scoring hospital was a central teaching hospital. Facilities with KMC services are not equally distributed throughout the country. Only 4 regions (Central 1, Central 2, East-Central and Southwest) plus the City of Kampala were identified as having facilities providing KMC services. Conclusion: KMC services are not instituted with consistent levels of quality and are often dependent on private partner support. With increasing attention globally and in country, Uganda is in a unique position to accelerate access to and quality of health services for small babies across the country.Key words: Delivery of health care, implementation, infant premature, Kangaroo Mother Care, neonatal, newborn, preterm, program evaluation, Ugand
Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda.
BACKGROUND: Over 40% of all deaths among children under 5 are neonatal deaths (0-28 days), and this proportion is increasing. In 2012, 2.9 million newborns died, with 99% occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Many of the countries with the highest neonatal mortality rates globally are currently or have recently been affected by complex humanitarian emergencies. Despite the global burden of neonatal morbidity and mortality and risks inherent in complex emergency situations, research investments are not commensurate to burden and little is known about the epidemiology or best practices for neonatal survival in these settings. METHODS: We used the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology to prioritize research questions on neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. Experts evaluated 35 questions using four criteria (answerability, feasibility, relevance, equity) with three subcomponents per criterion. Using SAS 9.2, a research prioritization score (RPS) and average expert agreement score (AEA) were calculated for each question. RESULTS: Twenty-eight experts evaluated all 35 questions. RPS ranged from 0.846 to 0.679 and the AEA ranged from 0.667 to 0.411. The top ten research priorities covered a range of issues but generally fell into two categories- epidemiologic and programmatic components of neonatal health. The highest ranked question in this survey was "What strategies are effective in increasing demand for, and use of skilled attendance?" CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a diverse group of experts used the CHRNI methodology to systematically identify and determine research priorities for neonatal health and survival in complex humanitarian emergencies. The priorities included the need to better understand the magnitude of the disease burden and interventions to improve neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. The findings from this study will provide guidance to researchers and program implementers in neonatal and complex humanitarian fields to engage on the research priorities needed to save lives most at risk
Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect
BACKGROUND: Annually over 520,000 newborns die from neonatal sepsis, and 60,000 more from tetanus. Estimates of the effect of clean birth and postnatal care practices are required for evidence-based program planning. OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for clean birth and postnatal care practices and estimate the effect on neonatal mortality from sepsis and tetanus for the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of multiple databases. Data were abstracted into standard tables and assessed by GRADE criteria. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were undertaken. For interventions with low quality evidence but a strong GRADE recommendation, a Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: Low quality evidence supports a reduction in all-cause neonatal mortality (19% (95% c.i. 1-34%)), cord infection (30% (95% c.i. 20-39%)) and neonatal tetanus (49% (95% c.i. 35-62%)) with birth attendant handwashing. Very low quality evidence supports a reduction in neonatal tetanus mortality with a clean birth surface (93% (95% c.i. 77-100%)) and no relationship between a clean perineum and tetanus. Low quality evidence supports a reduction of neonatal tetanus with facility birth (68% (95% c.i. 47-88%). No relationship was found between birth place and cord infections or sepsis mortality. For postnatal clean practices, all-cause mortality is reduced with chlorhexidine cord applications in the first 24 hours of life (34% (95% c.i. 5-54%, moderate quality evidence) and antimicrobial cord applications (63% (95% c.i. 41-86%, low quality evidence). One study of postnatal maternal handwashing reported reductions in all-cause mortality (44% (95% c.i. 18-62%)) and cord infection ((24% (95% c.i. 5-40%)).Given the low quality of evidence, a Delphi expert opinion process was undertaken. Thirty experts reached consensus regarding reduction of neonatal sepsis deaths by clean birth practices at home (15% (IQR 10-20)) or in a facility (27% IQR 24-36)), and by clean postnatal care practices (40% (IQR 25-50)). The panel estimated that neonatal tetanus mortality was reduced by clean birth practices at home (30% (IQR(20-30)), or in a facility (38% (IQR 34-40)), and by clean postnatal care practices (40% (IQR 30-50)). CONCLUSION: According to expert opinion, clean birth and particularly postnatal care practices are effective in reducing neonatal mortality from sepsis and tetanus. Further research is required regarding optimal implementation strategies
Newborn survival: a multi-country analysis of a decade of change
Neonatal deaths account for 40% of global under-five mortality and are ever more important if we are to achieve the Millennium Development Goal 4 (MDG 4) on child survival. We applied a results framework to evaluate global and national changes for neonatal mortality rates (NMR), healthy behaviours, intervention coverage, health system change, and inputs including funding, while considering contextual changes. The average annual rate of reduction of NMR globally accelerated between 2000 and 2010 (2.1% per year) compared with the 1990s, but was slower than the reduction in mortality of children aged 1-59 months (2.9% per year) and maternal mortality (4.2% per year). Regional variation of NMR change ranged from 3.0% per year in developed countries to 1.5% per year in sub-Saharan Africa. Some countries have made remarkable progress despite major challenges. Our statistical analysis identifies inter-country predictors of NMR reduction including high baseline NMR, and changes in income or fertility. Changes in intervention or package coverage did not appear to be important predictors in any region, but coverage data are lacking for several neonatal-specific interventions. Mortality due to neonatal infection deaths, notably tetanus, decreased, and deaths from complications of preterm birth are increasingly important. Official development assistance for maternal, newborn and child health doubled from 2003 to 2008, yet by 2008 only 6% of this aid mentioned newborns, and a mere 0.1% (US$4.56m) exclusively targeted newborn care. The amount of newborn survival data and the evidence based increased, as did recognition in donor funding. Over this decade, NMR reduction seems more related to change in context, such as socio-economic factors, than to increasing intervention coverage. High impact cost-effective interventions hold great potential to save newborn lives especially in the highest burden countries. Accelerating progress requires data-driven investments and addressing context-specific implementation realitie
Triple return on investment : the cost and impact of 13 interventions that could prevent stillbirths and save the lives of mothers and babies in South Africa
BACKGROUND : The time of labor, birth and the first days of life are the most vulnerable period for mothers and
children. Despite significant global advocacy, there is insufficient understanding of the investment required to save
additional lives. In particular, stillbirths have been neglected. Over 20 000 stillbirths are recorded annually in South
Africa, many of which could be averted. This analysis examines available South Africa specific stillbirth data and
evaluates the impact and cost-effectiveness of 13 interventions acknowledged to prevent stillbirths and maternal
and newborn mortality.
METHODS : Multiple data sources were reviewed to evaluate changes in stillbirth rates since 2000. The intervention
analysis used the Lives Saved tool (LiST) and the Family Planning module (FamPlan) in Spectrum. LiST was used to
determine the number of stillbirths and maternal and neonatal deaths that could be averted by scaling up the
interventions to full coverage (99%) in 2030. The impact of family planning was assessed by increasing FamPlanâs
default 70% coverage of modern contraception to 75% and 80% coverage. Total and incremental costs were
determined in the LiST costing module. Cost-effectiveness measured incremental cost effectiveness ratios per
potential life years gained.
RESULTS: Significant variability exists in national stillbirth data. Using the international stillbirth definition, the SBR
was 17.6 per 1 000 births in 2013. Full coverage of the 13 interventions in 2030 could reduce the SBR by 30% to
12.4 per 1 000 births, leading to an MMR of 132 per 100 000 and an NMR of 7 per 1 000 live births. Increased family
planning coverage reduces the number of deaths significantly. The full intervention package, with 80% family
planning coverage in 2030, would require US7.8 per capita) annually, which is less than baseline
costs of US10.2 per capita). All interventions were highly cost-effective.
CONCLUSION : This is the first analysis in South Africa to assess the impact of scaling up interventions to avert stillbirths.
Improved coverage of 13 interventions that are already recommended could significantly impact the rates of stillbirth
and maternal and neonatal mortality. Family planning should also be prioritized to reduce mortality and overall costs.http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirtham201
Improving newborn care practices through home visits: lessons from Malawi, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Uganda.
Background: Nearly all newborn deaths occur in low- or middle-income countries. Many of these deaths could be prevented through promotion and provision of newborn care practices such as thermal care, early and exclusive breastfeeding, and hygienic cord care. Home visit programmes promoting these practices were piloted in Malawi, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Uganda.
Objective: This study assessed changes in selected newborn care practices over time in pilot programme areas in four countries and evaluated whether women who received home visits during pregnancy were more likely to report use of three key practices.
Design: Using data from cross-sectional surveys of women with live births at baseline and endline, the Pearson chi-squared test was used to assess changes over time. Generalised linear models were used to assess the relationship between the main independent variable â home visit from a community health worker (CHW) during pregnancy (0, 1â2, 3+) â and use of selected practices while controlling for antenatal care, place of delivery, and maternal age and education.
Results: There were statistically significant improvements in practices, except applying nothing to the cord in Malawi and early initiation of breastfeeding in Bangladesh. In Malawi, Nepal, and Bangladesh, women who were visited by a CHW three or more times during pregnancy were more likely to report use of selected practices. Women who delivered in a facility were also more likely to report use of selected practices in Malawi, Nepal, and Uganda; association with place of birth was not examined in Bangladesh because only women who delivered outside a facility were asked about these practices.
Conclusion: Home visits can play a role in improving practices in different settings. Multiple interactions are needed, so programmes need to investigate the most appropriate and efficient ways to reach families and promote newborn care practices. Meanwhile, programmes must take advantage of increasing facility delivery rates to ensure that all babies benefit from these practices
Tanzaniaâs Countdown to 2015: an analysis of two decades of progress and gaps for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, to inform priorities for post-2015
Background Tanzania is on track to meet Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 for child survival, but is making
insuffi cient progress for newborn survival and maternal health (MDG 5) and family planning. To understand this mixed
progress and to identify priorities for the post-2015 era, Tanzania was selected as a Countdown to 2015 case study.
Methods We analysed progress made in Tanzania between 1990 and 2014 in maternal, newborn, and child mortality,
and unmet need for family planning, in which we used a health systems evaluation framework to assess coverage and
equity of interventions along the continuum of care, health systems, policies and investments, while also considering
contextual change (eg, economic and educational). We had fi ve objectives, which assessed each level of the health
systems evaluation framework. We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) and did multiple linear regression analyses to
explain the reduction in child mortality in Tanzania. We analysed the reasons for the slower changes in maternal and
newborn survival and family planning, to inform priorities to end preventable maternal, newborn, and child deaths
by 2030.
Findings In the past two decades, Tanzaniaâs population has doubled in size, necessitating a doubling of health and
social services to maintain coverage. Total health-care fi nancing also doubled, with donor funding for child health and
HIV/AIDS more than tripling. Trends along the continuum of care varied, with preventive child health services
reaching high coverage (âĽ85%) and equity (socioeconomic status diff erence 13â14%), but lower coverage and wider
inequities for child curative services (71% coverage, socioeconomic status diff erence 36%), facility delivery (52%
coverage, socioeconomic status diff erence 56%), and family planning (46% coverage, socioeconomic status diff erence
22%). The LiST analysis suggested that around 39% of child mortality reduction was linked to increases in coverage
of interventions, especially of immunisation and insecticide-treated bednets. Economic growth was also associated
with reductions in child mortality. Child health programmes focused on selected high-impact interventions at lower
levels of the health system (eg, the community and dispensary levels). Despite its high priority, implementation of
maternal health care has been intermittent. Newborn survival has gained attention only since 2005, but high-impact
interventions are already being implemented. Family planning had consistent policies but only recent reinvestment
in implementation.
Interpretation Mixed progress in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Tanzania indicates a complex
interplay of political prioritisation, health fi nancing, and consistent implementation. Post-2015 priorities for Tanzania
should focus on the unmet need for family planning, especially in the Western and Lake regions; addressing gaps for
coverage and quality of care at birth, especially in rural areas; and continuation of progress for child health
Consensus-based approach to develop a measurement framework and identify a core set of indicators to track implementation and progress towards effective coverage of facility-based Kangaroo Mother Care.
BACKGROUND: As efforts to scale up the delivery of Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) in facilities are increasing, a standardized approach to measure implementation and progress towards effective coverage is needed. Here, we describe a consensus-based approach to develop a measurement framework and identify a core set of indicators for monitoring facility-based KMC that would be feasible to measure within existing systems. METHODS: The KMC measurement framework and core list of indicators were developed through: 1) scoping exercise to identify potential indicators through literature review and requests from researchers and program implementers; and 2) face-to-face consultations with KMC and measurement experts working at country and global levels to review candidate indicators and finalize selection and definitions. RESULTS: The KMC measurement framework includes two main components: 1) service readiness, based on the WHO building blocks framework; and 2) service delivery action sequence covering identification, service initiation, continuation to discharge, and follow-up to graduation. Consensus was reached on 10 core indicators for KMC, which were organized according to the measurement framework. We identified 4 service readiness indicators, capturing national level policy for KMC, availability of KMC indicators in HMIS, costed operational plans for KMC and availability of KMC services at health facilities with inpatient maternity services. Six indicators were defined for service delivery, including weighing of babies at birth, identification of those â¤2000 g, initiation of facility-based KMC, monitoring the quality of KMC, status of babies at discharge from the facility and levels of follow-up (according to country-specific protocol). CONCLUSIONS: These core KMC indicators, identified with input from a wide range of global and country-level KMC and measurement experts, can aid efforts to strengthen monitoring systems and facilitate global tracking of KMC implementation. As data collection systems advance, we encourage program managers and evaluators to document their experiences using this framework to measure progress and allow indicator refinement, with the overall aim of working towards sustainable, country-led data systems
Helping small babies survive: an evaluation of facility-based Kangaroo Mother Care implementation progress in Uganda
Abstract Introduction: Prematurity is the leading cause of newborn death in Uganda, accounting for 38% of the nation's 39,000 annual newborn deaths
- âŚ