Identification of selected scientific problems for security sciences – slovak view (Визначення основних проблем питань безпеки в науці: досвід Словаччини)

Provided we want to protect a subject (or a certain interest) in an effective way, we have to study and research the subject, its surroundings and the relationships among them. With this, we can also contribute to the fulfilment of one of the functions of the state, which is undoubtedly also the provision of the security of the state as well as the security of citizens. Identification of scientific problems in all security sectors is very important for the further research work of security sciences. (За умови, що ми хочемо, щоб захистити об’єкт (або певний інтерес) в ефективний спосіб, ми повинні вивчати і досліджувати предмет, його оточення і відносини між ними. При цьому, ми можемо також зробити свій внесок у виконання однієї з функцій держави, що, безсумнівно, також надання безпеки держави, а також безпеки громадян. Ідентифікація наукових проблем у всіх секторах безпеки дуже важлива для подальших досліджень наук безпеки.

Questioning and organization studies

This essay identifies a cleavage in the organisation literature that separates ‘questions’ and ‘questioning’ at a very fundamental philosophical level. On the one hand, the objective notion of ‘questions’ has already been well addressed within organization studies, evident in how scholars have scrutinized questions as objects of analysis; for example, paying close attention to the forms and functions of questions as instruments of research. More recently, the linguistic turn within the social sciences has influenced how organization studies researchers have considered organizations as discursive entities, with debate extending to the discursive nature of ‘questions’. On the other hand, the process of ‘questioning’ remains under-researched. From one perspective, questioning the process of questioning is challenging, but, as we submit, this is precisely where American pragmatism can be helpful. As we explore in this essay, the forward-looking quality of pragmatist inquiry is what motors the process of questioning. Our pragmatist-inflected argument is that questioning does not have to always serve critique and position building in the organization studies field. Rather, questioning out of curiosity can build new dialogue and open up new methodological avenues. This may help change the habitual ways in which we explore ideas, problems and situations in organization studies as well as lead to more democratic forms of organizing. Crucially, in this essay we are not looking for ultimate ‘answers’; rather we hope to excite discussion about questioning by giving prominence to something that is so ubiquitous and taken-for-granted as to be invisible to many of us as an object of inquiry