30 research outputs found
Leksičke osobitosti odrješenja grijeha u Klimantovićevu zborniku iz 1512. godine
This paper presents the lexical and linguistic characteristics of absolution of sins in the Croatian Church Slavonic Klimantović’s Miscellany I, in which the patterns of release and absolution from sin are powerful oral mechanism adjusted to population of that time. In the analysis, the author used her own transliteration of the miscellany. Considered are the sacraments of reconciliation in chapters 32. Otrišenie op’ĉeno, 36. Ovo ẽod’rišenie od’rišiti od’ velikoga prok’lats’tvaand 37. Ovo estьod’rišenie od’rišiti nemoĉnika muž’ku i žen’sku gl vu. The study shows how much the language is considered archaic in those chapters as well as how much there are younger lexical influences, conditioned primarily by neighborly contacts that influenced vernacular. Archaic features of the vocabulary are recorded in domestic words from Protoslavic period as well as from dialectal Protoslavic layers, with a significant number of Moravisms (West Slavic lexemes) such as zakonь, suffix -kratь, adjective nebes’ki, verb otpustiti. Contribution to that are loanwords from Protoslavic period. Among other linguistic features, confirmations of archaic features are the older verb present tense forms -ši. The rejuvenation of lexis is obvious in the influence of vernacular on texts of absolution – in many Italianisms that entered into our system directly through Čakavian dialect such as eneralь, pun’ta, purgatorii, and in numerous Croatisms as a result of direct influence of vernacular which is not part of a joint Church Slavonic and Croatian lexis such as personal pronoun ĵa, the dative singular mani, interrogative pronoun čakoli, connective ako. Also, among other linguistic features are present for example younger suffixes -ega, -oga of the genitive singular of adjectives and pronouns. This paper presents the lexical and linguistic characteristics of absolution of sins in the Croatian Church Slavonic Klimantović’s Miscellany I, in which the patterns of release and absolution from sin are powerful oral mechanism adjusted to population of that time. In the analysis, the author used her own transliteration of the miscellany. Considered are the sacraments of reconciliation in chapters 32. Otrišenie op’ĉeno, 36. Ovo ẽod’rišenie od’rišiti od’ velikoga prok’lats’tvaand 37. Ovo estьod’rišenie od’rišiti nemoĉnika muž’ku i žen’sku gl vu. The study shows how much the language is considered archaic in those chapters as well as how much there are younger lexical influences, conditioned primarily by neighborly contacts that influenced vernacular. Archaic features of the vocabulary are recorded in domestic words from Protoslavic period as well as from dialectal Protoslavic layers, with a significant number of Moravisms (West Slavic lexemes) such as zakonь, suffix -kratь, adjective nebes’ki, verb otpustiti. Contribution to that are loanwords from Protoslavic period. Among other linguistic features, confirmations of archaic features are the older verb present tense forms -ši. The rejuvenation of lexis is obvious in the influence of vernacular on texts of absolution – in many Italianisms that entered into our system directly through Čakavian dialect such as eneralь, pun’ta, purgatorii, and in numerous Croatisms as a result of direct influence of vernacular which is not part of a joint Church Slavonic and Croatian lexis such as personal pronoun ĵa, the dative singular mani, interrogative pronoun čakoli, connective ako. Also, among other linguistic features are present for example younger suffixes -ega, -oga of the genitive singular of adjectives and pronouns.
Coastal Toponyms of the Island of Brač – Contribution to Bračka toponimija by Petar Šimunović
U radu se donose rezultati novih toponomastičkih istraživanja uzmorskoga pojasa
otoka Brača. Terenskim su istraživanjem obuhvaćena sva obalna bračka
naselja, a prikupljeno je 69 toponima koji nisu potvrđeni u Šimunovićevoj
Bračkoj toponimiji. Toponimijska se građa analizira motivacijski, tvorbeno i
prema jezičnome podrijetlu riječi kojima su motivirani. Upozorava se na potrebu
izrade toponomastičkih zemljovida te potrebu da se u turističkim zemljovidima
isprave pogrešni toponimski likovi.The paper analyses and describes the results of new toponomastics research
of the Brač Island. It is the result of field research carried out through interviews
with respondents. The collected toponyms were not recorded in Bračka toponimija.
The survey included all coastal settlements, and a total of 69 toponyms were
collected. The recorded toponyms are different in motivation. For example, there
are geographical names in toponymy (such as Garma, Humac, Vrilo), toponyms
pointing to the location of a geographic object (such as Druga punta, Postaro,
Punta ol Lava), those which refer to the composition and particularities of the
area (such as Crni rat, Malačnica), those defined by the position in relation to
another toponym (such as Bok Mlikega puntina, Punta ol Zvirja, Puntin ol Kupinove),
toponyms motivated by plant names (such as Borići, Konopjikova), and
toponyms of anthropomorphic origin (such as Jankovića rat, Bognja luka). It is
also noticed that even older residents are less familiar with the toponyms of their
settlement.
The need for the creation of toponomastic maps has been emphasized, so the
scientific research would be useful for preserving the knowledge of previous generations.
The paper also stresses the need to take active part in the creation of geographic
(tourist) maps which are widely available and which have inaccurate names
or names freely formed by the standard appellative that motivated the emergence
of toponyms