7 research outputs found

    Mild therapeutic hypothermia for patients with acute coronary syndrome and cardiac arrest treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (UNICORN). The design and rationale for the prospective, observational, multicenter study

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Cardiac arrest constitutes the most frequent reason for sudden death in developed countries. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors are at high risk of death or neurologic deficits. The existing data regarding effectiveness and safety of mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) for treatment of OHCA survivors are inconsistent and ambiguous. Moreover, a uniform protocol of treatment by means of MTH is lacking. Methods. The UNICORN study is a phase IV, prospective, international, multi-centre, observational study designed to assess the effectiveness of MTH in patients after OHCA with shockable rhythm presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The trial is expected to include up to 500 patients. Depending on the availability of MTH in each study centre, besides the routine treatment of ACS in OHCA survivors, patients will either undergo MTH according to a uniform protocol or will not undergo MTH (250 patients per group). The primary end-point of the study is all cause mortality at 180 days after enrolment. Secondary end-points include: neurological outcome at discharge, stent thrombosis at 30 days, bleeding according to the BARC criteria, infectious complications at 180 days, and rhythm and conduction disorders at 180 days. Ethics and dissemination. The study received approval from the Local Ethics Committee to conduct the study (Komisja Bioetyczna Uniwersytetu MikoƂaja Kopernika w Toruniu przy Collegium Medicum im. Ludwika Rydygiera w Bydgoszczy; study approval reference number KB 615/2015). The study results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02611934 (18 November 2015).

    Autorytety medyczne w Internecie. miejsce kardiologii w Internecie

    No full text

    Internet- w kardiologii, stymulacji serca i elektrofizjologii klinicznej

    No full text

    Internet- w kardiologii, stymulacji serca i elektrofizjologii klinicznej

    No full text

    Autorytety medyczne w Internecie. miejsce kardiologii w Internecie

    No full text

    EURObservational Research Programme: Regional differences and 1-year follow-up results of the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot)

    No full text
    AimsThe ESC-HF Pilot survey was aimed to describe clinical epidemiology and 1-year outcomes of outpatients and inpatients with heart failure (HF). The pilot phase was also specifically aimed at validating structure, performance, and quality of the data set for continuing the survey into a permanent Registry.MethodsThe ESC-HF Pilot study is a prospective, multicentre, observational survey conducted in 136 Cardiology Centres in 12 European countries selected to represent the different health systems across Europe. All outpatients with HF and patients admitted for acute HF on 1 day per week for eight consecutive months were included. From October 2009 to May 2010, 5118 patients were included: 1892 (37%) admitted for acute HF and 3226 (63%) patients with chronic HF. The all-cause mortality rate at 1 year was 17.4% in acute HF and 7.2% in chronic stable HF. One-year hospitalization rates were 43.9% and 31.9%, respectively, in hospitalized acute and chronic HF patients. Major regional differences in 1-year mortality were observed that could be explained by differences in characteristics and treatment of the patients.ConclusionThe ESC-HF Pilot survey confirmed that acute HF is still associated with a very poor medium-term prognosis, while the widespread adoption of evidence-based treatments in patients with chronic HF seems to have improved their outcome profile. Differences across countries may be due to different local medical practice as well to differences in healthcare systems. This pilot study also offered the opportunity to refine the organizational structure for a long-term extended European network

    Are hospitalized or ambulatory patients with heart failure treated in accordance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines? Evidence from 12 440 patients of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.

    No full text
    AIMS: To evaluate how recommendations of European guidelines regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for heart failure (HF) are adopted in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ESC-HF Long-Term Registry is a prospective, observational study conducted in 211 Cardiology Centres of 21 European and Mediterranean countries, members of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). From May 2011 to April 2013, a total of 12 440 patients were enrolled, 40.5% with acute HF and 59.5% with chronic HF. Intravenous treatments for acute HF were heterogeneously administered, irrespective of guideline recommendations. In chronic HF, with reduced EF, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs) were used in 92.2, 92.7, and 67.0% of patients, respectively. When reasons for non-adherence were considered, the real rate of undertreatment accounted for 3.2, 2.3, and 5.4% of the cases, respectively. About 30% of patients received the target dosage of these drugs, but a documented reason for not achieving the target dosage was reported in almost two-thirds of them. The more relevant reasons for non-implantation of a device, when clinically indicated, were related to doctor uncertainties on the indication, patient refusal, or logistical/cost issues. CONCLUSION: This pan-European registry shows that, while in patients with acute HF, a large heterogeneity of treatments exists, drug treatment of chronic HF can be considered largely adherent to recommendations of current guidelines, when the reasons for non-adherence are taken into account. Observations regarding the real possibility to adhere fully to current guidelines in daily clinical practice should be seriously considered when clinical practice guidelines have to be written
    corecore