59 research outputs found

    Advances in exosome therapies in ophthalmology–From bench to clinical trial

    Get PDF
    During the last decade, the fields of advanced and personalized therapeutics have been constantly evolving, utilizing novel techniques such as gene editing and RNA therapeutic approaches. However, the method of delivery and tissue specificity remain the main hurdles of these approaches. Exosomes are natural carriers of functional small RNAs and proteins, representing an area of increasing interest in the field of drug delivery. It has been demonstrated that the exosome cargo, especially miRNAs, is at least partially responsible for the therapeutic effects of exosomes. Exosomes deliver their luminal content to the recipient cells and can be used as vesicles for the therapeutic delivery of RNAs and proteins. Synthetic therapeutic drugs can also be encapsulated into exosomes as they have a hydrophilic core, which makes them suitable to carry water-soluble drugs. In addition, engineered exosomes can display a variety of surface molecules, such as peptides, to target specific cells in tissues. The exosome properties present an added advantage to the targeted delivery of therapeutics, leading to increased efficacy and minimizing the adverse side effects. Furthermore, exosomes are natural nanoparticles found in all cell types and as a result, they do not elicit an immune response when administered. Exosomes have also demonstrated decreased long-term accumulation in tissues and organs and thus carry a low risk of systemic toxicity. This review aims to discuss all the advances in exosome therapies in ophthalmology and to give insight into the challenges that would need to be overcome before exosome therapies can be translated into clinical practice

    Ice–Liquid Oscillations in Nanoconfined Water

    No full text
    Nanoscale confinement has a strong effect on the phase behavior of water. Studies in the last two decades have revealed a wealth of novel crystalline and quasicrystalline structures for water confined in nanoslits. Less is known, however, about the nature of ice–liquid coexistence in extremely nanoconfined systems. Here, we use molecular simulations to investigate the ice–liquid equilibrium for water confined between two nanoscopic disks. We find that the nature of ice–liquid phase coexistence in nanoconfined water is different from coexistence in both bulk water and extended nanoslits. In highly nanoconfined systems, liquid water and ice do not coexist in space because the two-phase states are unstable. The confined ice and liquid phases coexist in time, through oscillations between all-liquid and all-crystalline states. The avoidance of spatial coexistence of ice and liquid originates on the non-negligible cost of the interface between confined ice and liquid in a small system. It is the result of the small number of water molecules between the plates and has no analogue in bulk water

    Vapor deposition of water on graphitic surfaces: formation of amorphous ice, bilayer ice, ice I, and liquid water

    No full text
    Carbonaceous surfaces are a major source of atmospheric particles and could play an important role in the formation of ice. Here we investigate through molecular simulations the stability, metastability, and molecular pathways of deposition of amorphous ice, bilayer ice, and ice I from water vapor on graphitic and atomless Lennard-Jones surfaces as a function of temperature. We find that bilayer ice is the most stable ice polymorph for small cluster sizes, nevertheless it can grow metastable well above its region of thermodynamic stability. In agreement with experiments, the simulations predict that on increasing temperature the outcome of water deposition is amorphous ice, bilayer ice, ice I, and liquid water. The deposition nucleation of bilayer ice and ice I is preceded by the formation of small liquid clusters, which have two wetting states: bilayer pancake-like (wetting) at small cluster size and droplet-like (non-wetting) at larger cluster size. The wetting state of liquid clusters determines which ice polymorph is nucleated: bilayer ice nucleates from wetting bilayer liquid clusters and ice I from non-wetting liquid clusters. The maximum temperature for nucleation of bilayer ice on flat surfaces, T(B)(max) is given by the maximum temperature for which liquid water clusters reach the equilibrium melting line of bilayer ice as wetting bilayer clusters. Increasing water-surface attraction stabilizes the pancake-like wetting state of liquid clusters leading to larger T(B)(max) for the flat non-hydrogen bonding surfaces of this study. The findings of this study should be of relevance for the understanding of ice formation by deposition mode on carbonaceous atmospheric particles, including soot

    Ice–Liquid Oscillations in Nanoconfined Water

    No full text
    Nanoscale confinement has a strong effect on the phase behavior of water. Studies in the last two decades have revealed a wealth of novel crystalline and quasicrystalline structures for water confined in nanoslits. Less is known, however, about the nature of ice–liquid coexistence in extremely nanoconfined systems. Here, we use molecular simulations to investigate the ice–liquid equilibrium for water confined between two nanoscopic disks. We find that the nature of ice–liquid phase coexistence in nanoconfined water is different from coexistence in both bulk water and extended nanoslits. In highly nanoconfined systems, liquid water and ice do not coexist in space because the two-phase states are unstable. The confined ice and liquid phases coexist in time, through oscillations between all-liquid and all-crystalline states. The avoidance of spatial coexistence of ice and liquid originates on the non-negligible cost of the interface between confined ice and liquid in a small system. It is the result of the small number of water molecules between the plates and has no analogue in bulk water

    Evaluating the potential for epistasis.

    No full text
    <p>(A) The number of residues in each motif are determined for all representative thermophilic-mesophilic structure pairs and binned according to the motif size. (B) The number of residue substitutions, given as Hamming distance, in each equivalent thermophilic-mesophilic motif is determined and binned.</p

    Thermophilic enzyme clusters display closer atomic packing compared to mesophilic enzyme clusters for most enzyme pairs evaluated.

    No full text
    <p>(A) SASA<sub>1.4</sub> values for clusters from the representative thermophilic-mesophilic structure pairs are shown, with thermophilic clusters shown in red, mesophilic clusters in green and the difference, ΔSASA<sub>1.4</sub>, in blue. Values are sorted by ΔSASA<sub>1.4</sub>. (B) SASA<sub>1.4</sub> values are shown comparing clusters from the thermophilic (PDB 1a5z) and mesophilic (PDB 6ldh) lactate dehydrogenase enzymes, which have a difference in optimum activity temperature of 30°C. (C) the thermophilic (PDB 1a5z) and mesophilic (PDB 5ldh) lactate dehydrogenase enzymes, with a difference in optimum activity temperature of 48°C, (D) and the thermophilic (PDB 1a5z) and psychrophilic (PDB 1ldh) lactate dehydrogenase enzymes, with a difference in optimum activity temperature of 70°C.</p

    The backbone can move significantly in the structurally equivalent clusters.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Three Cα atoms from a paired cluster are shown in red spheres (thermophilic enzyme) and purple spheres (mesophilic enzyme). The atoms are labeled a, b and c for the thermophilic enzyme and a’, b’ and c’ for the mesophilic enzyme. The Euclidian distances between Cα atoms are shown for each enzyme, with the distance differences at right. (B) The sum of the absolute values for the distance differences (red), and the average distance differences (blue) for each representative cluster are shown, sorted by summed or averaged distances.</p
    corecore