Interventions to improve neurocognitive late-effects in pediatric and adolescent CNS tumor patients and survivors - a systematic review

INTRODUCTION Survival of children and adolescents diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) tumors massively improved over the last decades due to better diagnostics, treatment, and supportive care. However, morbidity is still the highest of all cancer entities in this age group with neurocognitive late-effects being one of the most severe. AIM With this systematic review, we aim to summarize interventions designed to prevent or improve neurocognitive late-effects in CNS tumor patients. METHOD We searched PubMed on August 16$^{th}$ 2022 and included publications studying interventions for neurocognitive late-effects in pediatric and adolescent patients and survivors diagnosed with a CNS tumor. We included any form of neurocognitive intervention during treatment or following treatment completion. We considered all types of studies except for expert opinions and case reports. RESULTS The literature search resulted in 735 publications. We included 43 publications in the full text screening and 14 met our inclusion criteria. Of those, two assessed the impact of pharmacological interventions, three of exercise interventions, five of online cognitive training, and four assessed behavioral interventions. Different neuropsychological test batteries and imaging were used to measure the impact of the respective interventions. Most studies showed a positive impact of the interventions in single to several of the subtests used. CONCLUSION We found several intervention studies indicating improvement of neurocognitive problems in children and adolescent CNS tumor survivors. In this population exercise interventions or online cognitive training might mitigate or improve neurocognitive late-effects

Cardiovascular disease after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) increase late morbidity and mortality in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). We compared the risk of CVD in ALL survivors to siblings, examined time trends, quantified treatment-related risks, and investigated whether risk extends beyond patients treated with anthracyclines and chest radiotherapy. METHODS The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study assessed CVD by patient questionnaire in 5-year ALL survivors diagnosed between 1976 and 2005 and their siblings. Participants were asked whether a physician had ever told them that they had hypertension, arrhythmia, heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, thrombosis or valvular problems. We investigated treatment-related risk factors for CVD using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, BMI, smoking, diabetes mellitus, alcohol consumption and physical activity. RESULTS We contacted 707 survivors and 1299 siblings, 511 (72%) and 709 (55%) of whom responded, respectively. Survivors had a higher risk of developing CVD than siblings (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.3–2.8), in particular heart failure (OR 13.9, 1.8–107.4). Compared to patients treated 1976–85, the risk of CVD was 1.4 (0.7–2.8) for those treated 1985–1994 and 1.5 (0.6–3.7) for those treated 1995–2005. The overall CVD risks after anthracycline treatment (OR 3.1, 2.0–4.7), haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.0, 2.4–26.9) or relapse (OR 4.1, 1.9–8.8) were increased compared to those of siblings, while the CVD risks of survivors treated without anthracycline or chest radiotherapy were similar (OR 1.0; 0.5–2.0). CONCLUSIONS Despite attempts to reduce cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer treatment, CVD risks in ALL survivors treated more recently do not seem to have declined

Long-term pulmonary disease among Swiss childhood cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND Pulmonary diseases are potentially severe late complications of childhood cancer treatment that increase mortality risk among survivors. This nationwide study assesses the prevalence and incidence of pulmonary diseases in long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and their siblings, and quantifies treatment-related risks. METHODS As part of the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we studied CCS who were diagnosed between 1976 and 2005 and alive at least 5 years after diagnosis. We compared prevalence of self-reported pulmonary diseases (pneumonia, chest wall abnormalities, lung fibrosis, emphysema) between CCS and their siblings, calculated cumulative incidence of pulmonary diseases using the Kaplan-Meier method, and determined risk factors using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS CCS reported more pneumonias (10% vs. 7%, P = 0.020) and chest wall abnormalities (2% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.003) than siblings. Treatment with busulfan was associated with prevalence of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-14.9), and thoracic surgery was associated with chest wall abnormalities and lung fibrosis (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.6-10.7 and OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.7-26.6). Cumulative incidence of any pulmonary disease after 35 years of follow-up was 21%. For pneumonia, the highest cumulative incidence was seen in CCS treated with both pulmotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the thorax (23%). CONCLUSION This nationwide study in CCS found an increased risk for pulmonary diseases, especially pneumonia, while still young, which indicates that CCS need long-term pulmonary follow-up

Es geht um Lebensqualität

Das Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin der Universität ist eines der international führenden Institute in der Erforschung von Ursachen und Folgen von Lungenerkrankungen. Wir haben zwei Forscherinnen zu einem von der Lungenliga Bern unterstützten Gesuch befragt

Validation of questionnaire-reported chest wall abnormalities with a telephone interview in Swiss childhood cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND Chest wall abnormalities are a poorly studied complication after treatment for childhood cancer. Chest wall abnormalities are not well-described in the literature, and little is known on the impact on daily life of survivors. METHODS We investigated prevalence and risk factors of chest wall abnormalities in childhood cancer survivors in a nationwide, population-based cohort study (Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study) with a questionnaire survey. We then interviewed a nested sample of survivors to validate types of chest wall abnormalities and understand their impact on the daily life of survivors. RESULTS Forty-eight of 2382 (95%CI 2-3%) survivors reported a chest wall abnormality. Risk factors were older age at cancer diagnosis (16-20 years; OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.0-6.1), lymphoma (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.2-11.4), and central nervous system tumors (OR 9.5, 95%CI 3.0-30.1) as underlying disease, and treatment with thoracic radiotherapy (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.0-4.2), surgery to the chest (OR 4.5, 95%CI 1.8-11.5), or chemotherapy (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.0-8.1). The nature of the chest wall abnormalities varied and included thoracic wall deformities (30%), deformations of the spine (5%) or both (55%), and scars (10%). Chest wall abnormalities affected daily life in two thirds (13/20) of those who reported these problems and necessitated medical attention for 15 (75%) survivors. CONCLUSION It is important that, during follow-up care, physicians pay attention to chest wall abnormalities, which are rare late effects of cancer treatment, but can considerably affect the well-being of cancer survivors

Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.

BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis is the most common form of joint disease and the leading cause of pain and physical disability in older people. Opioids may be a viable treatment option if people have severe pain or if other analgesics are contraindicated. However, the evidence about their effectiveness and safety is contradictory. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects on pain, function, safety, and addiction of oral or transdermal opioids compared with placebo or no intervention in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (up to 28 July 2008, with an update performed on 15 August 2012), checked conference proceedings, reference lists, and contacted authors. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared oral or transdermal opioids with placebo or no treatment in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis. We excluded studies of tramadol. We applied no language restrictions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted data in duplicate. We calculated standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for pain and function, and risk ratios for safety outcomes. We combined trials using an inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS We identified 12 additional trials and included 22 trials with 8275 participants in this update. Oral oxycodone was studied in 10 trials, transdermal buprenorphine and oral tapentadol in four, oral codeine in three, oral morphine and oral oxymorphone in two, and transdermal fentanyl and oral hydromorphone in one trial each. All trials were described as double-blind, but the risk of bias for other domains was unclear in several trials due to incomplete reporting. Opioids were more beneficial in pain reduction than control interventions (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.20), which corresponds to a difference in pain scores of 0.7 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) between opioids and placebo. This corresponds to a difference in improvement of 12% (95% CI 9% to 15%) between opioids (41% mean improvement from baseline) and placebo (29% mean improvement from baseline), which translates into a number needed to treat (NNTB) to cause one additional treatment response on pain of 10 (95% CI 8 to 14). Improvement of function was larger in opioid-treated participants compared with control groups (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.17), which corresponds to a difference in function scores of 0.6 units between opioids and placebo on a standardised Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) disability scale ranging from 0 to 10. This corresponds to a difference in improvement of 11% (95% CI 7% to 14%) between opioids (32% mean improvement from baseline) and placebo (21% mean improvement from baseline), which translates into an NNTB to cause one additional treatment response on function of 11 (95% CI 7 to 14). We did not find substantial differences in effects according to type of opioid, analgesic potency, route of administration, daily dose, methodological quality of trials, and type of funding. Trials with treatment durations of four weeks or less showed larger pain relief than trials with longer treatment duration (P value for interaction = 0.001) and there was evidence for funnel plot asymmetry (P value = 0.054 for pain and P value = 0.011 for function). Adverse events were more frequent in participants receiving opioids compared with control. The pooled risk ratio was 1.49 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.63) for any adverse event (9 trials; 22% of participants in opioid and 15% of participants in control treatment experienced side effects), 3.76 (95% CI 2.93 to 4.82) for drop-outs due to adverse events (19 trials; 6.4% of participants in opioid and 1.7% of participants in control treatment dropped out due to adverse events), and 3.35 (95% CI 0.83 to 13.56) for serious adverse events (2 trials; 1.3% of participants in opioid and 0.4% of participants in control treatment experienced serious adverse events). Withdrawal symptoms occurred more often in opioid compared with control treatment (odds ratio (OR) 2.76, 95% CI 2.02 to 3.77; 3 trials; 2.4% of participants in opioid and 0.9% of participants control treatment experienced withdrawal symptoms). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The small mean benefit of non-tramadol opioids are contrasted by significant increases in the risk of adverse events. For the pain outcome in particular, observed effects were of questionable clinical relevance since the 95% CI did not include the minimal clinically important difference of 0.37 SMDs, which corresponds to 0.9 cm on a 10-cm VAS

Pulmonary Dysfunction after Treatment for Childhood Cancer: Comparing Multiple-Breath Washout with Spirometry.

RATIONALE Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of long-term pulmonary dysfunction, but we lack sensitive outcome measures to detect early pulmonary damage. OBJECTIVE To assess the ability of nitrogen multiple-breath washout (N2MBW) for detecting pulmonary dysfunction compared to spirometry in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS We analyzed cross-sectional data from long-term (≥ 5-year) survivors of childhood cancer, aged ≤16 years at cancer diagnosis, ≥16 years at study (assessment period 2015-2019). We categorized survivors by risk: high risk for those having had pulmotoxic chemotherapy, chest radiation, thoracic surgery, and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and standard risk for other cancer therapies. Primary outcomes were the global lung clearance index (LCI) and acinar ventilation inhomogeneity index (SACIN) from N2MBW, and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and functional vital capacity (FVC) from spirometry. We calculated z scores for N2MBW and spirometry parameters and compared pulmonary dysfunction between risk groups. Pulmonary dysfunction was defined as z score +1.64 for N2MBW and -1.64 for spirometry. RESULTS We studied 46 survivors, median age at diagnosis 10 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4-14), median age at study 30 years (IQR 25-40). Thirty-seven percent were at high risk and 63% at standard risk for pulmonary dysfunction. LCI and SACIN were higher in the high risk group compared to the standard risk group (mean LCI z scores 2.09, standard deviation [SD] 2.39 vs 0.95, SD 2.81; mean SACIN z scores 2.45, SD 3.29 vs 0.65, SD 2.79). FEV1 and FVC were lower in the high risk compared to the standard risk group (mean FEV1 z scores -0.94, SD 1.39 vs -0.10, SD 1.07; mean FVC z scores -1.14, SD 1.23 vs 0.15, SD 1.61). Overall, LCI, SACIN, FEV1, and FVC were abnormal in 60%, 53%, 33%, and 33% of high risk patients compared to 23%, 21%, 0%, and 4% of standard risk patients. CONCLUSIONS N2MBW identified more cases of pulmonary dysfunction in long-term survivors of childhood cancer than spirometry, even in patients who had cancer therapy not specifically known as being pulmotoxic. N2MBW could be a complementary screening tool for early pulmonary damage after treatment for childhood cancer. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02730767)

Validation of questionnaire-reported chest wall abnormalities with a telephone interview in Swiss childhood cancer survivors

Background: Chest wall abnormalities are a poorly studied complication after treatment for childhood cancer. Chest wall abnormalities are not well-described in the literature, and little is known on the impact on daily life of survivors. Methods: We investigated prevalence and risk factors of chest wall abnormalities in childhood cancer survivors in a nationwide, population-based cohort study (Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study) with a questionnaire survey. We then interviewed a nested sample of survivors to validate types of chest wall abnormalities and understand their impact on the daily life of survivors. Results: Forty-eight of 2382 (95%CI 2-3%) survivors reported a chest wall abnormality. Risk factors were older age at cancer diagnosis (16-20 years; OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.0-6.1), lymphoma (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.2-11.4), and central nervous system tumors (OR 9.5, 95%CI 3.0-30.1) as underlying disease, and treatment with thoracic radiotherapy (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.0-4.2), surgery to the chest (OR 4.5, 95%CI 1.8-11.5), or chemotherapy (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.0-8.1). The nature of the chest wall abnormalities varied and included thoracic wall deformities (30%), deformations of the spine (5%) or both (55%), and scars (10%). Chest wall abnormalities affected daily life in two thirds (13/20) of those who reported these problems and necessitated medical attention for 15 (75%) survivors. Conclusion: It is important that, during follow-up care, physicians pay attention to chest wall abnormalities, which are rare late effects of cancer treatment, but can considerably affect the well-being of cancer survivors.</p

Longitudinal assessment of lung function in Swiss childhood cancer survivors-A multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE Childhood cancer survivors are at risk for pulmonary morbidity due to exposure to lung-toxic treatments, including specific chemotherapeutics, radiotherapy, and surgery. Longitudinal data on lung function and its change over time are scarce. We investigated lung function trajectories in survivors over time and the association with lung-toxic treatments. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included Swiss survivors diagnosed between 1990 and 2013 and exposed to lung-toxic chemotherapeutics or thoracic radiotherapy. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs), including forced expiration volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, total lung capacity,  and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, were obtained from hospital charts. We calculated z-scores and percentage predicted, described lung function over time, and determined risk factors for change in FEV1 and FVC using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS We included 790 PFTs from 183 survivors, with a median age of 12 years at diagnosis and 5.5 years of follow-up. Most common diagnosis was lymphoma (55%). Half (49%) of survivors had at least one abnormal pulmonary function parameter, mainly restrictive (22%). Trajectories of FEV1 and FVC started at z-scores of -1.5 at diagnosis and remained low throughout follow-up. Survivors treated with thoracic surgery started particularly low, with an FEV1 of -1.08 z-scores (-2.02 to -0.15) and an FVC of -1.42 z-scores (-2.27 to -0.57) compared to those without surgery. CONCLUSION Reduced pulmonary function was frequent but mainly of mild to moderate severity. Nevertheless, more research and long-term surveillance of this vulnerable population is needed

Long-term auditory complications after childhood cancer: A report from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

BACKGROUND: Auditory complications are an adverse event of childhood cancer treatment, especially common in children treated with platinum chemotherapy or cranial radiation. Variation between diagnostic childhood cancer groups has rarely been studied, and we do not know if the burden of auditory complications has changed over the last decades. PROCEDURE: Within the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we sent a questionnaire to all survivors who were diagnosed at age 16 years or less between 1976 and 2005. We compared prevalence of self-reported hearing loss and tinnitus between all diagnostic childhood cancer groups and siblings, used multivariable logistic regression to analyze the effect of treatment-related factors on hearing loss, and compared the cumulative incidence of hearing loss between different periods of cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Prevalence of self-reported hearing loss was higher in survivors (10%) than in siblings (3%, P 29 Gy: OR >1.7), or brain surgery (OR 2.2). Children diagnosed in 1986-1995, when platinum compounds came into widespread use, had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of hearing loss than those diagnosed in 1976-1985. In the most recent period, 1996-2005, the risk decreased again, both for patients treated with platinum compounds and with cranial radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the burden of hearing loss has stabilized in recently treated survivors, suggesting that survivors have benefited from new treatment regimens that use less ototoxic radiation and more carefully dosed platinum compounds