Imaging of blunt pancreatic trauma : the value of initial and sequential CT examinations

Background: The purpose of the study was to assess the value of initial, repeated and sequential computed tomography (CT) in patients with blunt pancreatic trauma, and then define and correlate CT findings with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), ultrasound (US), both laboratory and surgical findings. Material/Methods: This retrospective study covers an eight-year period from 1999 to 2007. The material includes 21 patients (17 males and 4 females) with confirmed pancreatic injury. CT was performed on admission in all cases and in 15 cases follow-up CT was performed from 24 hrs to 14 days later. US was performed in 9 cases, ERCP in 8 cases and MRCP in one case. Serum amylase level was obtained at the admission in all cases. Results: The CT at admission was positive in 17 patients (81.0%); the diagnosis was missed in 4 patients (19.0%), all performed on single row spiral CT. In all these four cases repeated CT was positive. ERCP showed rupture of the main pancreatic duct in 7 cases, one was inconclusive. One MRCP was positive. The serum amylase was elevated in 14 cases (66.7%) Specific CT features in initial and repeated examinations together were: organ fracture - 33.3%, swelling - 38.1%, haematoma/contusion - 38.1%, fluid between splenic vein and pancreas - 19.0%. Non-specific features were: thickening of anterior-renal fascia - 23.8%, fluid in lesser sac - 28.6%, extra peritoneal fluid - 42.9%, associated splenic injury - 14.3% and intraperitoneal fluid - 38.1%. On retrospective analysis, two out of four false negative CT results could have been avoided. No correlation between the CT features and the outcome of surgical and conservative management could be found in this study. Conclusions: A proper technique and accurate reading of images are mandatory for the diagnosis of pancreatic injury. When CT performed on admission is negative and there is abdominal pain and an elevated serum amylase, CT examination should be repeated within 24-48 hours

Review of Interventional Therapies for Refractory Pediatric Migraine.

This is a review of the latest and seminal evidence in pediatric migraine. It covers the etiology and pathophysiology known today, and then will review treatment options, efficacy and safety, quality of data and indications. Though migraine is usually regarded as an infliction in adults, it is not uncommon in the pediatric population and affects up to 8% of children. Children may experience migraine differently than adults, and present not only with headache but also frequent gastrointestinal symptoms. They are frequently shorter in duration than in adults. Traditional migraine treatment in adults is less effective in children. In this population, adjunct therapies - such as interventional techniques - should be considered when traditional treatment fails, including Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections, peripheral nerve and ganglion blocks. BTA injections are FDA approved for migraine prophylaxis in adults, but currently not in children; however, recent evidence shows efficacy and safety in pediatric migraine management. Nerve blocks stop nociceptive afferent fibers through injection of local anesthetics, and it may be associated with the local injection of corticosteroids. Although more common in adults, recent data suggests they are safe and effective in children and adolescents. Blocking the sphenopalatine ganglion can be achieved through nasal approach, and achieves a similar action by blocking the entire ganglion. Interventional techniques may provide a key component in the alleviation of this otherwise debilitating chronic migraine pain. Though most studies have been performed in adults, new studies provide encouraging results for treatment in children

Burnout among surgeons before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international survey

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had many significant impacts within the surgical realm, and surgeons have been obligated to reconsider almost every aspect of daily clinical practice. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study reported in compliance with the CHERRIES guidelines and conducted through an online platform from June 14th to July 15th, 2020. The primary outcome was the burden of burnout during the pandemic indicated by the validated Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure. Results: Nine hundred fifty-four surgeons completed the survey. The median length of practice was 10 years; 78.2% included were male with a median age of 37 years old, 39.5% were consultants, 68.9% were general surgeons, and 55.7% were affiliated with an academic institution. Overall, there was a significant increase in the mean burnout score during the pandemic; longer years of practice and older age were significantly associated with less burnout. There were significant reductions in the median number of outpatient visits, operated cases, on-call hours, emergency visits, and research work, so, 48.2% of respondents felt that the training resources were insufficient. The majority (81.3%) of respondents reported that their hospitals were included in the management of COVID-19, 66.5% felt their roles had been minimized; 41% were asked to assist in non-surgical medical practices, and 37.6% of respondents were included in COVID-19 management. Conclusions: There was a significant burnout among trainees. Almost all aspects of clinical and research activities were affected with a significant reduction in the volume of research, outpatient clinic visits, surgical procedures, on-call hours, and emergency cases hindering the training. Trial registration: The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04433286" on 16/06/2020

Mandibular Nerve Block for Long-Term Pain Relief in a Case of Refractory Burning Mouth Syndrome

Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Images in Practice: Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction Characterized by Fat Infiltration in a Patient with Chronic Lumbar Back Pain

Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Comprehensive Review and Update of Burning Eye Syndrome

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (“dry eye”) is a common (14%–30% of adults over age 48) though difficult to treat condition that causes both discomfort and disability with associated dryness, pain, and visual disturbances. Etiology is not clearly understood but is likely varied, with a subset of patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain referred to as “burning eye syndrome.” This review of existing literature summarizes the clinical presentation, natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities of burning eye syndrome. Chronicity of burning eye syndrome is likely secondary to increased nociception from the cornea, decrease in inhibitory signals, and nerve growth factor expression alterations. Treatment centers around symptomatic alleviation and reduction of inflammation. Conservative treatments focus on well-being and perception and include exercise, acupuncture, and cognitive behavioral therapy. Topical treatment consists of the anti-adhesion T-cell antagonist lifitegrast, corticosteroids, and cyclosporine; all have moderate efficacy and good safety. Autologous serum eye drops are a second-line topical that may promote corneal and neural healing on top of symptomatic relief. When these treatments fail, patients may trial neuromodulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Despite general treatment safety, more research is needed to develop novel approaches to this condition, possibly focusing more directly on the neurological component

Naldemedine for the Use of Management of Opioid Induced Constipation

Purpose of Review: Opioid medications are a pillar of acute and chronic analgesia, though their use is often accompanied by side-effects, such as opioid-induced constipation. Unfortunately, tolerance rarely develops to this untoward side effect. This review presents the background, evidence, and indications for the use of Naldemedine (Brand name Symproic 0.2 mg tablets) to treat opioid-induced constipation. Recent Findings: Opioids are often used for the treatment of acute and chronic analgesia. Outside of the central effect they exert, they also interact with peripheral receptors, resulting in opioid-induced constipation, the commonest of side effects of chronic opioid usage. Complications include colonic distention, ileus, perforation, and can progress to other serious bowel complications, which can result in hospitalization and fatal events.For the most part, laxatives and other anti-constipation therapies are often inefficient and require intervention directed at the root cause, such as peripheral mu receptor agonists, including methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, and naldemedine. Naldemedine is the most recent to gain FDA approval of the group.An antagonist of Mu, Kappa, and Delta peripheral receptors, Naldemedine, is the only drug to counteract all three receptor classes. It was shown to be both safe and effective when compared with placebo. No data exists to compare its efficacy to that of other members of the group. Summary: Opioids are frequently used in the management of acute and chronic pain. The most common of the side effects is opioid-induced constipation, secondary to the peripheral activity of opioids. Naldemedine is an FDA-approved, once-daily oral tablet that counteracts this side effect by antagonizing mu, kappa, and delta-opioid receptors and has been shown to be safe and effective. Further investigation including head-to-head clinical trials are required to evaluate the relative efficacy of naldemedine compare with other peripheral opiate receptor antagonists

Naldemedine for the Use of Management of Opioid Induced Constipation

Purpose of Review: Opioid medications are a pillar of acute and chronic analgesia, though their use is often accompanied by side-effects, such as opioid-induced constipation. Unfortunately, tolerance rarely develops to this untoward side effect. This review presents the background, evidence, and indications for the use of Naldemedine (Brand name Symproic 0.2 mg tablets) to treat opioid-induced constipation. Recent Findings: Opioids are often used for the treatment of acute and chronic analgesia. Outside of the central effect they exert, they also interact with peripheral receptors, resulting in opioid-induced constipation, the commonest of side effects of chronic opioid usage. Complications include colonic distention, ileus, perforation, and can progress to other serious bowel complications, which can result in hospitalization and fatal events.For the most part, laxatives and other anti-constipation therapies are often inefficient and require intervention directed at the root cause, such as peripheral mu receptor agonists, including methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, and naldemedine. Naldemedine is the most recent to gain FDA approval of the group.An antagonist of Mu, Kappa, and Delta peripheral receptors, Naldemedine, is the only drug to counteract all three receptor classes. It was shown to be both safe and effective when compared with placebo. No data exists to compare its efficacy to that of other members of the group. Summary: Opioids are frequently used in the management of acute and chronic pain. The most common of the side effects is opioid-induced constipation, secondary to the peripheral activity of opioids. Naldemedine is an FDA-approved, once-daily oral tablet that counteracts this side effect by antagonizing mu, kappa, and delta-opioid receptors and has been shown to be safe and effective. Further investigation including head-to-head clinical trials are required to evaluate the relative efficacy of naldemedine compare with other peripheral opiate receptor antagonists

Inotersen to Treat Polyneuropathy Associated with Hereditary Transthyretin (hATTR) Amyloidosis

# Background Amyloidosis is a group of diseases with the common pathophysiology of protein misfolding and aberrant deposition in tissue. There are both acquired and hereditary forms of this disease, and this review focuses on the latter hereditary transthyretin-mediated (hATTR). hATTR affects about 50,000 individuals globally and mostly appears as one of three syndromes - cardiac, polyneuropathy, and oculoleptomeningeal. Polyneuropathy is the most common form, and there is usually some overlap in individual patients. # Results Recently, novel therapeutic options emerged in the form of groundbreaking drugs, Patisiran and Inotersen, small interfering RNA molecules that target TTR and reduce the production of this protein. By targeting TTR mRNA transcripts, Inotersen decreases protein translation and production, reducing the deposition of misfolded proteins. It was shown to be both effective and safe for use and specifically formulated to concentrate in the liver -- where protein production takes place. # Conclusion hATTR is a rare, progressive, and debilitating disease. Its most common presentation is that of polyneuropathy, and it carries a very poor prognosis and a natural history conveying a median survival of \< 12 years. Novel therapeutic options are groundbreaking by providing disease-modifying specific, targeted therapies against TTR production and deposition. The use of RNA interference (RNAi) opens the door to the treatment of hereditary diseases by targeting them at the genetic level