23 research outputs found
Positive and negative agreement: Standard microbiology methods vs. xTAG (Benchmark).
<p>Positive and negative agreement: Standard microbiology methods vs. xTAG (Benchmark).</p
Positive agreement: xTAG vs. conventional testing (benchmark).
<p>Positive agreement: xTAG vs. conventional testing (benchmark).</p
Positive agreement: Conventional testing vs. xTAG (Benchmark).
<p>Positive agreement: Conventional testing vs. xTAG (Benchmark).</p
Positive and negative agreement: xTAG vs. standard microbiology methods (benchmark).
<p>Positive and negative agreement: xTAG vs. standard microbiology methods (benchmark).</p
Additional file 1: Table S1. of Evaluation of pre-symptomatic nitisinone treatment on long-term outcomes in Tyrosinemia type 1 patients: a systematic review
Search strategy for Ovid Medline. This table shows the electronic search strategy developed for Medline (Ovid) and the number of hits retrieved per line. Figure S1. EPHPP quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. This file shows the EPHPP âQuality assessment tool for quantitative studiesâ that was used to appraise the quality of all included studies. Table S2. Excluded studies with reason. This table lists all studies that were excluded at full text stage and reasons for their exclusion. (DOCX 126Â kb
Randomized controlled trials according to basis of hip implant comparison.
<p>XLPE = cross-linked polyethylene; PE = polyethylene; HA = hydroxyapatite; CoCr = cobalt chrome.</p
Implant dislocation of cemented cup vs. cementless cup.
<p>Implant dislocation of cemented cup vs. cementless cup.</p