Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from central nervous system specimens as reported by U.S. hospital laboratories from 2000 to 2002

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections of the central nervous system, especially acute infections such as bacterial meningitis require immediate, invariably empiric antibiotic therapy. The widespread emergence of resistance among bacterial species is a cause for concern. Current antibacterial susceptibility data among central nervous system (CNS) pathogens is important to define current prevalence of resistance. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens isolated from CNS specimens was analyzed using The Surveillance Database (TSN(®)) USA Database which gathers routine antibiotic susceptibility data from >300 US hospital laboratories. A total of 6029 organisms derived from CNS specimen sources during 2000–2002, were isolated and susceptibility tested. RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus (23.7%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.0%) were the most common gram-positive pathogens. Gram-negative species comprised approximately 25% of isolates. The modal patient age was 1 or <1 year for most organisms. Prevalence of MRSA among S. aureus from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain abscesses were 29.9–32.9%. Penicillin resistance rates were 16.6% for S. pneumoniae, 5.3% for viridans group streptococci, and 0% for S. agalactiae. For CSF isolates, ceftriaxone resistance was S. pneumoniae (3.5%), E. coli (0.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (2.8%), Serratia marcescens (5.6%), Enterobacter cloacae (25.0%), Haemophilus influenzae (0%). Listeria monocytogenes and N. meningitidis are not routinely susceptibility tested. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance is commonly detected, albeit still at relatively low levels for key drugs classes such as third-generation cephalosporins. This data demonstrates the need to consider predominant resistance phenotypes when choosing empiric therapies to treat CNS infections

Pharmacodynamic Activity of Ceftobiprole Compared with Vancomycin versus Methicillin-Resistant \u3cem\u3eStaphylococcus aureus\u3c/em\u3e (MRSA), Vancomycin-Intermediate \u3cem\u3eStaphylococcus aureus\u3c/em\u3e (VISA) and Vancomycin-Resistant \u3cem\u3eStaphylococcus aureus\u3c/em\u3e (VRSA) Using an In Vitro Model

Background This study compared the pharmacodynamics of ceftobiprole and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) using an in vitro model. Methods Two methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), two community-associated (CA)-MRSA, one healthcare-associated (HA)-MRSA, three VISA and two VRSA were studied. The pharmacodynamic model was inoculated with a concentration of 1 × 106 cfu/mL and ceftobiprole dosed every 8 h (at 0, 8 and 16 h) to simulate the fCmax and t1/2 obtained after 500 mg intravenous (iv) every 8 h dosing (fCmax, 30 mg/L; t1/2, 3.5 h). Vancomycin was dosed every 12 h (at 0 and 12 h) to simulate fCmax and t1/2 obtained after 1 g iv every 12 h dosing (fCmax, 20 mg/L; t1/2, 8 h). Samples were collected over 24 h to assess viable growth. Results Ceftobiprole T \u3e MIC of ≥100% (ceftobiprole MICs, ≤2 mg/L) was bactericidal (≥3 log10 killing) against MSSA, CA-MRSA, HA-MRSA, VISA and VRSA at 16 and 24 h. Vancomycin fAUC24/MIC of 340 (vancomycin MIC, 1 mg/L for MSSA and MRSA) resulted in a 1.8–2.6 log10 reduction in colony count at 24 h. Vancomycin fAUC24/MIC of 85–170 (vancomycin MIC, 2–4 mg/L for VISA) resulted in a 0.4–0.7 log10 reduction at 24 h. Vancomycin fAUC24/MIC of 5.3 (vancomycin MIC, 64 mg/L for VRSA) resulted in a limited effect. Conclusions Ceftobiprole T \u3e MIC of ≥100% (ceftobiprole MICs, ≤2 mg/L) was bactericidal (≥3 log10 killing) against MSSA, CA-MRSA, HA-MRSA, VISA and VRSA at 16 and 24 h. Vancomycin was bacteriostatic against MSSA, MRSA and VISA, while demonstrating no activity against VRSA

Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from blood cultures of hospitalized patients in the United States in 2002

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns should guide the choice of empiric antimicrobial regimens for patients with bacteremia. METHODS: From January to December of 2002, 82,569 bacterial blood culture isolates were reported to The Surveillance Network (TSN) Database-USA by 268 laboratories. Susceptibility to relevant antibiotic compounds was analyzed using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. RESULTS: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (42.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.5%), Enterococcus faecalis (8.3%), Escherichia coli (7.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (3.6%), and Enterococcus faecium (3.5%) were the most frequently isolated bacteria from blood cultures, collectively accounting for >80% of isolates. In vitro susceptibility to expanded-spectrum β-lactams such as ceftriaxone were high for oxacillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (98.7%), oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus (99.8%), E. coli (97.3%), K. pneumoniae (93.3%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (97.2%). Susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones were variable for K. pneumoniae (90.3–91.4%), E. coli (86.0–86.7%), oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus (84.0–89.4%), oxacillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (72.7–82.7%), E. faecalis (52.1%), and E. faecium (11.3%). Combinations of antimicrobials are often prescribed as empiric therapy for bacteremia. Susceptibilities of all blood culture isolates to one or both agents in combinations of ceftriaxone, ceftazdime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam or ciprofloxacin plus gentamicin were consistent (range, 74.8–76.3%) but lower than similar β-lactam or ciprofloxacin combinations with vancomycin (range, 93.5–96.6%). CONCLUSION: Ongoing surveillance for antimicrobial susceptibility remains essential, and will enhance efforts to identify resistance and attempt to limit its spread

Emerging resistance among bacterial pathogens in the intensive care unit – a European and North American Surveillance study (2000–2002)

Background Globally ICUs are encountering emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and for some pathogens there are few therapeutic options available. Methods Antibiotic in vitro susceptibility data of predominant ICU pathogens during 2000–2 were analyzed using data from The Surveillance Network (TSN) Databases in Europe (France, Germany and Italy), Canada, and the United States (US). Results Oxacillin resistance rates among Staphylococcus aureus isolates ranged from 19.7% to 59.4%. Penicillin resistance rates among Streptococcus pneumoniae varied from 2.0% in Germany to as high as 20.2% in the US; however, ceftriaxone resistance rates were comparably lower, ranging from 0% in Germany to 3.4% in Italy. Vancomycin resistance rates among Enterococcus faecalis were ≤ 4.5%; however, among Enterococcus faecium vancomycin resistance rates were more frequent ranging from 0.8% in France to 76.3% in the United States. Putative rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production among Enterobacteriaceae were low, \u3c6% among Escherichia coli in the five countries studied. Ceftriaxone resistance rates were generally lower than or similar to piperacillin-tazobactam for most of the Enterobacteriaceae species examined. Fluoroquinolone resistance rates were generally higher for E. coli (6.5% – 13.9%), Proteus mirabilis (0–34.7%), and Morganella morganii (1.6–20.7%) than other Enterobacteriaceae spp (1.5–21.3%). P. aeruginosa demonstrated marked variation in β-lactam resistance rates among countries. Imipenem was the most active compound tested against Acinetobacter spp., based on resistance rates. Conclusion There was a wide distribution in resistance patterns among the five countries. Compared with other countries, Italy showed the highest resistance rates to all the organisms with the exception of Enterococcus spp., which were highest in the US. This data highlights the differences in resistance encountered in intensive care units in Europe and North America and the need to determine current local resistance patterns by which to guide empiric antimicrobial therapy for intensive care infections

Tracking the implementation of NCCLS M100-S12 expanded-spectrum cephalosporin MIC breakpoints for nonmeningeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae by clinical laboratories in the United States during 2002 and 2003

BACKGROUND: The Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Twelfth Informational Supplement, M100-S12, published by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) in January 2002 introduced distinct minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretative breakpoints for ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cefepime for nonmeningeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Previously, a single set of interpretative breakpoints was used for both meningeal and nonmeningeal isolates. METHODS: To estimate the rate of adoption of the M100-S12 interpretive breakpoints by clinical laboratories, antimicrobial susceptibility test results for ceftriaxone and cefotaxime from nonmeningeal S. pneumoniae isolates were studied using data collected from January 2002 to June 2003 by The Surveillance Network(® )Database – USA (TSN(®)), an electronic surveillance database. RESULTS: Of the 262 laboratories that provided data that could be evaluated, 67.6% had adopted the M100-S12 breakpoints one and one-half years after they were published. CONCLUSIONS: The NCCLS M100-S12 recommendation to interpret MICs to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins using two distinct sets of breakpoints for meningeal and nonmeningeal isolates of S. pneumoniae was steadily implemented by clinical microbiology laboratories in the United States following their initial publication in January 2002. The use of these new breakpoints more accurately reflects the clinical activities of expanded-spectrum cephalosporins than did the single set of interpretative breakpoints previously used for both meningeal and nonmeningeal isolates

Assessment of the Activity of Ceftaroline Against Clinical Isolates of Penicillin-Intermediate and Penicillin-Resistant \u3cem\u3eStreptococcus pneumoniae\u3c/em\u3e with elevated MICs of Ceftaroline Using an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model

Objectives This study assessed the pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against penicillin-intermediate and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with elevated MICs of ceftaroline using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Methods Nine isolates of S. pneumoniae, including one penicillin-susceptible isolate, one penicillin-intermediate isolate and seven penicillin-resistant isolates, were tested. The pharmacodynamic model was inoculated with a concentration of 1 × 106 cfu/mL and ceftaroline was dosed twice daily (at 0 and 12 h) to simulate the fCmax (maximum free concentration in serum) and t1/2 (half-life in serum) obtained after 600 mg intravenous doses every 12 h (fCmax, 16 mg/L; t1/2, 2.6 h). Ceftaroline was compared with ceftriaxone dosed once daily to simulate the fCmax and t1/2 obtained after a 1 g dose (fCmax, 18 mg/L; t1/2, 8.0 h). Samples were collected over 24 h to assess viable growth and possible changes in ceftaroline MICs over time. Results Ceftaroline fT\u3eMIC (time of free serum concentration over the MIC) of 100% (ceftaroline MICs, ≤0.5 mg/L) was bactericidal (≥3 log10 killing) against all isolates at 6 h and completely eradicated all organisms at 12 and 24 h. No bacterial regrowth occurred over the study period and no changes in ceftaroline MICs were observed. Upon ceftriaxone exposure, S. pneumoniae isolates with ceftriaxone MICs of 0.12 and 0.25 mg/L were eradicated, but isolates with ceftriaxone MICs of 1–8 mg/L resulted in initial bacterial reduction at 6 h with organism regrowth at 12 h and no reduction in organism concentration, relative to the starting inoculum, at 24 h. Conclusions Ceftaroline fT\u3eMIC of 100% (ceftaroline MICs, ≤0.5 mg/L) was bactericidal (≥3 log10 killing) and eradicated all S. pneumoniae at 12 and 24 h with no regrowth

Real-life experience with ceftolozane/tazobactam in Canada: results from the CLEAR (Canadian LEadership on Antimicrobial Real-life usage) registry.

Objectives Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Gram-negative bacilli. We report the use of ceftolozane/tazobactam in Canada using a national registry. Methods The CLEAR registry uses REDCapTM (Research Electronic Data Capture) (online survey, https://is.gd/CLEAR_ceftolozanetazobactam) to capture details associated with clinical use of ceftolozane/tazobactam. Results Data from 51 patients treated in 2020 with ceftolozane/tazobactam are available. Infections treated included hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (37.3% of patients), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (15.7%), bone/joint infection (11.8%), complicated intra-abdominal infection (7.8%) and complicated skin and skin structure infection (7.8%). 17.6% of patients had bacteremia and 47.1% were in intensive care. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was primarily used as directed therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections (92.2% of patients). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was used because of resistance to (86.3%), failure of (11.7%), or adverse effects from (2.0%) previously prescribed antimicrobials. Ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptibility testing was performed on isolates from 88.2% of patients. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was used in combination with another antimicrobial active versus Gram-negative bacilli in 39.2% of patients (aminoglycosides [15.7%], fluoroquinolones [7.8%] and colistin/polymyxin B [7.8%]). The dosage regimen was customized in all patients based on their creatinine clearance. Treatment duration was primarily >10 days (60.8% of patients) with microbiological success in 60.5% and clinical success in 64.4% of patients. 7.8% of patients had adverse effects not requiring drug discontinuation. Conclusions In Canada, ceftolozane/tazobactam is used as directed therapy to treat a variety of severe infections caused MDR P. aeruginosa. It is commonly used in combination with other antimicrobials with relatively high microbiological/clinical cure rates, and an excellent safety profile

Analysis of multidrug resistance in the predominant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes in Canada:the SAVE study, 2011-15

Objectives: This study assessed MDR invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, in relation to serotype evolution in Canada between 2011 and 2015 as part of the annual SAVE study. Methods: As part of a collaboration between the Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance and Public Health Agency of Canada-National Microbiology Laboratory, 6207 invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae were evaluated. All isolates were serotyped and had antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed, in accordance with CLSI guidelines (M07-A10, 2015). Complete susceptibility profiles were available for 6001 isolates. MDR was defined as resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents (with penicillin MIC ≥2 mg/L defined as resistant). Results: The overall rate of MDR S. pneumoniae was 6.2% (372/6001) in SAVE, decreasing significantly from 8.5% in 2011 to 5.6% in 2015 (P = 0.0041). MDR was observed in 32 serotypes, with serotypes 15A and 19A predominating (26.6% and 41.7% of the MDR isolates, respectively). The overall proportion of serotypes 19A, 7F and 33A decreased significantly (P 5%) for 24F and 33F. Conclusions: In 2015, 56.3% of invasive MDR S. pneumoniae were serotypes included in the PCV-13 vaccine. PCV-13 includes the most commonly identified serotype, 19A; however, other increasingly important MDR serotypes, such as 15A, 24F and 33F, are notably not in the currently used vaccines

Analysis of 1560 inpatient and outpatient Escherichia coli isolates from across Canada - Results from the CANWARD 2007 study CANWARD 2007

OBJeCtIveS: Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen isolated in the Canadian Ward Surveillance Study (CANWARD 2007) and remains one of the most common pathogens isolated in all health care settings. An in-depth analysis of all E coli isolates was performed to determine the distribution and demographics associated with resistance to antimicrobials, presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and multidrug resistance (MDR; concurrent resistance to agents from three or more different antimicrobial classes). MethODS: The CANWARD 2007 study characterized pathogens isolated from inpatient (surgical and medical wards, and intensive care units) and outpatient (emergency departments and clinics) areas of 12 Canadian hospitals between January and December 2007. E coli susceptibility to 12 antimicrobials was determined, ESBL production was determined, and a multivariate nominal logistic regression model was designed to determine if sex, isolation from a sterile site, inpatient versus outpatient status, and age were significantly associated with susceptibility to the tested antimicrobials, MDR or ESBL production. ReSuLtS: In total, 1702 E coli isolates, representing 21.6% of all isolates collected in the CANWARD 2007 study, were investigated. Of these, 1560 isolates fell within the primary objective of the study and were included in the present analysis. Susceptibilities were greater than 90% for meropenem (100%), ertapenem (100%), tigecycline (99.9%), piperacillin-tazobactam (97.9%), cefepime (97.9%), ceftriaxone (95.4%), nitrofurantoin (95.2%), cefoxitin (94.8%), amoxicillinclavulanate (92.9%) and gentamicin (91.4%). Cefazolin (89.4%), the fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, 79.4%; levofloxacin, 79.9%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (75.7%) were less active agents. In the multivariate model, invasive isolates were significantly associated with lower susceptibility rates for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Increasing age was associated with lower susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, ceftriaxone, cefepime, gentamicin and nitrofurantoin, as well as ESBL production. Sex was not associated with resistance to any antimicrobial or to ESBL production. Inpatient status was associated with higher resistance rates to amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefazolin, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Isolation of an ESBL producer was only found to be independently associated with age, being more common in older patients. MDR was not found to be associated with any variable measured when ESBL producers were excluded from analysis. CONCLuSIONS: E coli antimicrobial susceptibility varies according to patient factors. Age and inpatient status were the most important determinants in the present analysis and should be considered when prescribing empirical antimicrobial therapy. Fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides should be used cautiously and in consideration of local resistance patterns for infections caused by E coli, due to lower susceptibility rates. Independent factors associated with antimicrobial resistance were age, inpatient status and isolation from a sterile site. These factors should be considered when empirically treating infections likely caused by E coli. Local antimicrobial prescribing practices, in particular the liberal use of fluoroquinolones, and inadequate infection control practices may be reducing susceptibility rates. OBJeCtIFS : L&apos;Escherichia coli était le pathogène le plus isolé dans l&apos;étude CANWARD 2007 sur la surveillance des services aux hospitalisés canadiens et demeure l&apos;un des pathogènes les plus isolés en milieu de santé. On a effectué une analyse approfondie de tous les isolats d&apos;E coli pour déterminer la répartition et la démographie associées à la résistance aux antimicrobiens ainsi qu&apos;à la présence de bêta-lactamases à large spectre (ESBL) et de multirésistance (résistance conjointe à au moins trois classes d&apos;antimicrobiens). MÉthODOLOGIe : L&apos;étude CANWARD 2007 caractérisait les pathogènes isolés de patients hospitalisés (service de chirurgie, service médical et unité de soins intensifs) et ambulatoires (urgence et cliniques) de 12 hôpitaux canadiens entre janvier et décembre 2007. On a déterminé la susceptibilité de l&apos;E coli à 12 antimicrobiens ainsi que la production d&apos;ESBL et conçu un modèle de régression logistique nominale multivariée pour déterminer si le sexe, l&apos;isolement d&apos;un foyer stérile, le statut de patient hospitalisé ou ambulatoire et l&apos;âge s&apos;associaient de manière significative à la susceptibilité aux antimicrobiens vérifiés, à la multirésistance ou à la production d&apos;ESBL. RÉSuLtAtS : Au total, on a évalué 1 072 isolats d&apos;E coli, représentant 21,6 % de tous les isolats prélevés dans le cadre de l&apos;étude CANWARD 2007. De ce nombre, 1 560 isolats respectaient l&apos;objectif primaire de l&apos;étude et ont été inclus dans la présente analyse. Les susceptibilités étaient supérieures à 90 % pour le méropénem (100 %), l&apos;ertapénem (100 %), la tigécycline (99,9 %), la pipéracilline-tazobactam (97,9 %), la céfépime (97.9 %), la ceftriaxone (95,4 %), la nitrofurantoïne (95,2 %), la céfoxitine (94,8 %), l&apos;amoxicilline-clavulanate (92,9 %) et la gentamicine (91,4 %). La céfazoline (89,4 %), les fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacine, 79,4 %, lévofloxacine, 79,9 %) et le triméthoprim-sulfaméthoxazole (75,7 %) étaient moins actifs. Dans le modèle multivarié, les isolats envahissants étaient associés de manière marquée à des taux de susceptibilité plus faibles pour le triméthoprim-sulfaméthoxazole. Le vieillissement s&apos;associait à une susceptibilité plus faible aux fluoroquinolones, à la ceftriaxone, à la suite page suivante Lagacé-Wiens et al Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Vol 20 Suppl A Spring 2009 50A E scherichia coli is the most commonly isolated clinically relevant Gram-negative organism in most health care settings (1-3). Although most commonly associated with urinary tract infections, all body sites can be involved. Furthermore, resistance to multiple antimicrobials is increasing and multidrug resistant (MDR; concurrent resistance to agents from three or more different antimicrobial classes) isolates are common (1,4,5). Appropriate empirical antimicrobial choice must take into account local resistance patterns and other demographic variables such as patient age, site and severity of infection, sex, inpatient status as well as previous antimicrobial use, stay in hospitals or personal care homes, and colonization with antimicrobial resistant organisms (1,6). The purpose of the present study was to provide an in-depth analysis of patient factors associated with drug resistance in the most commonly isolated organism overall in Canadian hospitals. MethODS E coli isolates were obtained as part of the Canadian Ward Surveillance Study (CANWARD 2007), which collected isolates submitted to 12 clinical microbiology laboratories from tertiary care hospitals in seven provinces across Canada. Submitting sites and collection strategy are described elsewhere in the present supplement (2). Isolates had to be deemed clinically significant by the referring laboratory&apos;s current specimen work-up protocol. Demographic information collected with each isolate included patient age, sex, site of infection and the location of patient contact (surgical or medical ward, emergency room, intensive care unit [ICU] or hospital clinic). A minimum number of isolates from each hospital location and anatomical site was requested to provide more power to the study. The implication of this collection strategy is that the anatomical distribution of pathogen isolation and inpatient versus outpatient distribution does not reflect the true distribution in the population studied. Isolates were collected within both primary and secondary study objectives and only isolates collected within the primary objective were considered in this analysis. For statistical analysis, age was divided into four categories: 20 years and younger, 21 to 60 years, 61 to 80 years, and 81 years and older, and location of patient contact was divided into either inpatient (wards and ICUs) or outpatient (emergency room and clinics). Information on previous antimicrobial exposure, hospitalization duration and underlying medical conditions was not available. Antimicrobial susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, levofloxacin, meropenem, ertapenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, tigecycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was determined using broth dilution as described elsewhere in the present supplement (2). Screening for ESBL production was achieved using a 1 µg/mL or greater ceftriaxone breakpoint and confirmation was with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-recommended disk diffusion method (7). Univariate analysis using the c 2 (or Fisher&apos;s exact test where required) was undertaken to identify relationships between susceptibility to each of the antimicrobials and ESBL production; and the following variables: sex, age group, inpatient/outpatient status and isolation from a sterile site (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, synovial fluid). Relationships where the P&lt;0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate nominal logistic regression model to determine independent explanatory variables. Initially, a full factorial multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using the potential explanatory variables identified in the univariate analysis for each antimicrobial, and then a backward selection so that all factors remaining in the model were statistically significant at a 5% level (P&lt;0.05). Statistical analysis was undertaken using JMP software version 7.0 (SAS Institute Inc, USA). ReSuLtS Of 7881 total organisms, 1702 E coli (21.6%) were collected from the CANWARD 2007 study, making it the most common organism isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals overall. Of these, 1560 fell within the primary objective and the remaining 142 were submitted as putative ESBL producers for separate analysis and excluded from the present analysis. The mean age of patients infected with E coli was 56.9 years; 12.3% of E coli isolates were from patients younger than 21 years, 34.7% were 21 to 60 years of age, 33.9% were 61 to 80 years of age and 19.1% were older than 80 years of age. There were more samples from women (59.3%); with both sexes combined, 50.5% were invasive isolates (all bloodstream), and 40.7% were from urine, 6.4% from respiratory sources and 2.4% from wounds. Note that the sampling strategy was biased to include a surplus of bloodstream isolates to have greater numbers of these for analysis and this does not represent the true source distribution of E coli infections. The distribution among provinces was British Columbia, 9.7%; Alberta, 7.6%; Saskatchewan, 9.1%; Manitoba, 9.2%; Ontario, 28.3%; Quebec, 29.2% and Nova Scotia, 6.9%. Isolates were not obtained from Newfoundland, Nunavut, the Northwest Territories, Yukon, New Brunswick or Prince Edward Island. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) required to inhibit 50% and 90% of organisms (MIC 50 , MIC 90 ) and percentage of isolates susceptible to the antimicrobials are provided in Resistance in E coli from Canadian inpatients and outpatients Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol DISCuSSION Low susceptibility of ICU E coli isolates to fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was not unexpected given the wide use of these antimicrobials in both inpatients and outpatients. In particular, the dramatic increase in fluoroquinolone resistance has been observed in many settings (8-10). Our observations suggest that first-generation cephalosporins and amoxicillin-clavulanate are still useful agents for infections caused by E coli in that susceptibility rates remain near 90% overall. This is particularly true of outpatient isolates where susceptibility is greater than 90% for both these agents. On the contrary, low susceptibility to fluoroquinolones even in the outpatient setting (84%) begins to bring into question the use of these agents as first line for infections commonly caused by E coli, such as urinary tract infections. Trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole susceptibility rates are below 80% in both inpatient and outpatient settings and should only be used for infections empirically in the context of supportive data from local antibiograms or definitive susceptibility data. In our multivariate model, increasing age was independently associated with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, ceftriaxone, cefepime, gentamicin and ESBL production. The association between age and fluoroquinolone susceptibility has been demonstrated previously and is likely due to increasing exposure to fluoroquinolones over time and avoidance of fluoroquinolone use in children Predictably, inpatient isolates had lower susceptibility to several antibiotics, including amoxicillin-clavulanate, fluoroquinolones, cefazolin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Interestingly, susceptibility to antimicrobials commonly used in the inpatient setting (ceftriaxone, cefepime, gentamicin, carbapenems and piperacillin-tazobactam) did not appear to be significantly affected by inpatient status. This is reassuring in that these antimicrobials maintain good activity overall in the hospital setting. The reason that antimicrobials commonly used in the community are most affected by inpatient status is not known, but may be due to general practitioners using these antimicrobials to treat outpatients and selection bias occurring because poor response due to antimicrobial resistance requires admission for parenteral antimicrobials. Interestingly, sex was not a predictor of susceptibility to any of the antimicrobials tested after adjusting for other factors in the multivariate model. Although large differences were seen between susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, both inpatient status and age appeared to be confounding factors in the effect of sex on fluoroquinolone resistance. The absence of a sex effect contradicts the findings of others Meropenem, ertapenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, tigecycline and cefoxitin were not significantly associated with any demographic variable in the multivariate model. Low overall resistance rates accounts for these observations. Our study had some limitations. We could not collect patient information such as length of stay, previous antimicrobial exposure and underlying disease. Although of great interest for the prediction of antimicrobial resistance, the effect of these variables cannot be determined with our data. Also, our isolates reflect only information from the 12 centres studied and our data may not reflect the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of all hospitals in Canada. However, this study does provide valuable information about the factors predicting antimicrobial susceptibility of E coli in one of the largest of inpatient and outpatient populations in Canada studied to date