Adherence to disease-modifying therapies among patients with multiple sclerosis in Bulgaria – A real world study

Introduction: The purpose was to assess the level of medication adherence (MA) and related factors among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Bulgaria. Materials and methods: A prospective one-year study was conducted among 54 patients with MS diagnosed, treated, and monitored in Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital “Alexandrovska”, Sofia in 2022/2023. Clinical data, patients reported outcomes, patients’ characteristics such as age, gender and reduced work capacity, and other data were collected to define the predictors of non-adherence to medicines. MA level was assessed through a free Morisky–Green 4-item questionnaire. Results: Мost of the observed patients were rated with high and moderate adherence to MS therapy (n = 44; 81.48%). The remaining 18.52% of the patients with poor adherence to therapy were women. There was no statistical basis for asserting differences in adherence levels among the various factors considered. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates the importance of MA assessment and provides insights into MA among patients with MS in Bulgaria. Still, there are low-adherent patients, and the responsible factors should be further investigated

Pilot Study on the Cost of Some Oncohematology Diseases in Bulgaria

The goal of the current study is to perform a pilot study of the cost of some oncohematology diseases in Bulgaria. This is a pilot broader burden of disease research. The official report of the National health insurance fund provided information about the total expenditures paid for medicines, ambulatory services, and hospitalizations in 2015 and 2016. To evaluate the costs from a patient perspective, an internet inquiry was organized with the support of the patient organization. The inquiry contained questions regarding the patients' demography, type of oncohematology disease, year of diagnosis, quality of life (EuroQol v5D), and additional out of pocket expenditures. Quality of Life data were statistically analyzed and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was performed. From 2015 to 2016 the number of patients with oncohematological diseases decreased by approximately 3000 people. Less than 30% were hospitalized and the hospitalization cost decreased, but the cost for medicines increased by nearly 1.5 million Euros. Cost for medicines almost tripled the hospitalization cost. The reported mean quality of life was 0.749 (SD 0.203). There was positive correlation between QoL and current disease state (p = 0.008) and age (p = 0.025). 42% reported to have additional expenditures related to their oncohematology disease, 22% reported other expenditures (diet, change of everyday habits etc.) and 42% reported to have productivity loses due to loss of employment or change of work, 44% of the respondents reported additional payment for medicines for concomitant diseases. Thus, the total cost (public funds and patients) accounted for 37,708,764 Euro. Despite the high public expenditures, the indirect costs due to productivity loses are higher. Costs for medicines are higher than costs of inpatient treatment, but this tendency is observed in all European countries. The increases in the costs of medicines are compensated by reduced costs of hospitalization. Despite their higher costs, newer medicines are an effective and reasonable investment from a societal perspective. Currently the higher levels of copayment increase the burden on the patients

The health related quality of life for kidney transplant patients in Bulgaria - A pilot study

The aim of the present study was to analyze the pharmacotherapy cost and quality of life of patents after kidney transplantation compared to those with chronic kidney disease in Bulgaria. This retrospective pharmacotherapy cost study and prospective health related quality of life (QoL) study was performed during 2010 - 2011 at the biggest Sofia hospital serving all transplant patients. The cost of pharmacotherapy was analyzed after reviewing patients' records. The health related quality of life was evaluated with the multi-attributable questionnaire SF-36, which measures 9 health domains. Forty-two percent of the patients with chronic kidney disease, and 26% of those with kidney transplant were female. The average age of the transplanted patients was 39.7 for male patients and 42.2 for female ones, while in the group suffering from chronic kidney disease the average male age was 48.3 and that of female patients, 51.2. No statistically significant difference was observed among the mean monthly cost of therapy per patient during the two-year period. The QoL was with lower values in the role limitations domain for patients with chronic kidney diseases and this difference was statistically significant. We found a correlation among the mean cost of pharmacotherapy and mean QoL in both groups of patients. In the group of patients with kidney transplantation the place of living and general health state were positively correlated. The cost of pharmacotherapy and the health state in comparison with the previous year were also positively correlated. This is the first Bulgarian study of the quality of life of kidney transplant patients. It shows that the SF-36 could be successfully used in this group of patients as well as for comparison with the QoL of patients with chronic kidney disease

A health-related quality of life and pharmacotherapy costs study for patients with cystic fybrosis, gaucher disease and chronic myeloid leukemia in Bulgaria

The aim of the present study was to analyze the cost of pharmacotherapy and quality of life of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), Gaucher disease (GD) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in Bulgaria. Data for the pharmacotherapy cost were compiled retrospectively. The second part of the study included a prospective quality-of-life survey (conducted at the Medical University Hospital "Alexandrovska" in 2010 and 2011). We estimated the average monthly pharmacotherapy costs according to data from the hospital registries. The quality-of-life survey was done through interviews based on the short form of SF-36, which measures 9 health domains. The total number of patients was 18, of which 10 were with CML, 5 with cystic fibrosis and 3 with Gaucher disease. The average age of the male and female patients with CML was 49.1 years and 48.3 years, respectively; 25 and 24 years in the group with GD, respectively; and 29.5 and 35.3 years in CF group, respectively. No statistical difference between the average monthly pharmacotherapy costs for the observed period was revealed In all patients the quality of life was below the maximum possible value, which is equal to 100 points. The lowest values for the different indicators of quality of life were observed in the CF patients, most likely due to the chronic progression of this particular rare disease. The average range of quality of life for this group was 53.75. We found a statistical correlation between the pharmacotherapy costs and the quality of life. The Spearman correlation analysis revealed a correlation between the drug therapy costs and some quality-of-life indicators only in the patients with CIVIL. The correlation between the pharmacotherapy costs and physiological functions in patients with CIVIL was positive, i.e. higher costs improved this indicator The pharmacotherapy costs were high, the average values for the three groups of patients being: BGN 9221.61 for 2010 and BGN 8254.64 for January March 2011 for patients with CF, BGN 32954.08 for those with GD, and BGN 6389.38 for 2010 and BGN 6591.19 for the second period for the CML patients. The quality of life was significantly reduced for the observed patients: the average value for quality of life were 53.75, 65.03 and 67, respectively, from a maximum of 100

Comparative Price Analysis of Biological Products for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Biological products for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis usually are cost effective for healthcare systems in Europe, but they are huge financial burden due to the high number of patients and the significant budget impact. The expected saving from introduction on the market of biosimilars are significant and are linked to better access and affordability. The aim of this study was to conduct comparative price analysis of biological products for rheumatoid arthritis therapy among seventeen EU countries. The point of view is that of the Bulgarian pricing and reimbursement system and the chosen countries are those from external reference basket for prices comparison at manufacturing level. All authorized biological products by EMA with therapeutic indication rheumatoid arthritis were selected. The access for treatment is evaluated as the availability of the product on the market and the prices level. We assessed the availability of all trade names in the price lists of the observed countries. The prices data was obtained from the official web pages of the responsible institutions up to date December 2017. The results show that four out of all six INNs have authorized biosimilars in EMA. Despite its earlier authorization biosimilar adalimumab is not present in any of the price lists of countries. From all eighteen countries only in Lithuania and Estonia there were no published prices of any of the selected medicinal products. Countries with higher number of biosimilar prices are Spain and France. Differences in manufacturers’ prices of reference biological products in selected countries in comparison with the lowest manufacturer price are higher with 22 to 69% while the retail prices between 62 and 95%. Differences are mostly notable for rituximab, and less notable for tocilizumab. Manufacturers’ and retail prices of biosimilar products were established only for three INNs (etanercept, rituximab, and infliximab). Manufacturers’ prices differ between 26 and 75%, while retail prices differ between 40 and 92% for biosimilars. Comparison of the differences between manufacturer prices of reference biological product and biosimilars shows 36% difference for etanercept, 39% for rituximab, and 31% for infliximab, while at retail level the differences are 11, 86, and 143%, respectively. The limitation of the study is that the prices are the official ones without discounts due to confidentiality and the real prices may be lower. The second limitation is that the methodology for pricing differs in the countries and this could also influence the prices on both levels (manufacturer and retail). Introduction of biosimilars on the national markets led to significant decrease in reimbursed prices paid by public funds and thus might benefit the patients’ access to biological therapy. The decrease of prices after biosimilars entrance on the market is not as notable as for commodity generics

Incretins and SGLT-2i Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes – Real Life Study of Their Therapeutic and Economic Effects

AimIncretins [dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 RA (GLP-1 RA)] and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) groups are now routinely used for type 2 diabetes therapy and comprise a large number of medicinal products. The long term therapeutic and economic effect of the incretins’ and SGLT-2i in real life setting is not well documented. The goal of the current study is to analyze the cost and results of incretins and SGLT-2i based therapy for type 2 diabetes in Bulgaria.MethodsThe study uses information about the changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from the National diabetes register for 6122 patients and cost paid by the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) for diabetes complications, and medicine prices.ResultsThe results show that after the therapy patients achieved excellent diabetes control. There were no HbA1c values less than 6% before treatment. After the therapy, 3356 people showed values less than 7% HbA1c. It is considered very good diabetic control. The number of people with HbA1c above 8% is decreasing significantly. The number of people with values above 9% is decreasing by almost four times. HbA1c level decreases with the highest percentage for the patients treated with GLP-1 RA, followed by those treated with DPP-4i and SGLT-2i. For a year NHIF reimbursed 5.25 million BGN for incretins and SGLT-2i therapy. NHIF can save between 306 and 510 thousand BGN from incidents that have not occurred as a result of 5 years of therapy.ConclusionIncretins [dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA)] and sodium-glucose linked transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) therapy steadily decreases the HbA1c level, and risk of developing diabetic incidents is reduced to between 333 and 465 cases among 6122 treated patients. Avoided cost for therapy of diabetes incidents account for between 305 and 510 thousand BGN

Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries

Patients' perspectives are important to identify preferences, estimate values and appreciate unmet medical needs in the process of research and development and subsequent assessment of new health technologies. Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in understanding and assessing wider implications of coverage and reimbursement decisions for patients, their relatives, caregivers, and the general population. There are two approaches to incorporating the patients' voice in HTA, preferably used in a mix. In the first one, patients, caregivers and/or their representatives directly participate at discussions in different stages of the HTA process, often at the same table with other stakeholders. Secondly, patient involvement activities can be supported by evidence on patient value and experience collected directly from patients, caregivers and/or their representatives often by patient groups Patient involvement practices, however, are limited in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries without clear methodology or regulatory mechanisms to guide patient involvement in the HTA process. This poses the question of transferability of practices used in other countries, and might call for the development of new CEE-specific guidelines and methods. In this study we aim to map potential barriers of patient involvement in HTA in countries of the CEE region

Guidance on using real-world evidence from Western Europe in Central and Eastern European health policy decision making

Aim: Real-world data and real-world evidence (RWE) are becoming more important for healthcare decision making and health technology assessment. We aimed to propose solutions to overcome barriers preventing Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries from using RWE generated in Western Europe. Materials & methods: To achieve this, following a scoping review and a webinar, the most important barriers were selected through a survey. A workshop was held with CEE experts to discuss proposed solutions. Results: Based on survey results, we selected the nine most important barriers. Multiple solutions were proposed, for example, the need for a European consensus, and building trust in using RWE. Conclusion: Through collaboration with regional stakeholders, we proposed a list of solutions to overcome barriers on transferring RWE from Western Europe to CEE countries. Plain language summary: Collecting real-world data and generating real-world evidence from it is becoming more important for making better decisions in healthcare. We investigated the main barriers which prevent using real-world evidence in Central and Eastern Europe, originally generated in Western Europe. After identifying the nine most important barrier, with the help of local experts we proposed solutions to overcome those barriers. Several possible solutions were proposed, many of them highlighting the need for a European consensus on these matters and building trust in new methods. Our results can hopefully serve as a guidance document to help overcome the barriers. Tweetable abstract: Research investigating ways to overcome barriers preventing Central and Eastern European countries from using Western European real-world evidence for healthcare decision making, using a multi-methods approach to create a list of solutions in collaboration with local stakeholders

The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products

Funding of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) is an increasing challenge in the European Union (EU).To identify the different methods for public funding of OMPs in order to map the availability for rare disease patients, as well as to compare the public expenditures on OMPs in 8 EU member states.Information on the reimbursement status of 83 OMPs was collected in 8 countries by distinguishing standard and special reimbursements. In two consecutive years, the total public expenditures on OMPs were calculated by using annual EUR exchange rates. Annual total public expenditures were calculated per capita, and as a proportion of GDP, total public pharmaceutical and healthcare budgets. Differences between countries were compared by calculating the deviations from the average spending of countries.In 2015 29.4-92.8% of the 83 OMPs were available with any kind of public reimbursement in participant countries including special reimbursement on an individual basis. In Austria, Belgium and France more OMPs were accessible for patients with public reimbursement than in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Standard reimbursement through retail pharmacies and/or hospitals was applied from 0 to 41% of OMPs. The average annual total public expenditure ranged between 1.4-23.5 €/capita in 2013 and 2014. Higher income countries spent more OMPs in absolute terms. Participant countries spent 0.018-0.066% of their GDPs on funding OMPs. Average expenditures on OMPs were ranged between 2.25-6.51% of the public pharmaceutical budget, and 0.44-0.96% of public healthcare expenditures.Standard and special reimbursement techniques play different roles in participant countries. The number of accessible OMPs indicated an equity gap between Eastern and Western Europe. The spending on OMPs as a proportion of GDP, public pharmaceutical and healthcare expenditure was not higher in lower income countries, which indicates substantial differences in patient access to OMPs in favour of higher-income countries. Equity in access for patients with rare diseases is an important policy objective in each member state of the EU; however, equity in access should be harmonized at the European level

Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries

IntroductionMeaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the Horizon2020 HTx project, this research aimed to form recommendations for critical barriers to patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. MethodsBuilt on previous research findings on potential barriers, a prioritisation survey was conducted online with CEE stakeholders. Recommendations for prioritised barriers were formed through a face-to-face workshop by CEE stakeholders and HTx experts. ResultsA total of 105 stakeholders from 13 CEE countries completed the prioritisation survey and identified 12 of the 22 potential barriers as highly important. The workshop had 36 participants representing 9 CEE countries, and 5 Western European countries coming together to discuss solutions in order to form recommendations based on best practices, real-life experience, and transferability aspects. Stakeholder groups involved in both phases included HTA organisation representatives, payers, patients, caregivers, patient organisation representatives, patient experts, health care providers, academic and non-academic researchers, health care consultants and health technology manufacturers/providers. As a result, 12 recommendations were formed specified to the CEE region's context, but potentially useful for a broader geographic audience. ConclusionIn this paper, we present 12 recommendations for meaningful, systematic, and sustainable patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Our hope is that engaging more than a hundred CEE stakeholders in the study helped to spread awareness of the importance and potential of patient involvement and that the resulting recommendations provide tangible steps for the way forward. Future studies shall focus on country-specific case studies of the implemented recommendations