High Stakes: Throwing a Hail Mary to Congress for a Federal Ban on Sports Betting in College Athletics

The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision overruling the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s (“PASPA”) federal prohibition on sports betting as unconstitutional under the Tenth Amendment has cleared the way for states to legalize sports gambling, which, in turn, has proven a controversial subject. Supporters of state legalization of sports gambling “argue that legalization will generate revenue for states and critically weaken illegal sports betting operations, which are often commissioned by organized crime.” However, as the Supreme Court notes, opponents contend that the legalization of sports betting will expose America’s youth to accessible gambling, “encourage people of modest means to squander their savings, and corrupt both professional and college sports.” This Note details the history of sports betting in the United States predating the passage of PASPA in 1992 and discusses PASPA’s intent to protect players and the public from the risk and corruption that accompanies sports wagering. It evaluates PASPA’s eventual overruling and argues that legalized sports betting is especially dangerous in the realm of college athletics. While gambling in any sports league provides opportunities for scandal and corruption, Congress should take action to ban gambling in collegiate and other amateur sports in particular, as these contexts pose a heightened risk for corruption predicated on the athletes’ youthfulness and vulnerability. We should not gamble with the integrity of our colleges or the futures of our college athletes. Our young athletes deserve legal protection from the seedy influences of gambling, and fans deserve to know that athletic competitions are honest and fair

Non-Permanent Migration and Multilocality in the Global South

see articl

Living in Two Worlds: Multi-Locational Household Arrangements among Migrant Workers in China

In the past, the concept of multi-locality has hardly been applied to the study of livelihood strategies of migrant workers in China. The authors of this article present the findings of a research project in five selected rural-urban migration corridors in different parts of China. On the basis of qualitative interviews at both ends of the multi-locational households’ activity spaces, they were able to establish economic reciprocity, strategies for caring and the transfer of knowledge, values and beliefs at the household level. The multi-locational households – defined as units of joint planning – were found to be firmly embedded in informal social networks

Friends and Symptom Dimensions in Patients with Psychosis: A Pooled Analysis

PMCID: PMC3503760This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited