Egenkapitalutvidelser ved Oslo Børs 1980-2009

..

Topics in accounting for impairment of fixed assets

This dissertation consists of three topics related to the accounting for impairment of fixed assets, represented by five papers. The first topic is an empirical research into the functionality of the new generation of impairment standards. The second topic is an analytical discussion of one particular measurement aspect of the new impairment standards, which is their mandated discounting technique and the treatment of future tax cash flows. The third topic is a historical research into the origins of impairment accounting. The historical topic is covered by two papers. “The international background for the development of Norwegian accounting rules on the impairment of fixed assets” (Chapter 5) traces the origins of the Norwegian write-down rules. The second historical paper, “Fixed asset measurements in a Norwegian shipping company 1935 – 1985” (Chapter 6) is about how the accounting measurement of ships and the disclosures about it developed during half a century in a Norwegian joint stock shipping company, Snefonn. Summaries of these chapters are given in Sections 1.5 and 1.6. In Section 1.7, I indicate the main findings of my doctoral work and suggest further research

Classification and Measurement under IFRS 9:A Commentary and Suggestions for Future Research

This paper discusses several issues that were raised by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in their request for information for the post-implementation review (PIR) of the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9: Financial instruments–Classification and Measurement. In doing so, we first review the related academic literature and present empirical evidence on the post-adoption impact of IFRS 9. We then discuss conceptual issues associated with the business model and cash flow characteristics assessment in IFRS 9, as well as issues associated with the presentation of fair value changes in other comprehensive income (OCI) and modifications to contractual cash flows. Finally, we identify gaps in the literature and provide suggestions for future research that can help inform accounting standard setters

Impairment no setor público: particularidades das normas nacionais e internacionais Impairment in the public sector: particularities of Brazilian and international standards

O impairment no setor público tem sido pouco discutido no meio acadêmico. Os órgãos normatizadores têm publicado pronunciamentos sobre o assunto, enquanto muitas dúvidas surgem e permanecem sem resposta. Diante disso, este artigo analisa as particularidades de normas nacionais e internacionais balizadoras do impairment no setor público: o Gasb 42, os Ipsas 21 e 26 e a NBC T 16.10. Foram analisados aspectos relacionados ao conceito de impairment, à periodicidade de aplicação do teste, para quais ativos deve ser aplicado e o processo de reconhecimento, mensuração e evidenciação da perda por impairment. As principais divergências entre os pronunciamentos são: o Gasb 42 está baseado em princípios e não em regras; os critérios utilizados pelo Gasb 42 para cálculo do fair value são semelhantes àqueles usados pelos Ipsas 21 e 26 para cálculo do valor em uso; o valor de reposição é usado para cálculo do fair value no Gasb 42 e o valor de saída nos Ipsas; apenas o Ipsas 26 utiliza a figura da unidade geradora de caixa; o Gasb 42 não admite a reversão da perda por impairment e os Ipsas não se aplicam a bens reavaliados. Apesar da NBC T 16.10 já estar em vigor no Brasil, todos os ativos públicos e a depreciação precisam ser reconhecidos e mensurados antes da aplicação dessa norma<br>Little discussion on impairment in the public sector has occurred in the academic context. Standardizing bodies have published pronouncements on this issue, but many doubts arise and remain unanswered. This article analyzes the particularities of Brazilian and international standards guiding impairment in the public sector: Gasb 42, Ipsas 21 and 26 and NBC T 16.10. The aspects analyzed were related to the impairment concept, the periodicity of applying the test, what assets it should be applied to and the recognition, measurement and disclosure process of impairment loss. The main divergences between the pronouncements are: Gasb 42 is based on principles instead of rules; the criteria Gasb 42 uses to calculate the fair value are similar to the criteria Ipsas 21 and 26 use to calculate the value in use; the replacement cost is used to calculate fair value in Gasb 42 and the outflow value in both Ipsas; only Ipsas 26 uses the figure of cash-generating unit; Gasb 42 does not permit the reversal of impairment loss and the Ipsas do not apply to revalued goods. Although NBC T 16.10 is already in force in Brazil, all public assets and depreciation need to be recognized and measured before this standard is applie