42 research outputs found

    Brachytherapy structural shielding calculations using Monte Carlo generated, monoenergetic data

    Get PDF
    To provide a method for calculating the transmission of any broad photon beam with a known energy spectrum in the range of 20 keV-1090 keV, through concrete and lead, based on the superposition of corresponding monoenergetic data obtained from Monte Carlo simulation

    Dosimetric accuracy of a deterministic radiation transport based 192Ir brachytherapy treatment planning system: Part III. Comparison to Monte Carlo simulation in voxelized anatomical computational models

    Get PDF
    To compare TG43-based and Acuros deterministic radiation transport-based calculations of the BrachyVision treatment planning system (TPS) with corresponding Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results in heterogeneous patient geometries, in order to validate Acuros and quantify the accuracy improvement it marks relative to TG43

    On the use of polymer gels for assessing the total geometrical accuracy in clinical Gamma Knife radiosurgery applications

    Get PDF
    The nearly tissue equivalent MRI properties and the unique ability of registering 3D dose distributions of polymer gels were exploited to assess the total geometrical accuracy in clinical Gamma Knife applications, taking into account the combined effect of the unit’s mechanical accuracy, dose delivery precision and the geometrical distortions inherent in MR images used for irradiation planning. Comparison between planned and experimental data suggests that the MR-related distortions due to susceptibility effects dominate the total clinical geometrical accuracy which was found within 1 mm. The dosimetric effect of the observed sub-millimetre uncertainties on single shot GK irradiation plans was assessed using the target percentage coverage criterion, and a considerable target dose underestimation was found

    A comparative assessment of inhomogeneity and finite patient dimension effects in 60Co and 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy

    No full text
    Purpose: To perform a comparative study of heterogeneities and finite patient dimension effects in 60Co and 192Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Material and methods: Clinically equivalent plans were prepared for 19 cases (8 breast, 5 esophagus, 6 gynecologic) using the Ir2.A85-2 and the Co0.A86 HDR sources, with a TG-43 based treatment planning system (TPS). Phase space files were obtained for the two source designs using MCNP6, and validated through comparison to a single source dosimetry results in the literature. Dose to water, taking into account the patient specific anatomy and materials (Dw,m), was calculated for all plans using MCNP6, with input files prepared using the BrachyGuide software tool to analyze information from DICOM RT plan exports. Results: A general TG-43 dose overestimation was observed, except for the lungs, with a greater magnitude for 192Ir. The distribution of percentage differences between TG-43 and Monte Carlo (MC) in dose volume histogram (DVH) indices for the planning target volume (PTV) presented small median values (about 2%) for both 60Co and 192Ir, with a greater dispersion for 192Ir. Regarding the organs at risk (OARs), median percentage differences for breast V50% were 3% (5%) for 60Co (192Ir). Differences in median skin D2cc were found comparable, with a larger dispersion for 192Ir, and the same applied to the lung D10cc and the aorta D2cc. TG-43 overestimates D2cc for the rectum and the sigmoid, with median differences from MC within 2% and a greater dispersion for 192Ir. For the bladder, the median of the difference is greater for 60Co (∼2%) than for 192Ir (∼0.75%), demonstrating however a greater dispersion again for 192Ir. Conclusions: The magnitude of differences observed between TG-43 based and MC dosimetry and their smaller dispersion relative to 192Ir, suggest that 60Co HDR sources are more amenable to the TG-43 assumptions in clinical treatment planning dosimetry. © J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018

    On source models for 192Ir HDR brachytherapy dosimetry using model based algorithms

    No full text
    A source model is a prerequisite of all model based dose calculation algorithms. Besides direct simulation, the use of pre-calculated phase space files (phsp source models) and parameterized phsp source models has been proposed for Monte Carlo (MC) to promote efficiency and ease of implementation in obtaining photon energy, position and direction. In this work, a phsp file for a generic 192Ir source design (Ballester et al 2015) is obtained from MC simulation. This is used to configure a parameterized phsp source model comprising appropriate probability density functions (PDFs) and a sampling procedure. According to phsp data analysis 15.6% of the generated photons are absorbed within the source, and 90.4% of the emergent photons are primary. The PDFs for sampling photon energy and direction relative to the source long axis, depend on the position of photon emergence. Photons emerge mainly from the cylindrical source surface with a constant probability over ±0.1 cm from the center of the 0.35 cm long source core, and only 1.7% and 0.2% emerge from the source tip and drive wire, respectively. Based on these findings, an analytical parameterized source model is prepared for the calculation of the PDFs from data of source geometry and materials, without the need for a phsp file. The PDFs from the analytical parameterized source model are in close agreement with those employed in the parameterized phsp source model. This agreement prompted the proposal of a purely analytical source model based on isotropic emission of photons generated homogeneously within the source core with energy sampled from the 192Ir spectrum, and the assignment of a weight according to attenuation within the source. Comparison of single source dosimetry data obtained from detailed MC simulation and the proposed analytical source model show agreement better than 2% except for points lying close to the source longitudinal axis. © 2016 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine

    Brachytherapy structural shielding calculations using Monte Carlo generated, monoenergetic data

    No full text
    Purpose: To provide a method for calculating the transmission of any broad photon beam with a known energy spectrum in the range of 20-1090 keV, through concrete and lead, based on the superposition of corresponding monoenergetic data obtained from Monte Carlo simulation. Methods: MCNP5 was used to calculate broad photon beam transmission data through varying thickness of lead and concrete, for monoenergetic point sources of energy in the range pertinent to brachytherapy (20-1090 keV, in 10 keV intervals). The three parameter empirical model introduced byArcher et al. ["Diagnostic x-ray shielding design based on an empirical model of photon attenuation," Health Phys. 44, © 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. © 2014 Am. Assoc. Phys. Med

    A retrospective dosimetric comparison of TG43 and a commercially available MBDCA for an APBI brachytherapy patient cohort

    No full text
    Purpose: To compare dosimetry using a contemporary model based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA) following TG186 recommendations, and the conventional TG43 method in an 192Ir high dose rate (HDR) accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) patient cohort. Methods: Data of 38 APBI patients were studied. Dosimetry for the treatment plans was performed using both the TG43 and TG186 dose calculation methods of the Oncentra Brachy v4.4 treatment planning system (TPS). Analysis included indices of clinical interest for the planning target volume (PTV coverage, dose homogeneity, conformity) as well as dose volume histograms (DVH) for the breast, lung, heart, rib and skin. Significance testing of observed differences between TG43 and TG186 results was carried out and the effect of target location to these differences was studied. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the values of clinically relevant DVH parameters for the PTV and the organs at risk (OAR), except for the heart. Differences for the PTV are relatively small (<1% for coverage, on the order of 2% for homogeneity and conformity) with a slight TG43 overestimation except for the dose homogeneity. Percentage differences are larger for the rib and lung (on the order of 4% for Dmax and 5% for V10Gy, respectively) and maximum for the skin (on the order of 6% for D10cc), with a correlation of the observed differences with target location. Conclusion: While the MBDCA option of the TPS appears to improve dosimetric accuracy, differences from TG43 do not appear to warrant dose prescription changes or treatment protocol amendment. © 2015 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica
    corecore