IMAGINE-IMpact Assessment of Guidelines Implementation and Education : The Next Frontier for Harmonising Urological Practice Across Europe by Improving Adherence to Guidelines

Funding support: The IMAGINE ADT audit is supported by a seeding grant from the EAU Research Foundation.Peer reviewedPostprin

Impact of a nutritional supplement (Impryl) on male fertility: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (SUppleMent Male fERtility, SUMMER trial)

INTRODUCTION: Infertility is a worldwide problem and about 10%-15% of all couples will be affected by the inability to have children. In approximately 50% of infertile couples, a male factor is involved. Most of the male infertile cases are characterised as 'idiopathic', except for a small percentage of cases which are causative by a genetic aetiology. In the past decade, the role of oxidative stress related to sperm quality has been researched thoroughly and estimated to be the problem in 25%-87% of male infertility cases. Impryl is a nutritional supplement which works on the metabolic system and the regulation of oxidative stress by activating the 1-carbon cycle and therefore recycling of homocysteine. We hypothesise that the nutritional supplement Impryl in men of infertile couples might improve the ongoing pregnancy rate. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. We aimed to include 1200 male adults aged 18-50 years, part of a couple that is diagnosed with infertility. The couple will either start or has already been started with fertility treatment, that is, expectative management (duration of 6 months), intrauterine insemination (IUI) with or without mild ovarian stimulation or ovulation induction, either in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Male participants will be randomised in either the Impryl or the placebo group, with identical appearance of the tablets to be distributed (doses: one tablet each day), for a total duration of maximal 6 months. Patients can start directly with fertility treatment and/or natural conception. The primary outcome is the number of ongoing pregnancies confirmed by ultrasound at ≥10 to 12 weeks, and conceived in the time window between randomisation up to and including month 6 of intervention use. Secondary outcomes are change in semen parameters between baseline and after 3 months of intervention in the IUI/IVF/ICSI group, based on (prewash) total motile sperm count. Furthermore the number of pregnancies conceived in the optimal intervention time window (after full spermatogenesis of 72 days), overall number of pregnancies, time to pregnancy, embryo fertilisation rate in IVF/ICSI, embryo-utilisation rate in IVF/ICSI, number of miscarriages, live birth rate and adverse events are documented within the study period of 15 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the local medical ethical review committee at the Radboud University Medical Centre and by the national Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. Findings will be shared with the academic and medical community, funding and patient organisations in order to contribute to optimisation of medical care and quality of life for patients with infertility. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT03337360 and NTR6551

Needs of children with a chronic bladder in preparation for transfer to adult care

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: Transfers to adult care can be problematic, resulting in postponement due to the protective nature of pediatric care and patient dependency. It is unknown whether these findings apply specifically to urology patients. Our department is taking part in a national general transition project. In this light, our aim was to investigate the specific needs of adolescent urologic patients, regarding their independence and transition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 80 patients, born in 1975-1998, with a chronic bladder condition received a questionnaire. They were divided into pre- and post-transfer groups. Parents (n = 7) of post-transfer patients formed a third group. Questionnaires were based on those used in the national transition study, supplemented with urological questions. Pre-transfer patients were asked about their level of independence, what subjects were discussed during consultations, and their expectations and wishes regarding transfer. Post-transfer patients and parents were asked for their opinions on the transfer process. RESULTS: 73% (n = 58) responded (55 pre-transfer and 3 post-transfer patients plus parents). It appeared that the confidence built-up with the pediatric urologist impeded the transfer. An adequate level of disease-related knowledge was reported. Relationships, sexuality and fertility were hardly talked about (respectively n = 17, 16 and 18). Parents played an important role, which patients appreciated, confirming their dependency. Despite the 49% (n = 27) who stated they can arrange their urological care themselves, 44% (n = 24) felt ill-prepared for transfer. CONCLUSION: Although overall self-perceived knowledge is sufficient, the trust in and personal relationship with the pediatric urologist formed the greatest obstruction to successful transition. These findings have been used to improve support during transition by creating a transition protocol

Klinefelter syndrome and fertility: sperm preservation should not be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome

STUDY QUESTION: Should fertility preservation be offered to children with Klinefelter syndrome (KS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Current evidence shows that fertility preservation should not be offered to adolescents with KS younger than 16 years because of lower retrieval rates for germ cells by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) compared with retrieval rates for adolescents and adults between 16 and 30 years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: KS, the most common chromosomal disorder in men leading to non-obstructive azoospermia, is caused by the presence of at least one additional X chromosome. The onset of puberty in adolescents with KS leads to progressive degeneration of the testicular environment. The impact of the subsequent tissue degeneration on fertility potential of patients with KS is unknown, but in previous literature it has been suggested that fertility preservation should be started in adolescents as early as possible. However spermatozoa can be found by TESE in about 50% of adults with KS despite severe testicular degeneration. This review discusses the current evidence for fertility preservation in children and adolescents and possible prognostic markers for fertility treatment in KS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An extensive literature search was conducted, searching Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl and Web of Science from origin until April 2016 for 'Klinefelter syndrome' and 'fertility' and various synonyms. Titles and abstracts have been scanned manually by the authors for eligibility. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In total 76 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in this review. Information from the papers was extracted separately by two authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Various studies have shown that pre-pubertal children with KS already have a reduced number of germ cells despite a normal hormonal profile during childhood. The presence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate of adolescents with KS is extremely rare. Using TESE, the retrieval rates of spermatozoa for adolescents younger than 16 years old are much lower (0-20%) compared with those for adolescents and young adults between 16 and 30 years old (40-70%). Although spermatogonia can be found by TESE in about half of the peri-pubertal adolescents, there are currently no clinically functional techniques for their future use. Children and adolescents need to be informed that early fertility preservation before the age of 16 cannot guarantee fertility later in life and may even reduce the chances for offspring by removing functional immature germ cells which may possibly develop into spermatozoa after puberty. Furthermore, except for the age of patients with KS, there are no identified factors that can reliably be used as a predictive marker for fertility preservation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Most of the evidence presented in this review is based on studies including a small number of adolescents with KS. Therefore, the studies may have been underpowered to detect clinically significant differences for their various outcomes, especially for potential predictive factors for fertility preservation, such as hormone levels. Furthermore, the population of patients with KS diagnosed during childhood might be different from the adult population with KS where the diagnosis is based on infertility. Results based on comparisons between the two groups must be interpreted with caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Despite the limitations, this review summarizes the current evidence for managing fertility preservation in patients with KS to provide optimal health care. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: There was no funding for this study. S.F., Y.H., K.D., W.L.M.N., D.S., H.L.C.-v.d.G. and L.R. declare to have no conflicts of interests. D.D.M.B. reports grants from Merck Serono, grants from Ferring and grants from MSD, outside the submitted work. K.F. reports personal fees from MSD (commercial sponsor), personal fees from Ferring (commercial sponsor), grants from Merck-Serono (commercial sponsor), grants from Ferring (commercial sponsor) and grants from MSD (commercial sponsor), outside the submitted work