Ergonomic risk: social representations of dental students

Objective: To learn the social representations of ergonomic risk prepared ​​by dental students. Methodology: This exploratory study, subsidized the Theory of Social Representations, with 64 dental students of an educational institution, by means of interviews. The data were processed in Alceste4.8 and lexical analysis done by the descending hierarchical classification. Results: In two categories: knowledge about exposure to ergonomic risk end attitude of students on preventing and treating injuries caused by repetitive motion. For students, the ergonomic risk is related to the attitude in the dental office. Conclusion: Prevention of ergonomic risk for dental students has not been incorporated as a set of necessary measures for their health and the patients, to prevent ergonomic hazards that can result in harm to the patient caused by work-related musculoskeletal disorder, which is reflected in a lower quality practice

Urological assessment in 22 consecutive patients with confirmed Congenital Zika Syndrome.

<p>Urological assessment in 22 consecutive patients with confirmed Congenital Zika Syndrome.</p

Post-void residual measured during urodynamic study in 22 consecutive patients with Congenital Zika Syndrome and microcephaly.

<p>Post-void residual measured during urodynamic study in 22 consecutive patients with Congenital Zika Syndrome and microcephaly.</p

Urodynamic parameters measured in 22 consecutive patients with Congenital Zika Syndrome and microcephaly.

<p>Urodynamic parameters measured in 22 consecutive patients with Congenital Zika Syndrome and microcephaly.</p

Urodynamic studies found on CZS patients.

<p>Urodynamic studies showing three different scenarios of overactive bladder found on CZS patients, all with high-risk urodynamic indicators known to cause progressive urinary system damage. A (case 1): Bladder behavior is normal at the beginning but a series of uninhibited detrusor contractions raises the bladder pressure during 2/3 of the filing phase. B (case 2): A very high and sustained inhibited detrusor contraction and a concomitant increased sphincter activity (detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia) raises the intravesical pressure up to 100 cm H₂0. The leak point pressure is equally dangerously high (110 cm H₂0). C (case 3): The repeated inhibited detrusor contractions starting at the very beginning of the filing phase, always followed by leak, severely reduces the bladder capacity.</p