Interaction of interleukin-7 and interleukin-3 with the CXCL12-induced proliferation of B-cell progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Background and Objectives The chemokine stroma-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α or CXCL12) is essential for proliferation of B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells in their physiological microenvironment, bone marrow stroma. CXCL12 synergizes with cytokines that stimulate myeloid cells, but its interaction with cytokines affecting lymphoid cells has not been examined. We investigated whether interleukin (IL)-7 and IL-3 interact with CXCL12 to regulate ALL proliferation.Design and Methods The survival of ALL cells in serum-free cultures, with or without stromal support and cytokines, was assessed by flow cytometry, and proliferation by 3H-thymidine incorporation. Signaling mechanisms were assessed by western blotting of phosphorylated forms of signaling molecules and by the use of specific inhibitors.Results CXCL12, IL-3, and IL-7 had only marginal effects on ALL cell survival under serum-free conditions. However, these molecules individually induced significant proliferative responses in stromal cultures of 11 cases of ALL. The combination of CXCL12 with IL-7 or IL-3 produced a variety of responses, with clear synergistic or additive interactions observed in four cases. Synergistic proliferation in response to CXCL12 plus IL-7 was associated with enhanced phosphorylation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases, ERK-1/2 and p38, and AKT, and was partially inhibited by pretreatment of cells with inhibitors for p38 MAPK and phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase, implicating these pathways in the proliferation in response to IL-7 plus CXCL12.Interpretation and Conclusions These findings indicate a complex interaction between signaling from the CXCR4 receptor on ALL cells with those initiated by the cytokines IL-7 and IL-3, suggesting that CXCL12 may facilitate ALL proliferation by enhancing cytokine-signaling pathways in responsive cases

Mucosal Eosinophil Abundance in Non-Inflamed Colonic Tissue Is Associated with Response to Vedolizumab Induction Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Vedolizumab is used as a treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but induction therapy leads to clinical response and remission in approximately 55% and 30% of patients with IBD, respectively. In this study, we aimed to explore the predictive value of mucosal eosinophils and serum eotaxin-1 regarding response to vedolizumab induction therapy. Eighty-four (84) patients with IBD (37 Crohn’s disease [CD], 47 ulcerative colitis [UC]) were included. For 24 patients with IBD, histopathology was assessed for eosinophil counts in non-inflamed colonic tissue prior to vedolizumab treatment. For 64 patients with IBD, serum eotaxin-1 levels were quantified prior to (baseline) and during vedolizumab treatment. Serum samples of 100 patients with IBD (34 CD, 66 UC) from the GEMINI 1 and 2 trials were used for external validation. Baseline mucosal eosinophil numbers in non-inflamed colonic tissue were significantly higher in responders to vedolizumab induction therapy when compared to primary non-responders (69 [34–138] vs. 24 [18–28] eosinophils/high-power field, respectively, p < 0.01). Baseline serum eotaxin-1 levels in the discovery cohort were significantly elevated in responders, compared to primary non-responders (0.33 [0.23–0.44] vs. 0.20 [0.16–0.29] ng/mL, p < 0.01). Prediction models based on mucosal eosinophil counts and serum eotaxin-1 showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 and 0.79, respectively. However, the predictive capacity of baseline serum eotaxin-1 levels could not be validated in the GEMINI cohort. Mucosal eosinophil abundance in non-inflamed colonic tissue was associated with response to vedolizumab induction therapy in patients with IBD. Future studies are warranted to further validate the potential value of mucosal eosinophils and serum eotaxin-1 as biomarkers for response to vedolizumab therapy

Mucosal eosinophil abundance in non-inflamed colonic tissue predicts response to vedolizumab induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Vedolizumab is used as a treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but induction therapy leads to clinical response and remission in approximately 55% and 30% of patients with IBD, respectively. In this study, we aimed to explore the predictive value of mucosal eosinophils and serum eotaxin-1 regarding response to vedolizumab induction therapy. Eighty-four (84) patients with IBD (37 Crohn’s disease [CD], 47 ulcerative colitis [UC]) were included. For 24 patients with IBD, histopathology was assessed for eosinophil counts in non-inflamed colonic tissue prior to vedolizumab treatment. For 64 patients with IBD, serum eotaxin-1 levels were quantified prior to (baseline) and during vedolizumab treatment. Serum samples of 100 patients with IBD (34 CD, 66 UC) from the GEMINI 1 and 2 trials were used for external validation. Baseline mucosal eosinophil numbers in non-inflamed colonic tissue were significantly higher in responders to vedolizumab induction therapy when compared to primary non-responders (69 [34–138] vs. 24 [18–28] eosinophils/high-power field, respectively, p < 0.01). Baseline serum eotaxin-1 levels in the discovery cohort were significantly elevated in responders, compared to primary non-responders (0.33 [0.23–0.44] vs. 0.20 [0.16–0.29] ng/mL, p < 0.01). Prediction models based on mucosal eosinophil counts and serum eotaxin-1 showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 and 0.79, respectively. However, the predictive capacity of baseline serum eotaxin-1 levels could not be validated in the GEMINI cohort. Mucosal eosinophil abundance in non-inflamed colonic tissue was associated with response to vedolizumab induction therapy in patients with IBD. Future studies are warranted to further validate the potential value of mucosal eosinophils and serum eotaxin-1 as biomarkers for response to vedolizumab therapy

Research potential and limitations of trace analyses of cremated remains

Human cremation is a common funeral practice all over the world and willpresumably become an even more popular choice for interment in thefuture. Mainly for purposes of identification, there is presently agrowing need to perform trace analyses such as DNA or stable isotopeanalyses on human remains after cremation in order to clarify pendingquestions in civil or criminal court cases. The aim of this study was toexperimentally test the potential and limitations of DNA and stableisotope analyses when conducted on cremated remains.For this purpose, tibiae from modern cattle were experimentally crematedby incinerating the bones in increments of 100 degrees C until a maximumof 1000 degrees C was reached. In addition, cremated human remains werecollected from a modern crematory. The samples were investigated todetermine level of DNA preservation and stable isotope values (C and Nin collagen, C and O in the structural carbonate, and Sr in apatite).Furthermore, we assessed the integrity of microstructural organization,appearance under UV-light, collagen content, as well as the mineral andcrystalline organization. This was conducted in order to provide ageneral background with which to explain observed changes in the traceanalyses data sets. The goal is to develop an efficacious screeningmethod for determining at which degree of burning bone still retains itsoriginal biological signals. We found that stable isotope analysis ofthe tested light elements in bone is only possible up to a heat exposureof 300 degrees C while the isotopic signal from strontium remainsunaltered even in bones exposed to very high temperatures. DNA-analysesseem theoretically possible up to a heat exposure of 600 degrees C butcan not be advised in every case because of the increased risk ofcontamination. While the macroscopic colour and UV-fluorescence ofcremated bone give hints to temperature exposure of the bone’s outersurface, its histological appearance can be used as a reliable indicatorfor the assessment of the overall degree of burning

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection

Mucosal Eosinophil Abundance in Non-Inflamed Colonic Tissue Is Associated with Response to Vedolizumab Induction Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Vedolizumab is used as a treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but induction therapy leads to clinical response and remission in approximately 55% and 30% of patients with IBD, respectively. In this study, we aimed to explore the predictive value of mucosal eosinophils and serum eotaxin-1 regarding response to vedolizumab induction therapy. Eighty-four (84) patients with IBD (37 Crohn’s disease [CD], 47 ulcerative colitis [UC]) were included. For 24 patients with IBD, histopathology was assessed for eosinophil counts in non-inflamed colonic tissue prior to vedolizumab treatment. For 64 patients with IBD, serum eotaxin-1 levels were quantified prior to (baseline) and during vedolizumab treatment. Serum samples of 100 patients with IBD (34 CD, 66 UC) from the GEMINI 1 and 2 trials were used for external validation. Baseline mucosal eosinophil numbers in non-inflamed colonic tissue were significantly higher in responders to vedolizumab induction therapy when compared to primary non-responders (69 [34–138] vs. 24 [18–28] eosinophils/high-power field, respectively, p < 0.01). Baseline serum eotaxin-1 levels in the discovery cohort were significantly elevated in responders, compared to primary non-responders (0.33 [0.23–0.44] vs. 0.20 [0.16–0.29] ng/mL, p < 0.01). Prediction models based on mucosal eosinophil counts and serum eotaxin-1 showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 and 0.79, respectively. However, the predictive capacity of baseline serum eotaxin-1 levels could not be validated in the GEMINI cohort. Mucosal eosinophil abundance in non-inflamed colonic tissue was associated with response to vedolizumab induction therapy in patients with IBD. Future studies are warranted to further validate the potential value of mucosal eosinophils and serum eotaxin-1 as biomarkers for response to vedolizumab therapy