7 research outputs found

    Acoustic rhinometric evaluation of the nasal cavity after rapid maxillary expansion

    Get PDF
    Objective: Because of the anatomic proximity between the nasal cavity and the maxilla, much has been investigated regarding changesin nasal geometry after this procedure. In this study, we propose to evaluate the repercussion of RME in the nasal cavity in the patientduring the growth phase. Materials and methods: For this, we evaluated 19 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency and indication for RME. The patientswere evaluated using acoustic rhinometry in 3 moments (pre-RME, post-RME, post-restraint). Results: There was no mean change in MCA1 M1, M2 and M3 (p = 0.122). MCA2 measurement appears to increase in M2. VOL1 is suffering a mean increase in M2 compared to M1 (p = 0.025) and continues higher in M3 (p = 0.271). There is little variationof VOL 2 between the evaluated moments. Conclusion: The results allow us to affirm that RME significantly increases the anterior region of the nasal cavity immediately to theprocedure, however, after the period of containment there is a tendency of recurrence of this increase returning to values close to theinitial cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity

    Hausdorff Distance evaluation of orthodontic accessories' streaking artifacts in 3D model superimposition

    Get PDF
    The aim of this study was to determine whether image artifacts caused by orthodontic metal accessories interfere with the accuracy of 3D CBCT model superimposition. A human dry skull was subjected three times to a CBCT scan: at first without orthodontic brackets (T1), then with stainless steel brackets bonded without (T2) and with orthodontic arch wires (T3) inserted into the brackets' slots. The registration of image surfaces and the superimposition of 3D models were performed. Within-subject surface distances between T1-T2, T1-T3 and T2-T3 were computed and calculated for comparison among the three data sets. The minimum and maximum Hausdorff Distance units (HDu) computed between the corresponding data points of the T1 and T2 CBCT 3D surface images were 0.000000 and 0.049280 HDu, respectively, and the mean distance was 0.002497 HDu. The minimum and maximum Hausdorff Distances between T1 and T3 were 0.000000 and 0.047440 HDu, respectively, with a mean distance of 0.002585 HDu. In the comparison between T2 and T3, the minimum, maximum and mean Hausdorff Distances were 0.000000, 0.025616 and 0.000347 HDu, respectively. In the current study, the image artifacts caused by metal orthodontic accessories did not compromise the accuracy of the 3D model superimposition. Color-coded maps of overlaid structures complemented the computed Hausdorff Distances and demonstrated a precise fusion between the data sets

    TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors

    Full text link

    TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors

    Get PDF
    Objective: In order to understand the conflicting information on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathophysiologic responses after mandibular advancement surgery, an overview of the literature was proposed with a focus on certain risk factors. Methods: A literature search was carried out in the Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases in the period from January 1980 through March 2013. Various combinations of keywords related to TMJ changes [disc displacement, arthralgia, condylar resorption (CR)] and aspects of surgical intervention (fixation technique, amount of advancement) were used. A hand search of these papers was also carried out to identify additional articles. Results: A total of 148 articles were considered for this overview and, although methodological troubles were common, this review identified relevant findings which the practitioner can take into consideration during treatment planning: 1- Surgery was unable to influence TMJ with preexisting displaced disc and crepitus; 2- Clicking and arthralgia were not predictable after surgery, although there was greater likelihood of improvement rather than deterioration; 3- The amount of mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation, and the rigidity of the fixation technique seemed to influence TMJ position and health; 4- The risk of CR increased, especially in identified high-risk cases. Conclusions: Young adult females with mandibular retrognathism and increased mandibular plane angle are susceptible to painful TMJ, and are subject to less improvement after surgery and prone to CR. Furthermore, thorough evidenced-based studies are required to understand the response of the TMJ after mandibular advancement surgery

    Orthodontic movement of teeth with short root anomaly: should it be avoided, faced or ignored?

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: Short Root Anomaly (SRA) is an uncommon disease and a challenge for orthodontic treatment as it tends to increase the risk of root resorption. OBJECTIVE: Assess the current status of the diagnosis, etiology and orthodontic management of teeth with SRA, and present case reports. METHOD: A literature review was carried out in PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: A differential diagnosis of SRA should be conducted for teeth with incomplete root formation, external apical root resorption, dentin dysplasia type I and post dental trauma root hypoplasia. SRA is genetically determined and orthodontic movement requires changes in clinical and radiographic management in order to restrict damage. CONCLUSION: Orthodontic movement of teeth with SRA is contraindicated in extreme cases, only. Caution at all stages could minimize attachment loss and lead to long-term stability
    corecore