Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to Source Orientation

An important difference between magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) is that MEG is insensitive to radially oriented sources. We quantified computationally the dependency of MEG and EEG on the source orientation using a forward model with realistic tissue boundaries. Similar to the simpler case of a spherical head model, in which MEG cannot see radial sources at all, for most cortical locations there was a source orientation to which MEG was insensitive. The median value for the ratio of the signal magnitude for the source orientation of the lowest and the highest sensitivity was 0.06 for MEG and 0.63 for EEG. The difference in the sensitivity to the source orientation is expected to contribute to systematic differences in the signal-to-noise ratio between MEG and EEG.National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant NS057500)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant NS037462)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant HD040712)National Center for Research Resources (U.S.) (P41RR14075)Mind Research Networ

Evaluation of smoothing in an iterative lp-norm minimization algorithm for surface-based source localization of MEG

The imaging of neural sources of magnetoencephalographic data based on distributed source models requires additional constraints on the source distribution in order to overcome ill-posedness and obtain a plausible solution. The minimum l(p) norm (0 < p < or = 1) constraint is known to be appropriate for reconstructing focal sources distributed in several regions. A well-known recursive method for solving the l(p)-norm minimization problem, for example, is the focal underdetermined system solver (FOCUSS). However, this iterative algorithm tends to give spurious sources when the noise level is high. In this study, we present an algorithm to incorporate a smoothing technique into the FOCUSS algorithm and test different smoothing kernels in a surface-based cortical source space. Simulations with cortical source patches assumed in auditory areas show that the incorporation of the smoothing procedure improves the performance of the FOCUSS algorithm, and that using the geodesic distance for constructing a smoothing kernel is a better choice than using the Euclidean one, particularly when employing a cortical source space. We also apply these methods to a real data set obtained from an auditory experiment and illustrate their applicability to realistic data by presenting the reconstructed source images localized in the superior temporal gyrus