Challenges of early renal cancer detection: symptom patterns and incidental diagnosis rate in a multicentre prospective UK cohort of patients presenting with suspected renal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency and nature of symptoms in patients presenting with suspected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and examine their reliability in achieving early diagnosis. DESIGN: Multicentre prospective observational cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven UK centres recruiting patients presenting with suspected newly diagnosed RCC. Symptoms reported by patients were recorded and reviewed. Comprehensive clinico-pathological and outcome data were also collected. OUTCOMES: Type and frequency of reported symptoms, incidental diagnosis rate, metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Of 706 patients recruited between 2011 and 2014, 608 patients with a confirmed RCC formed the primary study population. The majority (60%) of patients were diagnosed incidentally. 87% of patients with stage Ia and 36% with stage III or IV disease presented incidentally. Visible haematuria was reported in 23% of patients and was commonly associated with advanced disease (49% had stage III or IV disease). Symptomatic presentation was associated with poorer outcomes, likely reflecting the presence of higher stage disease. Symptom patterns among the 54 patients subsequently found to have a benign renal mass were similar to those with a confirmed RCC. CONCLUSIONS: Raising public awareness of RCC-related symptoms as a strategy to improve early detection rates is limited by the fact that related symptoms are relatively uncommon and often associated with advanced disease. Greater attention must be paid to the feasibility of screening strategies and the identification of circulating diagnostic biomarkers

Challenges of early renal cancer detection: symptom patterns and incidental diagnosis rate in a multicentre prospective UK cohort of patients presenting with suspected renal cancer

Objectives: To describe the frequency and nature of symptoms in patients presenting with suspected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and examine their reliability in achieving early diagnosis. Design: Multicentre prospective observational cohort study. Setting and participants: Eleven UK centres recruiting patients presenting with suspected newly diagnosed RCC. Symptoms reported by patients were recorded and reviewed. Comprehensive clinico-pathological and outcome data were also collected. Outcomes: Type and frequency of reported symptoms, incidental diagnosis rate, metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival. Results: Of 706 patients recruited between 2011 and 2014, 608 patients with a confirmed RCC formed the primary study population. The majority (60%) of patients were diagnosed incidentally. 87% of patients with stage Ia and 36% with stage III or IV disease presented incidentally. Visible haematuria was reported in 23% of patients and was commonly associated with advanced disease (49% had stage III or IV disease). Symptomatic presentation was associated with poorer outcomes, likely reflecting the presence of higher stage disease. Symptom patterns among the 54 patients subsequently found to have a benign renal mass were similar to those with a confirmed RCC. Conclusions: Raising public awareness of RCC-related symptoms as a strategy to improve early detection rates is limited by the fact that related symptoms are relatively uncommon and often associated with advanced disease. Greater attention must be paid to the feasibility of screening strategies and the identification of circulating diagnostic biomarkers

Diagnosis, treatment, and survival from kidney cancer: real‐world National Health Service England data between 2013 and 2019

Objectives: To report the NHS Digital (NHSD) data for patients diagnosed with kidney cancer (KC) in England. We explore the incidence, route to diagnosis (RTD), treatment, and survival patterns from 2013 to 2019. Materials and Methods: Data was extracted from the Cancer Data NHSD portal for International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition coded KC; this included Cancer Registry data, Hospital Episode Statistics, and cancer waiting times data. Results: Registrations included 66 696 individuals with KC. Incidence of new KC diagnoses increased (8998 in 2013, to 10 232 in 2019), but the age‐standardised rates were stable (18.7–19.4/100 000 population). Almost half of patients (30 340 [45.5%]) were aged 0–70 years and the cohort were most frequently diagnosed with Stage 1–2 KC (n = 26 297 [39.4%]). Most patients were diagnosed through non‐urgent general practitioner referrals (n = 16 814 [30.4%]), followed by 2‐week‐wait (n = 15 472 [28.0%]) and emergency routes (n = 11 796 [21.3%]), with older patients (aged ≥70 years), Stage 4 KCs, and patients with non‐specified renal cell carcinoma being significantly more likely to present through the emergency route (all P < 0.001). Invasive treatment (surgery or ablation), radiotherapy, or systemic anti‐cancer therapy use varied with disease stage, patient factors, and treatment network (Cancer Alliance). Survival outcomes differed by Stage, histological subtype, and social deprivation class (P < 0.001). Age‐standardised mortality rates did not change over the study duration, although immunotherapy usage is likely not captured in this study timeline. Conclusion: The NHSD resource provides useful insight about the incidence, diagnostic pathways, treatment, and survival of patients with KC in England and a useful benchmark for the upcoming commissioned National Kidney Cancer Audit. The RTD data may be limited by incidental diagnoses, which could confound the high proportion of ‘emergency’ diagnoses. Importantly, survival outcomes remained relatively unchanged

Short‐term psychosocial outcomes of adding a non‐contrast abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan to the thoracic CT within lung cancer screening

Objectives To evaluate psychological, social, and financial outcomes amongst individuals undergoing a non-contrast abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan to screen for kidney cancer and other abdominal malignancies alongside the thoracic CT within lung cancer screening. Subjects and Methods The Yorkshire Kidney Screening Trial (YKST) is a feasibility study of adding a non-contrast abdominal CT scan to the thoracic CT within lung cancer screening. A total of 500 participants within the YKST, comprising all who had an abnormal CT scan and a random sample of one-third of those with a normal scan between 14/03/2022 and 24/08/2022 were sent a questionnaire at 3 and 6 months. Outcomes included the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ), the short-form of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the EuroQoL five Dimensions five Levels scale (EQ-5D-5L). Data were analysed using regression adjusting for participant age, sex, socioeconomic status, education, baseline quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and ethnicity. Results A total of 380 (76%) participants returned questionnaires at 3 months and 328 (66%) at 6 months. There was no difference in any outcomes between participants with a normal scan and those with abnormal scans requiring no further action. Individuals requiring initial further investigations or referral had higher scores on the negative PCQ than those with normal scans at 3 months (standardised mean difference 0.28 sd, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.54; P = 0.044). The difference was greater in those with anxiety or depression at baseline. No differences were seen at 6 months. Conclusion Screening for kidney cancer and other abdominal malignancies using abdominal CT alongside the thoracic CT within lung cancer screening is unlikely to cause significant lasting psychosocial or financial harm to participants with incidental findings

Cost-effectiveness of one-off upper abdominal CT screening as an add-on to lung cancer screening in England

Background: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer is available for high-risk individuals in England. Screening simultaneously for upper abdominal conditions, including cancer, is feasible. Here, we estimate the cost-effectiveness of one-off upper abdominal CT screening, added onto lung cancer screening, based on the Yorkshire Kidney Screening Trial (YKST) feasibility study. Methods: A multi-disease health economic model was developed. Ten cancers and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were modelled over a lifetime horizon. YKST data informed disease prevalence, resource use and screening costs. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness were estimated probabilistically. Results: Screening per person costs £70.89, produces 0.0059 QALYs, and has 96% probability of being cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £12,085. AAA contributes most to cost-effectiveness, followed by kidney cancer, but some cancer findings reduce cost-effectiveness. Screening is more cost-effective at younger ages. Screen-detectable disease prevalence, severity and mortality risk contribute most to uncertainty. Conclusions: One-off upper abdominal CT screening is potentially cost-effective, but costs, harms and benefits vary between conditions. Cost-effectiveness is driven by early diagnosis of AAA, then kidney cancer, illustrating the importance of considering all relevant diseases in screening models. A larger trial would provide more robust data to refine the cost-effectiveness argument. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0500519