15 research outputs found
The job network and underemployment
The paper notes how long-term unemployment has been replaced with long-term underemployment and examines the role of the Job Network in this new environment. The paper discusses how the structure of unemployment has changed, how the Job Network has evolved and comments on its performance. It is noted that the Job Network has become more and more driven by tightly specified processes and services supported by an ever tighter compliance regime. This business model has much in common with franchising and this analogy is used to interpret the observed outcomes and the concerns expressed by providers and other interested parties. The paper concludes that there are some inherent problems with the franchising model and suggests that less prescriptive arrangements may be preferable
The ACNC, the Senate, the Commission of Audit and the Not-for-Profit Sector
Law reform initiatives may take decades to come to fruition. According to
Kingdon, a convergence of problems, policies and political streams is needed to
open a window of opportunity to initiate major changes to existing laws.
Policymaking may, in fact, be characterised by long periods of stability followed by brief periods of major policy shifts that may result in key reforms to existing legal systems. As such, it is not surprising that the not-for-profit sector’s reforms have taken decades and countless inquiries to come into effect. These reforms have resulted in the introduction of a new regulatory framework for the sector through the establishment, in 2012, of the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission (‘ACNC’)
Unemployed citizen or ‘at risk’ client? Classification systems and employment services in Denmark and Australia
The paper explores recent developments in Australian and Danish unemployment policies with a special focus on the technologies used to classify and categorize unemployed people on government benefits. Using governmentality as our theoretical framework, we consider the implications of reducing complex social problems to statistical scores and differentiated categories – forms of knowledge that diminish the capacity to think about unemployment as a collective problem requiring collective solutions. What we argue is that classification systems, which are part and parcel of welfare state administration, are becoming more technocratic in the way in which they divide the population into different categories of risk. © The Author(s), 2010