A 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative reduces DNA damage and stimulates DNA repair in human cells in vitro

Abstract Compounds of the 1,4-dihydropyridine (1,4-DHP) series have been shown to reduce spontaneous, alkylation-and radiationinduced mutation rates in animal test systems. Here we report studies using AV-153, the 1,4-DHP derivative that showed the highest antimutagenic activity in those tests, to examine if it modulates DNA repair in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and in two human lymphoblastoid cell lines, Raji and HL-60. AV-153 caused a 50% inhibition of growth (IC 50 ) of Raji and HL-60 cells at 14.9 ± 1.2 and 10.3 ± 0.8 mM, respectively, but did not show a cytotoxic effect at concentrations <100 M. Alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assays showed that AV-153 reduced the number of DNA strand breaks in untreated cells and also in cells exposed to 2 Gy of gamma-radiation, 100 M ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS), or 100 M H 2 O 2 . DNA damage was reduced by up to 87% at AV-153 concentrations between 1 and 10 nM, and a positive dose-effect relationship was seen between 0.01 and 1 nM. Comparison of the kinetics of DNA strand-break rejoining in the presence and absence of AV-153 revealed a considerable influence on the rate of repair. In view of the resemblance of this compound's structure to that of dihydronicotinamide, a substrate for poly(ADP-rybose)polymerase, the modulation of DNA repair by AV-153 could involve an influence on poly(ADP)ribosylation

Дія свинцю (П) в сублетальній концентрації на вміст білкових і кислоторозчинних тіолів та білку в печінці полівки сірої

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) have become crucial in medicine and biology. Several studies indicate their phenotypic similarities with cancer stem cells (CSCs) and a propensity to form tumors. Thus it is desirable to identify a trait which differentiates iPS populations and CSCs. Searching for such a feature, in this work we compare the restriction (R) point-governed regulation of cell cycle progression in different cell types (iPS, cancer, CSC and normal cells) based on the expression profile of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase3 (PFKFB3) and phosphofructokinase (PFK1). Our study reveals that PFKFB3 and PFK1 expression allows discrimination between iPS and CSCs. Moreover, cancer and iPS cells, when cultured under hypoxic conditions, alter their expression level of PFKFB3 and PFK1 to resemble those in CSCs. We also observed cell type-related differences in response to inhibition of PFKFB3. This possibility to distinguish CSC from iPS cells or non-stem cancer cells by PFKB3 and PFK1 expression improves the outlook for clinical application of stem cell-based therapies and for more precise detection of CSCs

Expression of miRNA-Targeted and Not-Targeted Reporter Genes Shows Mutual Influence and Intercellular Specificity

The regulation of translation by RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs) composed of Argonaute proteins and micro-RNAs is well established; however, the mechanisms underlying specific cellular responses to miRNAs and how specific complexes arise are not completely clear. To explore these questions, we performed experiments with Renilla and firefly luciferase reporter genes transfected in a psiCHECK-2 plasmid into human HCT116 or Me45 cells, where only the Renilla gene contained sequences targeted by microRNAs (miRNAs) in the 3′UTR. The effects of targeting were miRNA-specific; miRNA-21-5p caused strong inhibition of translation, whereas miRNA-24-3p or Let-7 family caused no change or an increase in reporter Renilla luciferase synthesis. The mRNA-protein complexes formed by transcripts regulated by different miRNAs differed from each other and were different in different cell types, as shown by sucrose gradient centrifugation. Unexpectedly, the presence of miRNA targets on Renilla transcripts also affected the expression of the co-transfected but non-targeted firefly luciferase gene in both cell types. Renilla and firefly transcripts were found in the same sucrose gradient fractions and specific anti-miRNA oligoribonucleotides, which influenced the expression of the Renilla gene, and also influenced that of firefly gene. These results suggest that, in addition to targeted transcripts, miRNAs may also modulate the expression of non-targeted transcripts, and using the latter to normalize the results may cause bias. We discuss some hypothetical mechanisms which could explain the observed miRNA-induced effects