6 research outputs found

    Application of Polyvinyl Acetate as Release Controlling Agent in 17Îē-Estradiol Implant Matrices

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjective: To apply two different, low (113K) and high (500K), molecular weights polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) as the release controlling agent in 2% 17Îē-estradiol (E2) implant matrix system. Method: Two plasticizers, triethyl citrate (TEC, a water-soluble plasticizer or diethyl phthalate (DEP, a waterinsoluble plasticizer) were incorporated to alter the flexibility of the matrix. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP K30) was used as the releasing modifier. Solid dispersion of E2 in polymer was prepared by solvent evaporation method and compressed in a mold to have an implant matrix of 2 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length. Results: The unplasticized PVAc of different molecular weights did not provide difference in E2 release rate in phosphate buffer pH 7.4, about 14% of E2 was gradually released from the matrices during 28 days. Implants using plasticized PVAc of different molecular weights gave different drug release rates. E2 released from implants increased with increasing weight percent of plasticizers and adding PVP K30 promoted more drug release. Release kinetic of the PVAc implant matrix was best described by Higuchi model which indicated drug release by diffusion process. Conclusion: PVAc could be applied in 17Îē-estradiol matrix implant for long term drug delivery.Keywords: 17Îē-estradiol, implant, polyvinylacetate, triethyl citrate, diethyl phthalate, polyvinylpyrrolidone āļšāļ—āļ„āļąāļ”āļĒāđˆāļ­āļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ„āđŒ: āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļ§āđˆāļē polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) āļ—āļąāļ‡āđ‰ āļŠāļ™āļīāļ”āļ™āđ‰āļģāļŦāļ™āļąāļāđ‚āļĄāđ€āļĨāļāļļāļĨāļ•āđˆāļģ (113k) āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļđāļ‡ (500k) āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ release controlling agent āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšimplant matrix system āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ 2% 17Îē-estradiol (E2) āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē: āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļŠāļēāļĢplasticizer āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļ™āļīāļ”āļ„āļ·āļ­ triethyl citrate (TEC) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĨāļ°āļĨāļēāļĒāļ™āđ‰āļģ āđāļĨāļ° diethylphthalate (DEP) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĨāļ°āļĨāļēāļĒāļ™āđ‰āļģ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āļ„āđˆāļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĒāļ·āļ”āļŦāļĒāļļāđˆāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĄāļ—āļĢāļīāļāļ‹āđŒ āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļŠāļēāļĢpolyvinylpyrrolidine āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ releasing modifier āđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩ solvent evaporation āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ•āļĢāļĩāļĒāļĄ solid dispersion āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ E2 āđƒāļ™āđ‚āļžāļĨāļīāđ€āļĄāļ­āļĢāđŒ āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ­āļąāļ”āđƒāļ™āđāļĄāđˆāļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ„āļ”āđ‰ implantmatrix āļ‚āļ™āļēāļ”āđ€āļŠāđ‰āļ™āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļĻāļđāļ™āļĒāđŒāļāļĨāļēāļ‡ 2 āļĄāļĄ. āđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļēāļ§ 10 āļĄāļĄ. āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē: āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēPVAc āļ—āļąāļ‡āđ‰ āļŠāļ™āļīāļ”āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ™āđ‰āļģāļŦāļ™āļąāļāđ‚āļĄāđ€āļĨāļāļļāļĨāļŠāļđāļ‡āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ•āđˆāļģ āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ„āļĄāđˆāļœāļŠāļĄ plasticizer āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļąāļ•āļĢāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĨāļ”āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒ E2 āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™ āđƒāļ™ phosphate buffer pH 7.4 āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ›āļĨāļ”āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒ 14%āđƒāļ™āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡ 28 āļ§āļąāļ™ āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™ PVAc āļ—āļĩāđˆāļœāļŠāļĄ plasticizer āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļąāļ•āļĢāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĨāļ”āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒ E2 āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĨāļ”āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒ E2 āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļąāļ”āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™ plasticizer āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ•āļīāļĄ PVPK30 āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēāļ­āļąāļ•āļĢāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĨāļ”āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļˆāļĨāļ™āļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĨāļ”āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒ E2āļˆāļēāļ implant matrix āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩ PVAc āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ release controlling agent āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒ Higuchi model āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĨāļ”āļ›āļĨāđˆāļ­āļĒāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđāļžāļĢāđˆ āļŠāļĢāļļāļ›:āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļŠāđ‰ PVAc āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ™āļģāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļĒāļēāđāļšāļšāđ€āļ™āļīāđˆāļ™āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļš matrix implant āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĒāļē 17Îē-estradiolāļ„āļģāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļ: 17Îē-estradiol, implant, polyvinylacetate, triethyl citrate, diethylphthalate, polyvinylpyrrolidon

    The influence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic additives on the formation and drug release from pellets prepared by extrusion/spheronization

    Get PDF
    The preparation of pharmaceutical pellets by the process of extrusion and spheronization usually relies on microcrystalline cellulose as a basic ingredient. The addition of other additives could influence the performance of the formulation of pellets, especially if an attempt is made to control the drug release from the pellets. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic additives on the ability to prepare spherical pellets by this process and on the characterization of in vitro drug release from the pellets produced. The study was carried out with the use of a ram extruder and a conventional spheronizer. The ability to form spherical pellets and the optimum quantity of binder liquid required were assessed by characterization of the extrusion force and the final product, in terms of size, size distribution, shape, density and porosity. An investigation of the extrudate diameter and the surface roughness of the extrudate and pellets was included for certain formulations. The influence of the additive on the in vitro drug release from pellets was assessed by the application of the statistical moment analysis. Spherical pellets containing paracetamol could be prepared by the addition of a wide range of potential drug release-controlling additives including the hydrophilic additives: 1-16% chitosan and/or 1-16% sodium alginate, 3% methylcellulose, 3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and 30% pregelatinized starch, and the hydrophobic additives: 30% methylcellulose, 15% solid of the aqueous dispersions of methylcellulose and acrylate co-polymers, 30-60% glyceryl monostearate, 30% cetyl alcohol and 30% carnauba wax. Pellets containing diclofenac sodium, ibuprofen, and indomethacin were also successfully formed with glyceryl monostearate at levels of 30-60%. For diclofenac sodium, glyceryl monostearate could fully replace microcrystalline cellulose in the formulation. Different glyceride-based waxes were also shown to form satisfactorily spherical pellets containing diclofenac sodium at a level of 30%. The presence of the additives in the formulations of pellets did influence the characteristics of the product and the in vitro drug release. It was not, however, possible to ensure sufficient retardation of drug release to provide a controlled release matrix pellet. This appeared to be in some way related to the fact that some additives caused the pellets to disintegrate when added to fluid. Identification of the mechanism of the control of drug release also provided an insight into the way the additives influenced the formulation

    An optimized force field for crystalline phases of resorcinol.

    No full text
    noThe two known crystalline phases of resorcinol and their phase transitions are of considerable interest. The crystals exhibit pyro- and piezo-electricity and, remarkably, the higher temperature phase is the denser phase. Furthermore, crystals of the phase, by virtue of having a polar axis, have played a crucial role in investigating fundamental issues of crystal growth. We report an optimized force field for the molecular simulation of crystalline phases of resorcinol. The hydroxyl groups of the resorcinol molecule have a torsional degree of freedom and the molecule adopts a different conformation in each of the two phases of resorcinol. The torsional barrier, therefore, was considered to be critical and has been characterized using ab initio methods. Although the atomic partial charges showed some dependence on the molecular conformation, a single set of partial charges was found to be sufficient in describing the electrostatic potential for all conformations. The parameters for the van der Waals interactions were optimized using sensitivity analysis. The proposed force field reproduces not only the static structures but also the stability of the crystalline phases in extended molecular dynamics simulations

    The Molecular Mechanism of Îą-Resorcinol's Asymmetric Crystal Growth from the Melt

    No full text
    Polar crystals are characterized by an axis that has a nonzero dipole due to the nature of the molecular packing. For these crystals, the growth rates of the faces delineating the polar axis are generally expected to be equal. Recent experiments, however, have revealed a few exceptions where the growth of these faces from the vapor phase is asymmetric, a notable case being crystals of resorcinol. Here, we present the mechanics of resorcinol crystal growth from the melt for the hemihedral faces (011) and (01Ė…1Ė…) delineating the polar axis as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations reveal asymmetric growth consistent with experiment. The asymmetry is attributed to the slow-growing (011) face being less able to direct the correct alignment of the oncoming molecules and the presence of an alternate resorcinol conformation that readily incorporates into the lattice at this surface, serving to poison and retard subsequent growth. Putting the issue of the rogue conformation aside, the identified factors that influence molecular recognition are considered to be applicable to other polar crystals, which suggest asymmetric growth along the polar axis to be a common feature
    corecore