Switch to ocrelizumab in MS patients treated with natalizumab in extended interval dosing at high risk of PML: A 96-week follow-up pilot study

We aimed to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of ocrelizumab in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) at high risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), previously treated with natalizumab in extending interval dosing (EID), who switched to ocrelizumab and to compare them with patients who continued EID-natalizumab. Thirty MS patients previously treated with natalizumab in EID (every 8 weeks) were included in this observational retrospective cohort study. Among them, 17 patients were switched to ocrelizumab and 13 continued with EID-natalizumab. Except for the John Cunningham virus (JCV) index, no significant differences were detected between both groups. Main outcome measures included: annualized relapse rate (ARR), radiological activity, disability progression, and the NEDA-3 index. Patients were followed for 96 weeks. The median washout period in ocrelizumab-switchers was 6 weeks. Among them, AAR and radiological activity during follow-up were 0.03, without significant differences in comparison with the previous period on natalizumab-EID. The comparison between ocrelizumab-switchers and patients continuing on EID-natalizumab showed no significant differences in AAR, radiological activity, or disability progression. However, the proportion of patients maintaining a NEDA-3 status in week 96 was slightly superior among ocrelizumab-switchers (94 vs 69%). No serious adverse events were observed in any group. In conclusion, switching from EID-natalizumab to ocrelizumab can be considered as a therapeutic option, particularly in patients with MS at high risk of PML, to mitigate the risks of both PML and disease reactivationFunding: This study received funding from IDIVAL (CSI 19/51 and CSI21/73). The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publicatio

Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on ischemic stroke admissions and in-hospital mortality in North-West Spain

Background and purpose Spain has been one of the countries heavily stricken by COVID-19. But this epidemic has not affected all regions equally. We analyzed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital stroke admissions and in-hospital mortality in tertiary referral hospitals from North-West Spain.Methods Spanish multicenter retrospective observational study based on data from tertiary hospitals of the NORDICTUS network. We recorded the number of patients admitted for ischemic stroke between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020, the number of IVT and EVT procedures, and in-hospital mortality.Results In the study period, 2737 patients were admitted with ischemic stroke. There was a decrease in the weekly mean admitted patients during the pandemic (124 vs. 173, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality of stroke patients increased significantly (9.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.003), but there were no differences in the proportion of IVT (17.3% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.405) or EVT (22% vs. 23%, p = 0.504).Conclusion We found a decrease in the number of ischemic stroke admissions and an increase in in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in this large study from North-West Spain. There were regional changes within the network, not fully explained by the severity of the pandemic in different regions.Peer reviewe

Impact of COVID‐19 outbreak in reperfusion therapies of acute ischemic stroke in North‐West Spain

Since the first reported case in early December 2019, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection, known as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19), has spread all over the world (1‐3). As of June 4th, more than 6 million cases and 350,000 deaths have been reported worldwide (4). Treating these patients and containing the outbreak has become the main priority in any center, arising the risk of possible collateral damage on patients with other acute diseases due to the collapse of the pre‐ and intra‐hospital emergency care systems.Peer reviewe

La lucha por los comunes y las alternativas al desarrollo frente al extractivismo : miradas desde las ecología(s) política(s) latinoamericanas

Este libro aporta nuevos elementos a los urgentes y necesarios cuestionamientos colectivos, teniendo en cuenta los nuevos paradigmas teóricos y políticos de la transformación social en América Latina en un diálogo entre experiencias de construcción de lo común. Las alternativas al desarrollo, nuestro gran desafío desde la ecología política latinoamericana, implica profundizar estas luchas por la producción de lo común hacia una transformación social que debe abordarse simultáneamente en sus complejas relaciones existentes entre capital, clase, raza, colonialidad, género y naturaleza, ya que son precisamente sus tejidos, enredos e interdependencias históricas los que configuran las bases civilizatorias del sistema que enfrentamos. Del Prólogo