Migration and Work: A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Migrant Groups and Their Labor Experiences, Post Migration

Although there is a large body of literature about migration and employment post migration, much of it is limited to study designs restricting either migrant groups or countries. In other words, current research is limited to focusing either a) only on one migrant group (usually expatriates), thereby failing to compare it to other migrant groups within the same country or cross-nationally or b) on multiple migrant groups in one country, thereby making it difficult to draw comparisons cross-nationally across those migrant groups. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to 1) examine the career-related outcomes, post migration, of three types of migrant groups representing a broad array of migrants and 2) to do this cross-nationally using a single design and dataset so as to be able to draw cross-national comparisons and conclusions. To achieve these objectives, I analyzed data about three migrant groups: Employer Sponsored Expatriates (migrants sent on assignment by an employer), Self-Initiated Expatriates (migrants who emigrated on their own initiative for work related reasons, without the support of an employer), and Asylum Grant Migrants (migrants who relocate out of necessity such as on grounds of fear or persecution and were granted asylum). I selected these migrant groups as they represent a broad range of migration types. Data was acquired from the Eurostat Labor Force Survey and its 2014 Ad Hoc module titled “Labor market situations of migrants and their immediate descendants” (EULFS) as well as other sources including project GLOBE’s cultural dimensions, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), O*NET, and the Migration Integration Policy Index (MIPEX). Using a multilevel design which included a micro (immigrant) level and a macro (country) level, I investigated the extent to which to career outcomes (career achievement and financial compensation) vary by migrant groups indirectly through human and social capital resources. On the micro level, I also examined whether these relationships differed by immigrant gender, perceived discrimination (as perceived by the migrants themselves) and cultural distance. Next, I examined similar potential moderation relationships using macro (national) level variables. These variables include national cultural dimensions (Power Distance, Individualism/ Collectivism, Gender Egalitarianism), national policies (GDP per capita, Social Expenditure) and labor market mobility policies. Analysis was primarily done using a multilevel moderated mediation allowing multilevel mediation analyses. Results found that both financial compensation and career achievement differed by migrant group. Social capital was found to mediate the relationship between migrant status and career outcomes. Generally, the direct and indirect effects of migrant status on financial compensation and career achievement were the most harmful for Asylum Granted Migrants and the least harmful for Employer Sponsored Expatriates. Individual level moderators such as gender and perceived discrimination were found to affect the career outcomes of each migrant group differently. Likewise, the group level cultural values as moderators were largely only impactful in the case of Self-Initiated Expatriates where the effects of each cultural value was different. Ultimately the patterns which emerged from my study offer a foundation for cross-national, comparative research on migrant groups. Important implications of my findings for theory and practice are discussed

The Value of Removing Daily Obstacles via Everyday Problem-Solving Theory: Developing an Applied Novel Procedure to Increase Self-Efficacy for Exercise

The objective of the study was to develop a novel procedure to increase self-efficacy for exercise. Gains in one’s ability to resolve day-to-day obstacles for entering an exercise routine were expected to cause an increase in self-efficacy for exercise. Fifty-five sedentary participants (did not exercise regularly for at least 4 months prior to the study) who expressed an intention to exercise in the near future were selected for the study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) an Experimental Group in which they received a problem-solving training session to learn new strategies for solving day-to-day obstacles that interfere with exercise, (2) a Control Group with Problem-Solving Training which received a problem-solving training session focused on a typical day-to-day problem unrelated to exercise, or (3) a Control Group which did not receive any problem-solving training. Assessment of obstacles to exercise and perceived self-efficacy for exercise were conducted at baseline; perceived self-efficacy for exercise was reassessed post-intervention (1 week later). No differences in perceived challenges posed by obstacles to exercise or self-efficacy for exercise were observed across groups at baseline. The Experimental Group reported greater improvement in self-efficacy for exercise compared to the Control Group with Training and the Control Group. Results of this study suggest that a novel procedure that focuses on removing obstacles to intended planned fitness activities is effective in increasing self-efficacy to engage in exercise among sedentary adults. Implications of these findings for use in applied settings and treatment studies are discussed

The Value of Removing Daily Obstacles via Everyday Problem-Solving Theory: Developing an Applied Novel Procedure to Increase Self-Efficacy for Exercise

The objective of the study was to develop a novel procedure to increase self-efficacy for exercise. Gains in one’s ability to resolve day-to-day obstacles for entering an exercise routine were expected to cause an increase in self-efficacy for exercise. Fifty-five sedentary participants (did not exercise regularly for at least 4 months prior to the study) who expressed an intention to exercise in the near future were selected for the study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) an Experimental Group in which they received a problem-solving training session to learn new strategies for solving day-to-day obstacles that interfere with exercise, (2) a Control Group with Problem-Solving Training which received a problem-solving training session focused on a typical day-to-day problem unrelated to exercise, or (3) a Control Group which did not receive any problem-solving training. Assessment of obstacles to exercise and perceived self-efficacy for exercise were conducted at baseline; perceived self-efficacy for exercise was reassessed post-intervention (1 week later). No differences in perceived challenges posed by obstacles to exercise or self-efficacy for exercise were observed across groups at baseline. The Experimental Group reported greater improvement in self-efficacy for exercise compared to the Control Group with Training and the Control Group. Results of this study suggest that a novel procedure that focuses on removing obstacles to intended planned fitness activities is effective in increasing self-efficacy to engage in exercise among sedentary adults. Implications of these findings for use in applied settings and treatment studies are discussed

A Role for the Chemokine RANTES in Regulating CD8 T Cell Responses during Chronic Viral Infection

RANTES (CCL5) is a chemokine expressed by many hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell types that plays an important role in homing and migration of effector and memory T cells during acute infections. The RANTES receptor, CCR5, is a major target of anti-HIV drugs based on blocking viral entry. However, defects in RANTES or RANTES receptors including CCR5 can compromise immunity to acute infections in animal models and lead to more severe disease in humans infected with west Nile virus (WNV). In contrast, the role of the RANTES pathway in regulating T cell responses and immunity during chronic infection remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrate a crucial role for RANTES in the control of systemic chronic LCMV infection. In RANTES−/− mice, virus-specific CD8 T cells had poor cytokine production. These RANTES−/− CD8 T cells also expressed higher amounts of inhibitory receptors consistent with more severe exhaustion. Moreover, the cytotoxic ability of CD8 T cells from RANTES−/− mice was reduced. Consequently, viral load was higher in the absence of RANTES. The dysfunction of T cells in the absence of RANTES was as severe as CD8 T cell responses generated in the absence of CD4 T cell help. Our results demonstrate an important role for RANTES in sustaining CD8 T cell responses during a systemic chronic viral infection

The value of removing daily obstacles via everyday problem solving theory: developing an applied novel procedure to increase self-efficacy for exercise.

The objective of the study was to develop a novel procedure to increase self-efficacy for exercise. Gains in one’s ability to resolve day-to-day obstacles for entering an exercise routine were expected to cause an increase in self-efficacy for exercise. Fifty-five sedentary participants (did not exercise regularly for at least 4 months prior to the study) who expressed an intention to exercise in the near future were selected for the study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) an Experimental Group in which they received a problem-solving training session to learn new strategies for solving day-to-day obstacles that interfere with exercise, (2) a Control Group with Problem-Solving Training which received a problem-solving training session focused on a typical day-to-day problem unrelated to exercise, or (3) a Control Group which did not receive any problem-solving training. Assessment of obstacles to exercise and perceived self-efficacy for exercise were conducted at baseline; perceived self-efficacy for exercise was reassessed post-intervention (1 week later). No differences in perceived challenges posed by obstacles to exercise or self-efficacy for exercise were observed across groups at baseline. The Experimental Group reported greater improvement in self-efficacy for exercise compared to the Control Group with Training and the Control Group. Results of this study suggest that a novel procedure that focuses on removing obstacles to intended planned fitness activities is effective in increasing self-efficacy to engage in exercise among sedentary adults. Implications of these findings for use in applied settings and treatment studies are discussed