16 research outputs found
Monitoring chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Proof-of-concept of a single accelerometer-based feedback algorithm
<div><p>Background</p><p>The use of real-time feedback systems to guide rescuers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly contributes to improve adherence to published resuscitation guidelines. Recently, we designed a novel method for computing depth and rate of chest compressions relying solely on the spectral analysis of chest acceleration. That method was extensively tested in a simulated manikin scenario. The purpose of this study is to report the results of this method as tested in human out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>The algorithm was evaluated retrospectively with seventy five OHCA episodes recorded by monitor-defibrillators equipped with a CPR feedback device. The acceleration signal and the compression signal computed by the CPR feedback device were stored in each episode. The algorithm was continuously applied to the acceleration signals. The depth and rate values estimated every 2-s from the acceleration data were compared to the reference values obtained from the compression signal. The performance of the algorithm was assesed in terms of the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting compressions and in terms of its accuracy through the analysis of measurement error.</p><p>Results</p><p>The algorithm reported a global sensitivity and PPV of 99.98% and 99.79%, respectively. The median (P<sub>75</sub>) unsigned error in depth and rate was 0.9 (1.7) mm and 1.0 (1.7) cpm, respectively. In 95% of the analyzed 2-s windows the error was below 3.5 mm and 3.1 cpm, respectively.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The CPR feedback algorithm proved to be reliable and accurate when tested retrospectively with human OHCA episodes. A new CPR feedback device based on this algorithm could be helpful in the resuscitation field.</p></div
Distributions of the measurement error.
<p>Distribution of the error values for depth (left) and rate (right) in the analyzed 2-s windows.</p
Interval selection.
<p>Graphical examples showing selected and discarded intervals in the episodes. (A) Selected intervals of compressions (C) and no-compressions (NC). (B) Q-CPR compression signal is not available in the presence of chest compressions. (C) Interval with non-consistent computation of compression signal. (D) Noisy acceleration during a compression pause.</p
Distribution of the GS values.
<p>Distribution of the GS compression values for depth (left) and rate (right) in the analyzed 2-s windows.</p
Reconstructed compression signal.
<p>Computed compression signal is depicted in red with the overlapped GS compression signal computed by the Q-CPR technology (in blue).</p
Unsigned error in the estimation of compression depth and rate.
<p>Unsigned error in the estimation of compression depth and rate.</p
Detection of over-ventilation (ventilation rate >10 min<sup>-1</sup>).
<p>Detection of over-ventilation (ventilation rate >10 min<sup>-1</sup>).</p
Enhancing ventilation detection during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by filtering chest compression artifact from the capnography waveform
<div><p>Background</p><p>During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), there is a high incidence of capnograms distorted by chest compression artifact. This phenomenon adversely affects the reliability of automated ventilation detection based on the analysis of the capnography waveform. This study explored the feasibility of several filtering techniques for suppressing the artifact to improve the accuracy of ventilation detection.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>We gathered a database of 232 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest defibrillator recordings containing concurrent capnograms, compression depth and transthoracic impedance signals. Capnograms were classified as non-distorted or distorted by chest compression artifact. All chest compression and ventilation instances were also annotated. Three filtering techniques were explored: a fixed-coefficient (FC) filter, an open-loop (OL) adaptive filter, and a closed-loop (CL) adaptive filter. The improvement in ventilation detection was assessed by comparing the performance of a capnogram-based ventilation detection algorithm with original and filtered capnograms.</p><p>Results</p><p>Sensitivity and positive predictive value of the ventilation algorithm improved from 91.9%/89.5% to 97.7%/96.5% (FC filter), 97.6%/96.7% (OL), and 97.0%/97.1% (CL) for the distorted capnograms (42% of the whole set). The highest improvement was obtained for the artifact named type III, for which performance improved from 77.8%/74.5% to values above 95.5%/94.5%. In addition, errors in the measurement of ventilation rate decreased and accuracy in the detection of over-ventilation increased with filtered capnograms.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Capnogram-based ventilation detection during CPR was enhanced after suppressing the artifact caused by chest compressions. All filtering approaches performed similarly, so the simplicity of fixed-coefficient filters would take advantage for a practical implementation.</p></div
Enhancing ventilation detection during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by filtering chest compression artifact from the capnography waveform - Fig 6
<p><b>(A) Distributions of Se/PPV values per episode in each artifact category, before and after filtering. (B) Distribution of the unsigned error in percentage in the estimation of ventilation rate.</b> Results are provided for all categories: C: clean. D: distorted. I: type I artifact. II: type II; III: type III.</p
Examples of filtering performance.
<p>Original capnogram with clean and distorted respiration cycles (top panel). Detected ventilations are depicted with vertical lines. Distorted ventilations could not be detected by the algorithm. Lower panels show the filtered capnogram (in blue) superimposed to the original capnogram (in gray), for the three filtering alternatives. Detected ventilations are depicted with vertical red dashed lines. In this example, all ventilations were correctly detected after filtering.</p