132 research outputs found
Analyzing Longitudinal wb-MRI Data and Clinical Course in a Cohort of Former Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Patients: Connections between MRI Findings and Clinical Progression Patterns
The purpose of this study was to analyze size and growth dynamics of focal lesions (FL) as well as to quantify diffuse infiltration (DI) in untreated smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) patients and correlate those MRI features with timepoint and cause of progression. We investigated 199 whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI) scans originating from longitudinal imaging of 60 SMM patients and 39 computed tomography (CT) scans for corresponding osteolytic lesions (OL) in 17 patients. All FLs >5 mm were manually segmented to quantify volume and growth dynamics, and DI was scored, rating four compartments separately in T1- and fat-saturated T2-weighted images. The majority of patients with at least two FLs showed substantial spatial heterogeneity in growth dynamics. The volume of the largest FL (p = 0.001, c-index 0.72), the speed of growth of the fastest growing FL (p = 0.003, c-index 0.75), the DI score (DIS, p = 0.014, c-index 0.67), and its dynamic over time (DIS dynamic, p < 0.001, c-index 0.67) all significantly correlated with the time to progression. Size and growth dynamics of FLs correlated significantly with presence/appearance of OL in CT within 2 years after the respective MRI assessment (p = 0.016 and p = 0.022). DIS correlated with decrease of hemoglobin (p < 0.001). In conclusion, size and growth dynamics of FLs correlate with prognosis and local bone destruction. Connections between MRI findings and progression patterns (fast growing FL—OL; DIS—hemoglobin decrease) might enable more precise diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for SMM patients in the future
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation of patients with multiple myeloma in an outpatient setting
Background: High-dose (HD) chemotherapy with melphalan and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) for treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) on an outpatient basis has been well established in the USA and Canada, whereas in Germany and Western Europe an inpatient setting is the current standard. We report on a German single-centre program to offer the procedure on an outpatient basis to selected patients. Methods: Major requirements included: patients had to have family and/or other caregivers, had to be able to reach the hospital within 45 min and have an ECOG performance score of 0–1. Patients with severe co-morbidities were not included. Results: From September 2012 until April 2016, 21 patients with MM stage IIIA were enrolled. All engrafted within the expected time range (median 14 days), and no severe adverse events occurred. 14 patients (67%) had an episode of neutropenic fever and blood cultures were positive in 4 patients (19%). Although rather liberal criteria for hospital admission were applied, 14 patients (67%) were treated entirely on an outpatient basis. Conclusions: HD chemotherapy and ABSCT on an outpatient basis is safe and feasible if it is conducted in an elaborate surveillance program. The feedback from patients was very positive, thus encouraging further expansion of the program
an interim analysis from the prospective GMMG-MM5 trial
We investigated the impact of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in
the MM5 trial of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group which compared
bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide,
and dexamethasone induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Based
on data from relapsed myeloma, the route of administration for bortezomib was
changed from intravenous to subcutaneous after 314 of 604 patients had been
enrolled. We analyzed 598 patients who received at least one dose of trial
medication. Adverse events were reported more frequently in patients treated
with intravenous bortezomib (intravenous=65%; subcutaneous=56%, P=0.02). Rates
of grade 2 or more peripheral neuropathy were higher in patients treated with
intravenous bortezomib during the third cycle (intravenous=8%;
subcutaneous=2%, P=0.001). Overall response rates were similar in patients
treated intravenously or subcutaneously. The presence of International Staging
System stage III disease, renal impairment or adverse cytogenetic
abnormalities did not have a negative impact on overall response rates in
either group. To our knowledge this is the largest study to present data
comparing subcutaneous with intravenous bortezomib in newly diagnosed myeloma.
We show better tolerance and similar overall response rates for subcutaneous
compared to intravenous bortezomib. The clinical trial is registered at
eudract.ema.europa.eu as n. 2010-019173-16
Recommendations for acquisition, interpretation and reporting of whole body low dose CT in patients with multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a report of the IMWG Bone Working Group
Whole Body Low Dose CT (WBLDCT) has important advantages as a first-line imaging modality for bone disease assessment in patients with plasma cell disorders and has been included in the 2014 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria for multiple myeloma (MM) definition. Nevertheless, standardization guidelines for the optimal use of WBLDCT in MM patients are still lacking, preventing its more widespread use, both in daily practice and clinical trials. The aim of this report by the Bone Group of the IMWG is to provide practical recommendations for the acquisition, interpretation and reporting of WBLDCT in patients with multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders
a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone plus subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma
Background Despite novel therapeutic agents, most multiple myeloma (MM)
patients eventually relapse. Two large phase III trials have shown
significantly improved response rates (RR) of lenalidomide/dexamethasone
compared with placebo/dexamethasone in relapsed MM (RMM) patients. These
results have led to the approval of lenalidomide for RMM patients and
lenalidomide/dexamethasone has since become a widely accepted second-line
treatment. Furthermore, in RMM patients consolidation with high-dose
chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to
significantly increase progression free survival (PFS) as compared to
cyclophosphamide in a phase III trial. The randomized prospective ReLApsE
trial is designed to evaluate PFS after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction,
high-dose chemotherapy consolidation plus autologous stem cell transplantation
and lenalidomide maintenance compared with the well-established
lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients. Methods/Design ReLApsE is
a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial in a planned study population
of 282 RMM patients. All patients receive three lenalidomide/dexamethasone
cycles and - in absence of available stem cells from earlier harvesting -
undergo peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvesting. Subsequently,
patients in arm A continue on consecutive lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles,
patients in arm B undergo high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell
transplantation followed by lenalidomide maintenance until discontinuation
criteria are met. Therapeutic response is evaluated after the 3rd (arm A + B)
and the 5th lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycle (arm A) or 2 months after
autologous stem cell transplantation (arm B) and every 3 months thereafter
(arm A + B). After finishing the study treatment, patients are followed up for
survival and subsequent myeloma therapies. The expected trial duration is 6.25
years from first patient in to last patient out. The primary endpoint is PFS,
secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), RR, time to best response
and the influence of early versus late salvage high dose chemotherapy plus
autologous stem cell transplantation on OS. Discussion This phase III trial is
designed to evaluate whether high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell
transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance after lenalidomide/dexamethasone
induction improves PFS compared with the well-established continued
lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients. Trial registration:
ISRCTN16345835 (date of registration 2010-08-24)
Recommended from our members
Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-Body MRI in Myeloma: Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS).
Acknowledging the increasingly important role of whole-body MRI for directing patient care in myeloma, a multidisciplinary, international, and expert panel of radiologists, medical physicists, and hematologists with specific expertise in whole-body MRI in myeloma convened to discuss the technical performance standards, merits, and limitations of currently available imaging methods. Following guidance from the International Myeloma Working Group and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in the United Kingdom, the Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (or MY-RADS) imaging recommendations are designed to promote standardization and diminish variations in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of whole-body MRI in myeloma and allow response assessment. This consensus proposes a core clinical protocol for whole-body MRI and an extended protocol for advanced assessments. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article
Minimal residual disease in Myeloma: Application for clinical care and new drug registration
The development of novel agents has transformed the treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma, with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity now achievable across the entire disease spectrum. Bone marrow–based technologies to assess MRD, including approaches using next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing, have provided real-time clinical tools for the sensitive detection and monitoring of MRD in patients with multiple myeloma. Complementary liquid biopsy–based assays are now quickly progressing with some, such as mass spectrometry methods, being very close to clinical use, while others utilizing nucleic acid–based technologies are still developing and will prove important to further our understanding of the biology of MRD. On the regulatory front, multiple retrospective individual patient and clinical trial level meta-analyses have already shown and will continue to assess the potential of MRD as a surrogate for patient outcome. Given all this progress, it is not surprising that a number of clinicians are now considering using MRD to inform real-world clinical care of patients across the spectrum from smoldering myeloma to relapsed refractory multiple myeloma, with each disease setting presenting key challenges and questions that will need to be addressed through clinical trials. The pace of advances in targeted and immune therapies in multiple myeloma is unprecedented, and novel MRD-driven biomarker strategies are essential to accelerate innovative clinical trials leading to regulatory approval of novel treatments and continued improvement in patient outcomes
- …