1,410 research outputs found

    The Dilemma of the Senior Woman Administrator Role in Intercollegiate Athletics

    Get PDF
    All National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) member institutions designate the highest-ranking woman in athletic administration the senior woman administrator (SWA). This role is “intended to encourage and promote the involvement” of women in decision-making, enhance the representation women’s experiences and perspectives, and support women’s interests in intercollegiate athletics (NCAA, n.d. [a]). However, previous research reveals inconsistency in the tasks and responsibilities associated with the SWA role. Furthermore, it is not well established if this role is a mechanism to advance women to leadership roles or a terminal position (Hatfield, 2009). To better understand the influence of the SWA role on the advancement of women leaders, this research introduces the historical context of women’s leadership in higher education. This historical context draws on the strategies women leaders used prior to the passage of Title IX. These strategies form a framework to analyze interview data with women who hold the SWA title among Division I institutions in the Far West. Findings illustrate four dilemmas – The Early “SWA” vs. Today’s Senior Associate Athletic Administrator, The SWA – The Sole Woman Administrator?, The SWA and Title IX, The SWA As A Terminal Position, and, “My SWA” – The Senior Woman Advocate. Together these dilemmas characterize this role and its limitations for promoting a critical mass of women leaders in intercollegiate athletics

    Making Washington’s Shoreline Master Programs Climate Smart

    Get PDF
    Shoreline Master Programs (SMPs) are the vehicle through which local jurisdictions implement Washington’s Shoreline Management Act, the legal framework for shoreline management throughout the State. While Washington’s coastal communities, economies, and ecosystems will see significant climate change impacts, including increased erosion, sea level rise, and ocean acidification, SMPs have not traditionally incorporated these factors. Ecology released interim guidance on incorporating sea level rise into SMPs in 2010, and is working on updated guidance now. This talk will focus primarily on options for incorporating climate change into the inventory and characterization (I&C) phase of the SMP process, which provides the scientific input for decisions in later phases of the process. Information covered by the I&C must address “attributes that pertain to existing and emerging problems and issues in a jurisdiction.” To address climate-related “existing and emerging problems and issues”, jurisdictions need to inventory information on the extent to which these phenomena are already seen along Washington’s coasts, and on plausible future trajectories. In addition to physical and chemical changes, the inventory could include information on changes in the distribution of ecologically, culturally, and commercially important species and critical habitats. The I&C must also describe ecosystem-wide and shoreline processes, functions, opportunities for restoration, public access, and shoreline use. Possibilities for addressing climate change in this stage include: 1. Highlight processes of particular importance for vulnerability or resilience, such as integrated analysis of processes contributing to coastal erosion and accretion, or to the delivery, retention, and toxicity of pollutants. 2. Highlight climate adaptation-related functions or effects of climatic changes on desired functions, such as water storage or temperature regulation of aquatic habitats 3. Incorporate information on vulnerability to acidification, sea level rise, and other climate-related changes into restoration site selection, prioritization, and design. 4. Incorporate information on vulnerability to sea level rise, increased flood severity, and other climate-related changes into plans for public access and shoreline use. 5. For No Net Loss calculations, estimate loss and change due to ongoing climatic and related changes as well as interactions between these and proposed land use changes. 6. Include maps of vulnerability or resilience ratings to inform environmental designations or overlay zones in which to apply special protection While incorporating climatic changes, effects, and risks into shoreline planning will take some changes, it is eminently feasible. It is also essential to the resilience and long-term sustainability of Washington’s coastal communities, economies and ecosystems

    REFERRAL DECISIONS OF TEACHERS AND SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS FOR TWICE-EXCEPTIONAL STUDENTS

    Get PDF
    The accurate and timely referral and identification of twice-exceptional students remains a challenge. In a statewide study, the referral decisions for both special education and gifted programming evaluations made by four participant groups (i.e., general education teachers, special education teachers, gifted education teachers, and school psychologists) were compared. Participants were randomly assigned to read one of three identically described students in a vignette that differed only in the presence of a diagnostic label—autism spectrum disorder (ASD), specific learning disability (SLD), or no diagnostic label. In all, special education teachers made the most special education referrals, while gifted education teachers made the most gifted programming referrals, both regardless of the diagnostic label present. The students with diagnostic labels were recommended for special education referrals significantly more than for gifted programming, while this difference was not evident in the no diagnostic label condition. Moreover, the student with the ASD label was the most likely to be referred for evaluations for both special education and gifted programming out of all three vignette conditions. Overall findings indicated the importance of considering the referral source as well as how the presence of a diagnostic label might influence educational referral decisions, particularly in how this might influence overall multidisciplinary team decisions for these unique learners

    Stellar Polarimetry: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

    Full text link
    On the final day of the Stellar Polarimetry conference, participants split up into three "breakout sessions" to discuss the future of the field in the areas of instrumentation, upcoming opportunities, and community priorities. This contribution compiles the major recommendations arising from each breakout session. We hope that the polarimetric community will find these ideas useful as we consider how to maintain the vitality of polarimetry in the coming years.Comment: 7 pages, published in proceedings of "Stellar Polarimetry: From Birth to Death" (Madison, WI, June 2011
    • …
    corecore