16 research outputs found

    Real-world outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease initiating long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy

    No full text
    Background: Randomized clinical trials have shown long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy to be efficacious in improving lung function and dyspnea, while reducing exacerbations; however, less is known regarding the effectiveness in routine clinical practice. This study examined treatment patterns, rescue medication use, healthcare resource utilization and costs, and exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who initiated long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy in real-world settings. Methods: This retrospective study used US claims data from adult patients with COPD initiating long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy between 1 January 2008 and 31 January 2015. Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment 12 months prior to (baseline period) and 12 months following therapy initiation (follow-up period). Outcomes, including treatment patterns, rescue medication use, exacerbations, and healthcare utilization and costs, were measured until the earliest of treatment augmentation or discontinuation, death, health plan disenrollment, or the end of the study period. Results were analyzed descriptively for all measures. Baseline and follow-up measures of all-cause and COPD-related healthcare costs and exacerbations [per patient per month (PPPM)] were compared using paired t tests. Results: Among 27,394 patients with a mean follow up of 6.3 months, 18.2% augmented, 74.2% discontinued, and 7.6% continued long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy. Rescue medication use was prevalent during the follow-up period, with an average of 1.0 short-acting β agonist (SABA) fills/month and 0.8 short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) fills/month, among patients with at least one fill for the medication of interest. PPPM mean number of exacerbations was more than triple (0.17 versus 0.05, p < 0.001) and PPPM exacerbation-related costs were more than double over the follow-up period compared with baseline (1070versus1070 versus 485). COPD-related costs accounted for 50% of all-cause costs during the follow-up period and were significantly higher compared with baseline (1206versus1206 versus 592, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients initiating long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy had high rates of medication discontinuation or augmentation. Patients used more rescue medications and experienced significantly more COPD exacerbations with higher healthcare costs compared with baseline. Further research is warranted to determine whether more aggressive initial therapy would result in symptom improvement

    Herpes zoster incidence and cost in patients receiving autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant

    Get PDF
    <p><b>Objective:</b> Among patients receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Auto-HSCT), this study estimated the incidence of herpes zoster (HZ), compared healthcare costs among patients with and without HZ, and evaluated antiviral prophylaxis (AP) use.</p> <p><b>Research design and methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted using data from a large health plan to identify patients ≥18 years with ≥1 claim for an Auto-HSCT procedure during 2006–2011 (<i>n</i> = 2,530). Patients were followed from date of Auto-HSCT until risk-end date, defined as development of HZ, end of enrollment, death, or December 31, 2011. HZ incidence was calculated as cases observed after Auto-HSCT, divided by accrued time-at-risk in person-years (PY). AP use and duration were defined by prescription fills. One-year medical and pharmacy costs were calculated as combined health plan and patient paid amounts.</p> <p><b>Main outcome measures:</b> HZ incidence and healthcare costs were calculated using administrative claims data.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Overall HZ incidence was 62.2/1,000 PY (95% CI = 54.3–70.9). Most (72.3%) patients were prescribed AP. During the first 90-days post-Auto-HSCT, patients without AP had increased incidence (151.6/1,000 PY, 95% CI = 88.3–242.6) compared to those prescribed AP pre- (30.9/1,000 PY, 95% CI = 11.3–67.2) or post-Auto-HSCT (33.0/1,000 PY, 95% CI = 13.3–67.9). Total adjusted mean 1-year all-cause healthcare costs were 74,875forpatientswhodevelopedHZand74,875 for patients who developed HZ and 70,279 for patients who did not (difference = $4,596 (cost ratio = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.86–1.32, <i>p</i> = .566)).</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> HZ incidence was high, despite AP use. Mean annual healthcare costs were higher for patients with HZ, but the difference was not statistically significant. An effective vaccine against HZ could be useful in decreasing both incidence of and cost for HZ in this population.</p

    Herpes zoster incidence and cost in patients receiving autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant

    No full text
    <p><b>Objective:</b> Among patients receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Auto-HSCT), this study estimated the incidence of herpes zoster (HZ), compared healthcare costs among patients with and without HZ, and evaluated antiviral prophylaxis (AP) use.</p> <p><b>Research design and methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted using data from a large health plan to identify patients ≥18 years with ≥1 claim for an Auto-HSCT procedure during 2006–2011 (<i>n</i> = 2,530). Patients were followed from date of Auto-HSCT until risk-end date, defined as development of HZ, end of enrollment, death, or December 31, 2011. HZ incidence was calculated as cases observed after Auto-HSCT, divided by accrued time-at-risk in person-years (PY). AP use and duration were defined by prescription fills. One-year medical and pharmacy costs were calculated as combined health plan and patient paid amounts.</p> <p><b>Main outcome measures:</b> HZ incidence and healthcare costs were calculated using administrative claims data.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Overall HZ incidence was 62.2/1,000 PY (95% CI = 54.3–70.9). Most (72.3%) patients were prescribed AP. During the first 90-days post-Auto-HSCT, patients without AP had increased incidence (151.6/1,000 PY, 95% CI = 88.3–242.6) compared to those prescribed AP pre- (30.9/1,000 PY, 95% CI = 11.3–67.2) or post-Auto-HSCT (33.0/1,000 PY, 95% CI = 13.3–67.9). Total adjusted mean 1-year all-cause healthcare costs were 74,875forpatientswhodevelopedHZand74,875 for patients who developed HZ and 70,279 for patients who did not (difference = $4,596 (cost ratio = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.86–1.32, <i>p</i> = .566)).</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> HZ incidence was high, despite AP use. Mean annual healthcare costs were higher for patients with HZ, but the difference was not statistically significant. An effective vaccine against HZ could be useful in decreasing both incidence of and cost for HZ in this population.</p

    Comparative effectiveness of different treatment pathways for opioid use disorder.

    No full text
    Question: What is the real-world effectiveness of different treatment pathways for opioid use disorder? Findings: In this comparative effectiveness research study of 40 885 adults with opioid use disorder that compared 6 different treatment pathways, only treatment with buprenorphine or methadone was associated with reduced risk of overdose and serious opioid-related acute care use compared with no treatment during 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Meaning: Methadone and buprenorphine were associated with reduced overdose and opioid-related morbidity compared with opioid antagonist therapy, inpatient treatment, or intensive outpatient behavioral interventions and may be used as first-line treatments for opioid use disorder
    corecore