Parikh Automata over Infinite Words

Parikh automata extend finite automata by counters that can be tested for membership in a semilinear set, but only at the end of a run, thereby preserving many of the desirable algorithmic properties of finite automata. Here, we study the extension of the classical framework onto infinite inputs: We introduce reachability, safety, B\"uchi, and co-B\"uchi Parikh automata on infinite words and study expressiveness, closure properties, and the complexity of verification problems. We show that almost all classes of automata have pairwise incomparable expressiveness, both in the deterministic and the nondeterministic case; a result that sharply contrasts with the well-known hierarchy in the $\omega$-regular setting. Furthermore, emptiness is shown decidable for Parikh automata with reachability or B\"uchi acceptance, but undecidable for safety and co-B\"uchi acceptance. Most importantly, we show decidability of model checking with specifications given by deterministic Parikh automata with safety or co-B\"uchi acceptance, but also undecidability for all other types of automata. Finally, solving games is undecidable for all types

New Lower Bounds for Reachability in Vector Addition Systems

We investigate the dimension-parametric complexity of the reachability problem in vector addition systems with states (VASS) and its extension with pushdown stack (pushdown VASS). Up to now, the problem is known to be $\mathcal{F}_k$-hard for VASS of dimension $3k+2$ (the complexity class $\mathcal{F}_k$ corresponds to the $k$th level of the fast-growing hierarchy), and no essentially better bound is known for pushdown VASS. We provide a new construction that improves the lower bound for VASS: $\mathcal{F}_k$-hardness in dimension $2k+3$. Furthermore, building on our new insights we show a new lower bound for pushdown VASS: $\mathcal{F}_k$-hardness in dimension $\frac k 2 + 4$. This dimension-parametric lower bound is strictly stronger than the upper bound for VASS, which suggests that the (still unknown) complexity of the reachability problem in pushdown VASS is higher than in plain VASS (where it is Ackermann-complete)

History-deterministic Parikh Automata

Parikh automata extend finite automata by counters that can be tested for membership in a semilinear set, but only at the end of a run. Thereby, they preserve many of the desirable properties of finite automata. Deterministic Parikh automata are strictly weaker than nondeterministic ones, but enjoy better closure and algorithmic properties. This state of affairs motivates the study of intermediate forms of nondeterminism. Here, we investigate history-deterministic Parikh automata, i.e., automata whose nondeterminism can be resolved on the fly. This restricted form of nondeterminism is well-suited for applications which classically call for determinism, e.g., solving games and composition. We show that history-deterministic Parikh automata are strictly more expressive than deterministic ones, incomparable to unambiguous ones, and enjoy almost all of the closure and some of the algorithmic properties of deterministic automata.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2207.0769

A Bit of Nondeterminism Makes Pushdown Automata Expressive and Succinct

We study the expressiveness and succinctness of good-for-games pushdown automata (GFG-PDA) over finite words, that is, pushdown automata whose nondeterminism can be resolved based on the run constructed so far, but independently of the remainder of the input word. We prove that GFG-PDA recognise more languages than deterministic PDA (DPDA) but not all context-free languages (CFL). This class is orthogonal to unambiguous CFL. We further show that GFG-PDA can be exponentially more succinct than DPDA, while PDA can be double-exponentially more succinct than GFG-PDA. We also study GFGness in visibly pushdown automata (VPA), which enjoy better closure properties than PDA, and for which we show GFGness to be EXPTIME-complete. GFG-VPA can be exponentially more succinct than deterministic VPA, while VPA can be exponentially more succinct than GFG-VPA. Both of these lower bounds are tight. Finally, we study the complexity of resolving nondeterminism in GFG-PDA. Every GFG-PDA has a positional resolver, a function that resolves nondeterminism and that is only dependant on the current configuration. Pushdown transducers are sufficient to implement the resolvers of GFG-VPA, but not those of GFG-PDA. GFG-PDA with finite-state resolvers are determinisable

Algorithmic Properties of Transducers

In this thesis, we consider three fundamental problems of transducers theory. The containment problem asks, given two transducers,whether the relation defined by the first is included into the relation defined by the second. The equivalence problem asks, given two transducers,whether they define the same relation. Finally, the sequential uniformisation problem,corresponding to the synthesis problem in the setting of transducers,asks, given a transducer, whether it is possible to deterministically pick an output correspondingto each input of its domain. These three decision problems are undecidable in general. As a first step, we consider different manners of recovering the decidability of the three problems considered.First, we characterise a family of classes of transducers, called controlled by effective languages, for which the containment and equivalence problems are decidable. Second, we add structural constraints to the problems considered: for instance, instead of only asking that two transducers define the same relation, we require that this relation is defined by both transducers in a similar way. This `similarity' is formalised through the notion of delay,used to measure the difference between the output production of two transducers. This allows us to introduce stronger decidable versions of our three decision problems, which we use to prove the decidability of the original problems in the setting of finite-valued transducers. In the second part, we study extensions of the automaton model,together with the adaptation of the sequential uniformisation problems to these new settings.Weighted automata are automata which,along each transition, output a weight in Z. Then, whereas a transducer preserves all the output mapped to a given input, weighted automata only preserve the maximal weight. In this setting, the sequential uniformisation problem turns into the determinisation problem: given a weighted automaton, is it possible to deterministically pick the maximal output mapped to each input? The decidability of this problem is open.The notion of delay allows us to devise a complete semi-algorithm deciding it. Finally, we consider two-way transducers, that are allowed to move back and forth over the input tape. These transducers enjoy good properties with respect to the sequential uniformisation problem: every transducer admits a sequential two-way uniformiser. We strengthen this result by showing that every transducer admits a reversible two-way uniformiser, i.e. a uniformiser that is both sequential and cosequential (backward sequential).Doctorat en Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublishe

Multi-Sequential Word Relations

Rational relations are binary relations of finite words that are realised by non-deterministic finite state transducers (NFT). A multi-sequential relation is a rational relation which is equal to a finite union of (graphs) of partial sequential functions, i.e. functions realised by input-deterministic transducers. The particular case of multi-sequential functions was studied by Choffrut and Schützenberger who proved that given a rational function (as a transducer), it is decidable whether it is multi-sequential. Their procedure is based on an effective characterisation of unambiguous transducers that do not define multi-sequential functions, that we call the fork property. In this paper, we show that the fork property also characterises the class of transducers that do not define multi-sequential relations. Moreover, we prove that the fork property can be decided in PTime. This leads to a PTime procedure which, given a transducer, decides whether it defines a multi-sequential relation.SCOPUS: cp.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Determinisation and Unambiguisation of Polynomially-Ambiguous Rational Weighted Automata

We study the determinisation and unambiguisation problems of weighted automata over the rational field: Given a weighted automaton, can we determine whether there exists an equivalent deterministic, respectively unambiguous, weighted automaton? Recent results by Bell and Smertnig show that the problem is decidable, however they do not provide any complexity bounds. We show that both problems are in PSPACE for polynomially-ambiguous weighted automata

The Complexity of Transducer Synthesis from Multi-Sequential Specifications

International audienceThe transducer synthesis problem on finite words asks, given a specification S ⊆ I × O, where I and O are sets of finite words, whether there exists an implementation f : I → O which (1) fulfils the specification, i.e., (i, f (i)) ∈ S for all i ∈ I, and (2) can be defined by some input-deterministic (aka sequential) transducer T f. If such an implementation f exists, the procedure should also output T f. The realisability problem is the corresponding decision problem. For specifications given by synchronous transducers (which read and write alternately one symbol), this is the finite variant of the classical synthesis problem on ω-words, solved by Büchi and Landweber in 1969, and the realisability problem is known to be ExpTime-c in both finite and ω-word settings. For specifications given by asynchronous transducers (which can write a batch of symbols, or none, in a single step), the realisability problem is known to be undecidable. We consider here the class of multi-sequential specifications, defined as finite unions of sequential transducers over possibly incomparable domains. We provide optimal decision procedures for the realisability problem in both the synchronous and asynchronous setting, showing that it is PSpace-c. Moreover, whenever the specification is realisable, we expose the construction of a sequential transducer that realises it and has a size that is doubly exponential, which we prove to be optimal. Acknowledgements We warmly thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and Christof Löding for pointing us to some related references

Aperiodic String Transducers

International audienceRegular string-to-string functions enjoy a nice triple characterization through deterministic two-way transducers (2DFT), streaming string transducers (SST) and MSO definable functions. This result has recently been lifted to FO definable functions, with equivalent representations by means of aperiodic 2DFT and aperiodic 1-bounded SST, extending a well-known result on regular languages. In this paper, we give three direct transformations: i) from 1-bounded SST to 2DFT, ii) from 2DFT to copyless SST, and iii) from k-bounded to 1-bounded SST. We give the complexity of each construction and also prove that they preserve the aperiodicity of transducers. As corollaries, we obtain that FO definable string-to-string functions are equivalent to SST whose transition monoid is finite and aperiodic, and to aperiodic copyless SST