5 research outputs found
Psychological interventions to prevent the onset of depressive disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Purpose: Depressive disorders are common and have a considerable impact on patients and societies. Several
treatments are available, but their effects are modest and reduce the burden only to a limited extent. Preventing
the onset of depressive disorders may be one option to further reduce the global disease burden.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in participants without a diagnosis of
depression at baseline, who were assigned to a preventive psychological intervention, or a care-as-usual, or
comparable control group and in which incident cases of depression at follow-up were ascertained with a
diagnostic interview.
Results: Our systematic searches resulted in 50 trials (14,665 participants) with relatively high quality, in high
risk groups of all ages. The psychological interventions were mostly based on cognitive behavioral interventions.
One year after the preventive interventions, the relative risk of developing a depressive disorder was RR = 0.81
(95% CI: 0.72â0.91), indicating that those who had received the intervention had 19% less chance to develop a
depressive disorder. Given the average control event rate of 30%, twenty-one people had to participate in the
intervention to prevent one depressive disorder compared to people in the control conditions.
Conclusions: Prevention is a promising approach to reduce the global disease burden of depression in addition to
treatments
Comparison of the efficacy of long-lasting insecticidal nets PermaNetÂź 2.0 and OlysetÂź against Anopheles albimanus under laboratory conditions
Insecticide-treated nets provide a reduction in human-vector contact through physical barrier, mortality and/or repellent effects that protect both users and non-users, thereby protecting the wider community from vector-borne diseases like malaria. Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) are the best alternative. This study evaluated the bioefficacy of LLINs PermaNetÂź 2.0 and OlysetÂź under laboratory conditions with Anopheles albimanus. The laboratory strain was evaluated for insecticide susceptibility with selected insecticides used for malarial control. Regeneration time and wash resistance were evaluated with the standard bioassay cone technique following WHO guidelines. Heat assistance was used for OlysetÂź nets; the nets were exposed to four different temperatures to speed the regeneration process. The regeneration study of PermaNetÂź 2.0 showed that efficacy was fully recovered by 24 h after one and three washes and wash resistance persisted for 15 washes. Regeneration of OlysetÂź nets was not observed for nets washed three times, even with the different temperature exposures for up to seven days. Thus, for OlysetÂź the wash resistance evaluation could not proceed. Differences in response between the two LLINs may be associated with differences in manufacturing procedures and species response to the evaluated LLINs. PermaNetÂź 2.0 showed higher and continuous efficacy against An. albimanus
Comparison of the efficacy of long-lasting insecticidal nets PermaNetÂź 2.0 and OlysetÂź against Anopheles albimanus under laboratory conditions
Insecticide-treated nets provide a reduction in human-vector contact through physical barrier, mortality and/or repellent effects that protect both users and non-users, thereby protecting the wider community from vector-borne diseases like malaria. Long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) are the best alternative. This study evaluated the bioefficacy of LLINs PermaNetÂź 2.0 and OlysetÂź under laboratory conditions with Anopheles albimanus. The laboratory strain was evaluated for insecticide susceptibility with selected insecticides used for malarial control. Regeneration time and wash resistance were evaluated with the standard bioassay cone technique following WHO guidelines. Heat assistance was used for OlysetÂź nets; the nets were exposed to four different temperatures to speed the regeneration process. The regeneration study of PermaNetÂź 2.0 showed that efficacy was fully recovered by 24 h after one and three washes and wash resistance persisted for 15 washes. Regeneration of OlysetÂź nets was not observed for nets washed three times, even with the different temperature exposures for up to seven days. Thus, for OlysetÂź the wash resistance evaluation could not proceed. Differences in response between the two LLINs may be associated with differences in manufacturing procedures and species response to the evaluated LLINs. PermaNetÂź 2.0 showed higher and continuous efficacy against An. albimanus
Corrigendum to âPsychological interventions to prevent the onset of depressive disorders A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsâ [Clinical Psychology Review 83 (2021) 101955]
The authors regret that in this paper the NNT was not correctly reported in the Abstract and in the Discussion. The correct NNT is 18.8 (as reported in the Results section). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
Background
Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks.
Methods
The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned.
Results
A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31).
Conclusion
Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)