93 research outputs found
A comparison of sexual dimorphism and range of variation in Papio cynocephalus and Gorilla gorilla dentition
The dentitions of 48 baboons ( Papio cynocephalus ) and 242 gorillas ( Gorilla gorilla ) are compared metrically and the baboons are found to have a greater range of variation, and greater sexual dimorphism than the gorillas. This is explained in terms of the different ecologies of these species: life on the African savannah, with its sharp seasonal changes in available food, seems to have given selective advantage to broader niches than life in the rain forest. Further, the historic continuity of the savannah has provided fewer chances for allopatric speciation than the rain forest. These contrasts between forest and savannah speciation should provide insights into hominid evolution. In trying to judge whether australopithecines, probable savannah residents, can be lumped into one or several species, based upon dental variability, a comparison with baboons should be more informative than the now frequently used contrast with gorillas.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41597/1/10329_2006_Article_BF02381794.pd
Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes : Selecting candidate performance indicators
In the scope of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) subgroup was tasked to identify breast cancer screening programme (BCSP) performance indicators, including their acceptable and desirable levels, which are associated with breast cancer (BC) mortality. This paper documents the methodology used for the indicator selection. The indicators were identified through a multi-stage process. First, a scoping review was conducted to identify existing performance indicators. Second, building on existing frameworks for making well-informed health care choices, a specific conceptual framework was developed to guide the indicator selection. Third, two group exercises including a rating and ranking survey were conducted for indicator selection using pre-determined criteria, such as: relevance, measurability, accurateness, ethics and understandability. The selected indicators were mapped onto a BC screening pathway developed by the M&E subgroup to illustrate the steps of BC screening common to all EU countries. A total of 96 indicators were identified from an initial list of 1325 indicators. After removing redundant and irrelevant indicators and adding those missing, 39 candidate indicators underwent the rating and ranking exercise. Based on the results, the M&E subgroup selected 13 indicators: screening coverage, participation rate, recall rate, breast cancer detection rate, invasive breast cancer detection rate, cancers > 20 mm, cancers ≤10 mm, lymph node status, interval cancer rate, episode sensitivity, time interval between screening and first treatment, benign open surgical biopsy rate, and mastectomy rate. This systematic approach led to the identification of 13 BCSP candidate performance indicators to be further evaluated for their association with BC mortality
Recommended from our members
An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics
Efforts to identify meaningful functional imaging-based biomarkers are limited by the ability to reliably characterize inter-individual differences in human brain function. Although a growing number of connectomics-based measures are reported to have moderate to high test-retest reliability, the variability in data acquisition, experimental designs, and analytic methods precludes the ability to generalize results. The Consortium for Reliability and Reproducibility (CoRR) is working to address this challenge and establish test-retest reliability as a minimum standard for methods development in functional connectomics. Specifically, CoRR has aggregated 1,629 typical individuals’ resting state fMRI (rfMRI) data (5,093 rfMRI scans) from 18 international sites, and is openly sharing them via the International Data-sharing Neuroimaging Initiative (INDI). To allow researchers to generate various estimates of reliability and reproducibility, a variety of data acquisition procedures and experimental designs are included. Similarly, to enable users to assess the impact of commonly encountered artifacts (for example, motion) on characterizations of inter-individual variation, datasets of varying quality are included
- …