60 research outputs found

    Optimization of prostate MRI acquisition and post-processing protocol: a pictorial review with access to acquisition protocols

    Get PDF
    The aim of this review article is to provide insight into the optimization of 1.5-Testla (T) and 3-T prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An approach for optimization of data quantification, especially diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is provided. Benefits and limitations of various pulse sequences are discussed. Importable MRI protocols and access to imaging datasets is provided. Careful optimization of prostate MR acquisition protocol allows the acquisition of high-quality prostate MRI using clinical 1.5-T/3-T MR scanners with an overall acquisition time<15min

    Tournament Leave-pair-out Cross-validation for Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis

    Full text link
    Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is widely used for evaluating diagnostic systems. Recent studies have shown that estimating an area under ROC curve (AUC) with standard cross-validation methods suffers from a large bias. The leave-pair-out (LPO) cross-validation has been shown to correct this bias. However, while LPO produces an almost unbiased estimate of AUC, it does not provide a ranking of the data needed for plotting and analyzing the ROC curve. In this study, we propose a new method called tournament leave-pair-out (TLPO) cross-validation. This method extends LPO by creating a tournament from pair comparisons to produce a ranking for the data. TLPO preserves the advantage of LPO for estimating AUC, while it also allows performing ROC analysis. We have shown using both synthetic and real world data that TLPO is as reliable as LPO for AUC estimation and confirmed the bias in leave-one-out cross-validation on low-dimensional data.Comment: 13 pages, 8 figure

    Quicksort leave-pair-out cross-validation for ROC curve analysis

    Get PDF
    Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and area under the ROC curve (AUC) are commonly used performance measures in diagnostic systems. In this work, we assume a setting, where a classifier is inferred from multivariate data to predict the diagnostic outcome for new cases. Cross-validation is a resampling method for estimating the prediction performance of a classifier on data not used for inferring it. Tournament leave-pair-out (TLPO) cross-validation has been shown to be better than other resampling methods at producing a ranking of data that can be used for estimating the ROC curves and areas under them. However, the time complexity of TLPOCV, O(n(2)), means that it is impractical in many applications. In this article, a method called quicksort leave-pair-out cross-validation (QLPOCV) is presented in order to decrease the time complexity of obtaining a reliable ranking of data to O(n log n). The proposed method is compared with existing ones in an experimental study, demonstrating that in terms of ROC curves and AUC values QLPOCV produces as accurate performance estimation as TLPOCV, outperforming both k-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation

    Comparison of standardized uptake values between Tc-99m-HDP SPECT/CT and F-18-NaF PET/CT in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer

    Get PDF
    Background: Despite recent technological advances allowing for quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative SPECT has not been widely used in the clinical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative SPECT for measuring metastatic bone uptake in breast and prostate cancer by comparing standard uptake values (SUVs) measured with Tc-99m-HDP SPECT/CT and F-18-NaF PET/CT.Methods: Twenty-six breast and 27 prostate cancer patients at high risk of bone metastases underwent both Tc-99m-HDP SPECT/CT and F-18-NaF PET/CT within 14days of each other. The SPECT and PET data were reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation-maximization algorithms achieving quantitative images. Metastatic and benign skeletal lesions visible in both data sets were identified, and their maximum, peak, and mean SUVs (SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean) were determined. SUV ratios (SUVRs) between the lesions and adjacent normal appearing bone were also calculated. Linear regression was used to evaluate the correlations between the SUVs of SPECT and PET and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the differences between the SUVs and SUVRs of SPECT and PET.Results: A total of 231 skeletal lesions, 129 metastatic and 102 benign, were analyzed. All three SUV measures correlated very strongly between SPECT and PET (R(2)0.80, pConclusion: The strong correlation between SUVs and similar SUVRs of Tc-99m-HDP SPECT/CT and F-18-NaF PET/CT demonstrate that SPECT is an applicable tool for clinical quantification of bone metabolism in osseous metastases in breast and prostate cancer patients.</div

    Comparison of reprojected bone SPECT/CT and planar bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in breast and prostate cancer

    Get PDF
    Objective The aim of this study was to compare reprojected bone SPECT/CT (RBS) against planar bone scintigraphy (BS) in the detection of bone metastases in breast and prostate cancer patients. Methods Twenty-six breast and 105 prostate cancer patients with high risk for bone metastases underwent Tc-99m-HMDP BS and whole-body SPECT/CT, 1.5-T whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI and F-18-NaF or F-18-PSMA-1007 PET/CT within two prospective clinical trials (NCT01339780 and NCT03537391). Consensus reading of all imaging modalities and follow-up data were used to define the reference standard diagnosis. The SPECT/CT data were reprojected into anterior and posterior views to produce RBS images. Both BS and RBS images were independently double read by two pairs of experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The findings were validated against the reference standard diagnosis and compared between BS and RBS on the patient, region and lesion levels. Results All metastatic patients detected by BS were also detected by RBS. In addition, three metastatic patients were missed by BS but detected by RBS. The average patient-level sensitivity of two readers for metastases was 75% for BS and 87% for RBS, and the corresponding specificity was 79% for BS and 39% for RBS. The average region-level sensitivity of two readers was 64% for BS and 69% for RBS, and the corresponding specificity was 96% for BS and 87% for RBS. Conclusion Whole-body bone SPECT/CT can be reprojected into more familiar anterior and posterior planar images with excellent sensitivity for bone metastases, making additional acquisition of planar BS unnecessary.Peer reviewe

    Statistical Evaluation of Different Mathematical Models for Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer Xenografts in Mice

    Get PDF
    Purpose To evaluate fitting quality and repeatability of four mathematical models for diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) during tumor progression in mouse xenograft model of prostate cancer.Methods Human prostate cancer cells (PC-3) were implanted subcutaneously in right hind limbs of 11 immunodeficient mice. Tumor growth was followed by weekly DWI examinations using a 7T MR scanner. Additional DWI examination was performed after repositioning following the fourth DWI examination to evaluate short term repeatability. DWI was performed using 15 and 12 b-values in the ranges of 0-500 and 0-2000 s/mm(2), respectively. Corrected Akaike information criteria and F-ratio were used to evaluate fitting quality of each model (mono-exponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and bi-exponential).Results Significant changes were observed in DWI data during the tumor growth, indicated by ADC(m), ADC(s), and ADC(k). Similar results were obtained using low as well as high b-values. No marked changes in model preference were present between the weeks 1-4. The parameters of the mono-exponential, stretched exponential, and kurtosis models had smaller confidence interval and coefficient of repeatability values than the parameters of the bi-exponential model.Conclusion Stretched exponential and kurtosis models showed better fit to DWI data than the mono-exponential model and presented with good repeatability.</p

    Prospective comparison of F-18-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, whole-body MRI and CT in primary nodal staging of unfavourable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

    Get PDF
    Purpose To prospectively compare F-18-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and standard computed tomography (CT), in primary nodal staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Men with newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate- or high-risk PCa prospectively underwent F-18-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, WBMRI with DWI and contrast-enhanced CT within a median of 8 days. Six readers (two for each modality) independently reported pelvic lymph nodes as malignant, equivocal or benign while blinded to the other imaging modalities. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were reported according to optimistic (equivocal lesions interpreted as benign) and pessimistic (equivocal lesions interpreted as malignant) analyses. The reference standard diagnosis was based on multidisciplinary consensus meetings where available histopathology, clinical and follow-up data were used. Results Seventy-nine patients completed all the imaging modalities, except for one case of interrupted WBMRI. Thirty-one (39%) patients had pelvic lymph node metastases, which were detected in 27/31 (87%), 14/31 (45%) and 8/31 (26%) patients by F-18-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, WBMRI with DWI and CT, respectively (optimistic analysis). In 8/31 (26%) patients, only F-18-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detected malignant lymph nodes, while the other two imaging modalities were reported as negative. At the patient level, sensitivity and specificity values for F-18-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, WBMRI with DWI and CT in optimistic analysis were 0.87 (95%CI 0.71-0.95) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.89-1.00), 0.37 (95%CI 0.22-0.55) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.89-1.00) and 0.26 (95%CI 0.14-0.43) and 1.00 (95%CI 0.93-1.00), respectively. Conclusion F-18-PSMA-1007 PET/CT showed significantly greater sensitivity in nodal staging of primary PCa than did WBMRI with DWI or CT, while maintaining high specificity.Peer reviewe

    11C-acetate PET/MRI in bladder cancer staging and treatment response evaluation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy : a prospective multicenter study (ACEBIB trial)

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background To evaluate the accuracy of 11C-acetate Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) in bladder cancer (BC) staging and monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods Eighteen patients were prospectively enrolled. Fifteen treatment naive patients underwent 11C-acetate PET/MRI before transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT) for primary tumor evaluation. Five patients with muscle invasive BC were imaged after NAC and prior to radical cystectomy (RC) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for NAC treatment response evaluation. Two patients were part of both cohorts. 11C-acetate PET/MRI findings were correlated with histopathology. Accuracy for lymph node detection was evaluated on patient and the ePLND template (10 regions) levels. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 11C-acetate PET/MRI for the detection of muscle invasive BC was 1.00, 0.69 and 0.73 while the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) was 0.85 (0.55–1.0), respectively. All five NAC patients underwent chemotherapy as planned and 11C-acetate PET/MRI correctly staged three patients, overstaged one and understaged one patient compared with RC and ePLND findings. A total of 175 lymph node were removed, median of 35 (range, 27–43) per patient in five patients who had RC and ePLND while 12 (7%) harboured metastases. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC for N-staging were 0.20, 0.96, 0.80 and 0.58 on the ePLND template (10 regions) level. Conclusions 11C-acetate PET/MRI is feasible for staging of BC although sensitivity for the detection of nodal metastases is low. Monitoring response to NAC shows promise and warrants evaluation in larger studies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01918592 , registered August 8 201
    • …
    corecore