Effect of late sodium current inhibition on MRI measured diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Ranolazine is a new anti-anginal drug that acts via late sodium current inhibition, and has been shown to improve diastolic dysfunction in isolated myocytes. Diastolic dysfuntion is common in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), and precedes symptom development and systolic dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of ranolazine on peak early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) and exercise capacity in patients with AS. METHODS: Patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe AS and diastolic dysfunction underwent trans-thoracic echocardiography, exercise testing and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at baseline, 6 weeks after commencing ranolazine and at 10 weeks (4 weeks after discontinuation). Diastolic function was assessed using PEDSR measured on tagged CMR images. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (peak pressure gradient 48.8 ± 12.4 mmHg, mean pressure gradient 27.1 ± 7.5 mmHg, aortic valve area 1.26 ± 0.31 cm(2)) completed the week-6 visit and 13 completed the final visit. Global PEDSR did not significantly increase from baseline (0.79 ± 0.15) to week-6 (0.86 ± 0.18, p = 0.198). There was a borderline significant increase in total exercise duration from 10.47 ± 3.68 min to 11.60 ± 3.25 min (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This small pilot study did not show a significant improvement in diastolic function with the use of ranolazine in asymptomatic patients with moderate-severe AS. Further studies with a larger population may be indicated. EduraCT number 2011-000111-26

Prevalence and extent of infarct and microvascular obstruction following different reperfusion therapies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Background: Microvascular obstruction (MVO) describes suboptimal tissue perfusion despite restoration of infarct-related artery flow. There are scarce data on Infarct Size (IS) and MVO in relation to the mode and timing of reperfusion. We sought to characterise the prevalence and extent of microvascular injury and IS using Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in relation to the mode of reperfusion following acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). Methods: CMR infarct characteristics were measured in 94 STEMI patients (age 61.0 ± 13.1 years) at 1.5 T. Seventy-three received reperfusion therapy: primary percutaneous coronary-intervention (PPCI, n = 47); thrombolysis (n = 12); rescue PCI (R-PCI, n = 8), late PCI (n = 6). Twenty-one patients presented late (>12 hours) and did not receive reperfusion therapy. Results: IS was smaller in PPCI (19.8 ± 13.2% of LV mass) and thrombolysis (15.2 ± 10.1%) groups compared to patients in the late PCI (40.0 ± 15.6%) and R-PCI (34.2 ± 18.9%) groups, p <0.001. The prevalence of MVO was similar across all groups and was seen at least as frequently in the non-reperfused group (15/21, [76%] v 33/59, [56%], p = 0.21) and to a similar magnitude (1.3 (0.0-2.8) v 0.4 [0.0-2.9]% LV mass, p = 0.36) compared to patients receiving early reperfusion therapy. In the 73 reperfused patients, time to reperfusion, ischaemia area at risk and TIMI grade post-PCI were the strongest independent predictors of IS and MVO. Conclusions: In patients with acute STEMI, CMR-measured MVO is not exclusive to reperfusion therapy and is primarily related to ischaemic time. This finding has important implications for clinical trials that use CMR to assess the efficacy of therapies to reduce reperfusion injury in STEMI

Comparison of semi-automated methods to quantify infarct size and area at risk by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths.

Background: There is currently no gold standard technique for quantifying infarct size (IS) and ischaemic area-at-risk (AAR [oedema]) on late gadolinium enhancement imaging (LGE) and T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery imaging (T2w-STIR) respectively. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of IS and AAR quantification on LGE and T2w-STIR imaging using Otsu’s Automated Technique (OAT) with currently used methods at 1.5T and 3.0T post acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Ten patients were assessed at 1.5T and 10 at 3.0T. IS was assessed on LGE using 5–8 standard-deviation thresholding (5-8SD), full-width half-maximum (FWHM) quantification and OAT. AAR was assessed on T2w-STIR using 2SD and OAT. Accuracy was assessed by comparison with manual quantification. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis. IS using each technique was correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: FWHM and 8SD-derived IS closely correlated with manual assessment at both field strengths (1.5T: 18.3 ± 10.7% LV Mass [LVM] with FWHM, 17.7 ± 14.4% LVM with 8SD, 16.5 ± 10.3% LVM with manual quantification; 3.0T: 10.8 ± 8.2% LVM with FWHM, 11.4 ± 9.0% LVM with 8SD, 11.5 ± 9.0% LVM with manual quantification). 5SD and OAT overestimated IS at both field strengths. OAT, 2SD and manually quantified AAR closely correlated at 1.5T, but OAT overestimated AAR compared with manual assessment at 3.0T. IS and AAR derived by FWHM and OAT respectively had better reproducibility compared with manual and SD-based quantification. FWHM IS correlated strongest with LVEF. Conclusions: FWHM quantification of IS is accurate, reproducible and correlates strongly with LVEF, whereas 5SD and OAT overestimate IS. OAT accurately assesses AAR at 1.5T and with excellent reproducibility. OAT overestimated AAR at 3.0T and thus cannot be recommended as the preferred method for AAR quantification at 3.0T

Comparison of global myocardial strain assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging and feature tracking to infarct size at predicting remodelling following STEMI.

BACKGROUND: To determine if global strain parameters measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) acutely following ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) predict adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling independent of infarct size (IS). METHODS: Sixty-five patients with acute STEMI (mean age 60 ± 11 years) underwent CMR at 1-3 days post-reperfusion (baseline) and at 4 months. Global peak systolic circumferential strain (GCS), measured by tagging and Feature Tracking (FT), and global peak systolic longitudinal strain (GLS), measured by FT, were calculated at baseline, along with IS. On follow up scans, volumetric analysis was performed to determine the development of adverse remodelling - a composite score based on development of either end-diastolic volume index [EDVI] ≥20% or end-systolic volume index [ESVI] ≥15% at follow-up compared to baseline. RESULTS: The magnitude of GCS was higher when measured using FT (-21.1 ± 6.3%) than with tagging (-12.1 ± 4.3; p < 0.001 for difference). There was good correlation of strain with baseline LVEF (r 0.64-to 0.71) and IS (ρ -0.62 to-0.72). Baseline strain parameters were unable to predict development of adverse LV remodelling. Only baseline IS predicted adverse remodelling - Odds Ratio 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.10, p = 0.03), area under the ROC curve 0.70 (95% CI 0.52-0.87, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Baseline global strain by CMR does not predict the development of adverse LV remodelling following STEMI

The REFLO-STEMI (REperfusion Facilitated by LOcal adjunctive therapy in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial: a randomised controlled trial comparing intracoronary administration of adenosine or sodium nitroprusside with control for attenuation of microvascular obstruction during primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Microvascular obstruction (MVO) predicts short- and longer-term outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The evidence base supporting the role of adenosine and sodium nitroprusside (SNP), the most evaluated adjunctive therapies aimed at attenuating MVO and infarct size, remains weak as the trials involved have had variable end points and used differing drug doses and modes of delivery.To determine whether intracoronary administration of adenosine or SNP following thrombus aspiration reduces infarct size and/or MVO measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients undergoing PPCI within 6 hours of onset of STEMI.Multicentre, prospective, parallel, randomised controlled and open-label trial with blinded end point analysis.Four high-volume UK PPCI centres.Patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 in the infarct-related artery and no significant bystander coronary artery disease on angiography.Participants were anticoagulated with bivalirudin and allocated by an automated 24-hour telephone randomisation service to one of three groups: (1) standard PPCI (control), (2) PPCI with adjunctive adenosine 1–2 mg or (3) PPCI with adjunctive SNP 250 µg. The study drugs were delivered intracoronary immediately following thrombus aspiration and again following successful stenting.The primary outcome was infarct size (% total left ventricular end-diastolic mass; %LVM) measured by CMR imaging undertaken 48–96 hours post PPCI. Secondary outcome measures included MVO (hypoenhancement within the infarct core) on CMR imaging, electrocardiographic and angiographic markers of microvascular perfusion and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during a median of 6 months’ follow-up. The study aimed to recruit 240 patients (powered at 80% to detect a 5% absolute reduction in infarct size).The trial completed recruitment in April 2014 having randomised 247 patients (standard PPCI group, n = 86; PPCI + adenosine group, n = 82; PPCI + SNP group, n = 79). In total, 79% of participants were male and the mean ± standard deviation age of participants was 59.3 ± 12.3 years. CMR imaging was completed in 197 (80%) patients (standard PPCI, n = 65; PPCI + adenosine, n = 63; PPCI + SNP, n = 69) for the primary outcome. There was no significant difference in infarct size [%LVM, median, interquartile range (IQR)] between the adenosine group (10.1, 4.7–16.2), the SNP group (10.0, 4.2–15.8) and the control group (8.3, 1.9–14.0) (p = 0.062 and p = 0.160 vs. control, respectively). MVO (%LVM, median, IQR) was similar across the groups [1.0, 0.0–3.7 (p = 0.205) and 0.6, 0.0–2.4 (p = 0.244) for adenosine and SNP, respectively, vs. 0.3, 0.0–2.8 for the control]. Using per-protocol analysis, infarct size (%LVM) was increased in adenosine-treated patients compared with control patients (12.0 vs. 8.3; p = 0.031). Increased left ventricular volume and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were also observed in the adenosine arm. There was a significant increase in MACEs in patients undergoing adenosine-facilitated PPCI compared with control patients, driven by heart failure, at 30 days [hazard ratio (HR) 5.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 24.60; p = 0.04] and 6 months (HR 6.53, 95% CI 1.46 to 29.2; p = 0.01) post randomisation.High-dose intracoronary adenosine and SNP during PPCI did not reduce infarct size or MVO measured by CMR imaging. Furthermore, adenosine may adversely affect mid-term clinical outcome and should not be used during PPCI to prevent reperfusion injury.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01747174 and EudraCT 2010–023211–34.This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme, a MRC and NIHR partnership