10 research outputs found

    Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

    Get PDF
    Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection

    Association between the DRD2-141C Insertion/Deletion polymorphism and schizophrenia Associação entre o polimorfismo -141C Ins/Del do gene do DRD2 e esquizofrenia

    No full text
    Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the genetic component is an important risk factor for the development of schizophrenia. The genes that codify the different compounds of the dopaminergic system have created interest for molecular investigations in patients with schizophrenia because the antipsychotic drugs, especially those of first generation, act on this cerebral system. Thus the aim of the present study was to investigate the possible association between the -141 Ins/Del (rs1799732) polymorphism of the dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD2) and schizophrenia. The distribution of the alleles and genotypes of the studied polymorphism was investigated in a sample of 229 patients and 733 controls. There were statistical differences in the allelic (&#967;2=9.78; p=0.001) and genotypic genotypic (&#967;2=12.74; p=0.001) distributions between patients and controls. Thus the -141C Ins/Del polymorphism of the DRD2 gene (allele Ins) was associated to the SCZ phenotype in the investigated sample.Estudos epidemiológicos têm demonstrado que o componente genético é um importante fator de risco para o desenvolvimento de esquizofrenia. Os genes que codificam os diferentes componentes do sistema dopaminérgico passaram a despertar interesse para os estudos moleculares em pacientes com esquizofrenia, devido ao fato dos antipsicóticos, em especial os de primeira geração, exercerem sua ação nesse sistema. Assim, o objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a possível associação entre polimorfismo -141C Ins/Del (rs1799732) do gene do receptor dopaminérgico tipo 2 (DRD2) e esquizofrenia. Um total de 229 pacientes e 733 controles pareados para sexo e idade foi selecionado com o objetivo de investigar a distribuição dos alelos e genótipos do polimorfismo investigado entre os grupos de pacientes e controles. Houve diferença estatisticamente significante nas distribuições alélica (&#967;2=9,78; p=0,001) e genotípica (&#967;2=12,74; p=0,001) entre pacientes e controles. Assim, o polimorfismo -141C Ins/Del do gene do DRD2 (alelo Ins) está associado à esquizofrenia na amostra estudada

    Association between the SLC6A3 A1343G polymorphism and schizophrenia Associação entre o polimorfismo A1343G do SLC6A3 e esquizofrenia

    Get PDF
    Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the genetic component is an important risk factor for the development of schizophrenia. The genes that codify the different compounds of the dopaminergic system have created interest for molecular investigations in patients with schizophrenia because the antipsychotic drugs, especially those of first generation, act on this cerebral system. Thus the aim of the present study was to investigate the possible association between a new single nucleotide polymorphism (rs6347) located in exon 9 of the protein transporter (SLC6A3) and schizophrenia. The distribution of the alleles and genotypes of the studied polymorphism was investigated in a sample of 235 patients and 834 controls matched by gender and age. There were statistical differences in the allelic (&#967;2=5.97, 1d.f. , p=0.01, OR=1.33-1.05<OR<1.69) and genotypic (&#967;2=6.56, 2d.f. , p=0.03) distributions between patients and controls. Thus the SLC6A3 A1343G polymorphism was associated to the SCZ phenotype in the investigated sample.<br>Estudos epidemiológicos têm demonstrado que o componente genético é um importante fator de risco para a esquizofrenia. Os genes que codificam os diferentes componentes do sistema dopaminérgico passaram a despertar interesse para estudos moleculares em pacientes com esquizofrenia, pois os antipsicóticos, em especial os de primeira geração, exercem sua ação nesse sistema. Assim, o objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar a associação entre um novo polimorfismo de nucleotídeo único (rs6347) localizado no exon 9 do gene do transportador de dopamina (SLC6A3) e esquizofrenia. Um total de 235 pacientes e 834 controles pareados para sexo e idade foi selecionado para a investigação da distribuição dos alelos e genótipos do polimorfismo investigado entre os grupos de pacientes e controles. Houve diferenças estatisticamente significantes nas distribuições alélicas (&#967;2=5,97, 1d.f. , p=0,01, OR=1,33-1,05<OR<1,69) e genotípicas (&#967;2=6,56, 2d.f. , p=0,03) entre pacientes e controles. Assim, o polimorfismo SLC6A3 A1343G mostrou associação com esquizofrenia na amostra estudada

    2nd Meeting for Accessibility and Inclusion in Art and Heritage : book proceedings

    Get PDF
    Obra publicada por ocasião do Segundo Encontro de Acessibilidade e Inclusão na Arte e no Património, decorrido nos dias 24 e 25 de junho de 2022 Resumo2ª edição do encontro Acessibilidade e Inclusão na Arte e no Património é uma iniciativa da Faculdade de Belas-Artes da Universidade de Lisboa e do Museu da Farmácia. Tem como objetivo ser um espaço de discussão e troca de ideias, reunindo trabalhos associados à acessibilidade à arte e ao património cultural. Divulgando estratégias que visam melhorar o acesso e a inclusão dos diversos públicos, nomeadamente de públicos com deficiência, ao património. Este livro de atas reúne nove artigos. São abordados temas associados à teoria e legislação sobre acessibilidade e inclusão no património; avaliação da acessibilidade nos museus; experiências multissensoriais em museus e monumentos e ainda o desenvolvimento de produtos que promovam acessibilidade em museus. O Encontro contou com a participação de investigadores e profissionais da área provenientes de várias instituições nacionais e internacionaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Reduction of cardiac imaging tests during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Italy. Findings from the IAEA Non-invasive Cardiology Protocol Survey on COVID-19 (INCAPS COVID)

    No full text
    Background: In early 2020, COVID-19 massively hit Italy, earlier and harder than any other European country. This caused a series of strict containment measures, aimed at blocking the spread of the pandemic. Healthcare delivery was also affected when resources were diverted towards care of COVID-19 patients, including intensive care wards. Aim of the study: The aim is assessing the impact of COVID-19 on cardiac imaging in Italy, compare to the Rest of Europe (RoE) and the World (RoW). Methods: A global survey was conducted in May–June 2020 worldwide, through a questionnaire distributed online. The survey covered three periods: March and April 2020, and March 2019. Data from 52 Italian centres, a subset of the 909 participating centres from 108 countries, were analyzed. Results: In Italy, volumes decreased by 67% in March 2020, compared to March 2019, as opposed to a significantly lower decrease (p &lt; 0.001) in RoE and RoW (41% and 40%, respectively). A further decrease from March 2020 to April 2020 summed up to 76% for the North, 77% for the Centre and 86% for the South. When compared to the RoE and RoW, this further decrease from March 2020 to April 2020 in Italy was significantly less (p = 0.005), most likely reflecting the earlier effects of the containment measures in Italy, taken earlier than anywhere else in the West. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic massively hit Italy and caused a disruption of healthcare services, including cardiac imaging studies. This raises concern about the medium- and long-term consequences for the high number of patients who were denied timely diagnoses and the subsequent lifesaving therapies and procedures

    International Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis of Heart Disease

    No full text
    Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has adversely affected diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases. Its effects on delivery of diagnostic care for cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of death worldwide, have not been quantified. Objectives: The study sought to assess COVID-19's impact on global cardiovascular diagnostic procedural volumes and safety practices. Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey assessing alterations in cardiovascular procedure volumes and safety practices resulting from COVID-19. Noninvasive and invasive cardiac testing volumes were obtained from participating sites for March and April 2020 and compared with those from March 2019. Availability of personal protective equipment and pandemic-related testing practice changes were ascertained. Results: Surveys were submitted from 909 inpatient and outpatient centers performing cardiac diagnostic procedures, in 108 countries. Procedure volumes decreased 42% from March 2019 to March 2020, and 64% from March 2019 to April 2020. Transthoracic echocardiography decreased by 59%, transesophageal echocardiography 76%, and stress tests 78%, which varied between stress modalities. Coronary angiography (invasive or computed tomography) decreased 55% (p &lt; 0.001 for each procedure). In multivariable regression, significantly greater reduction in procedures occurred for centers in countries with lower gross domestic product. Location in a low-income and lower–middle-income country was associated with an additional 22% reduction in cardiac procedures and less availability of personal protective equipment and telehealth. Conclusions: COVID-19 was associated with a significant and abrupt reduction in cardiovascular diagnostic testing across the globe, especially affecting the world's economically challenged. Further study of cardiovascular outcomes and COVID-19–related changes in care delivery is warranted

    Impact of COVID-19 on Diagnostic Cardiac Procedural Volume in Oceania: The IAEA Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocol Survey on COVID-19 (INCAPS COVID)

    No full text
    Objectives: The INCAPS COVID Oceania study aimed to assess the impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac procedure volume provided in the Oceania region. Methods: A retrospective survey was performed comparing procedure volumes within March 2019 (pre-COVID-19) with April 2020 (during first wave of COVID-19 pandemic). Sixty-three (63) health care facilities within Oceania that perform cardiac diagnostic procedures were surveyed, including a mixture of metropolitan and regional, hospital and outpatient, public and private sites, and 846 facilities outside of Oceania. The percentage change in procedure volume was measured between March 2019 and April 2020, compared by test type and by facility. Results: In Oceania, the total cardiac diagnostic procedure volume was reduced by 52.2% from March 2019 to April 2020, compared to a reduction of 75.9% seen in the rest of the world (p&lt;0.001). Within Oceania sites, this reduction varied significantly between procedure types, but not between types of health care facility. All procedure types (other than stress cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR] and positron emission tomography [PET]) saw significant reductions in volume over this time period (p&lt;0.001). In Oceania, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) decreased by 51.6%, transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) by 74.0%, and stress tests by 65% overall, which was more pronounced for stress electrocardiograph (ECG) (81.8%) and stress echocardiography (76.7%) compared to stress single-photon emission computerised tomography (SPECT) (44.3%). Invasive coronary angiography decreased by 36.7% in Oceania. Conclusion: A significant reduction in cardiac diagnostic procedure volume was seen across all facility types in Oceania and was likely a function of recommendations from cardiac societies and directives from government to minimise spread of COVID-19 amongst patients and staff. Longer term evaluation is important to assess for negative patient outcomes which may relate to deferral of usual models of care within cardiology
    corecore