26 research outputs found

    Real World Learning and Authentic Assessment

    Get PDF
    As students increasingly adopt a consumerist lifestyle academics are under pressure to assess and mark more students’ assignments in quicker turn around periods. In no other area is the marketisation shift between student and academic more apparent in the accountability that academics now need to demonstrate to students in their grading and feedback (Boud & Molloy, 2013). When evaluating their higher education experience students are most likely to complain about their grading or feedback (Boud & Molloy, 2013) and National Student Survey results consistently indicate that this category, more than any other, has the highest student dissatisfaction rates (Race, 2014)

    The effects of performance-based assessment criteria on student performance and self-assessment skills

    Get PDF
    This study investigated the effect of performance-based versus competence-based assessment criteria on task performance and self-assessment skills among 39 novice secondary vocational education students in the domain of nursing and care. In a performance-based assessment group students are provided with a preset list of performance-based assessment criteria, describing what students should do, for the task at hand. The performance-based group is compared to a competence-based assessment group in which students receive a preset list of competence-based assessment criteria, describing what students should be able to do. The test phase revealed that the performance-based group outperformed the competence-based group on test task performance. In addition, higher performance of the performance-based group was reached with lower reported mental effort during training, indicating a higher instructional efficiency for novice students

    In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments

    Get PDF

    Does self-evaluation of CAP quality lead to improvements in assessment and curriculum

    No full text
    Technological developments and computerisation influence many jobs. The goal of this study is to identify to what extent employees need an increased and/or different understanding of science and technology to function in their jobs than is currently taught in schools. Whereas previous research tended to focus on very general skills (e.g., problem solving, communication) or long detailed lists of content knowledge, the focus of this study is on competences such as modelling and visualising. Companies most influenced by technological developments were selected in cooperation with National Centres of Expertise on vocational education. They were asked in which companies (1) more and/or different scientific and technological competences, and (2) creativity and flexibility are required. We focused on jobs at the level of senior secondary vocational education, as these jobs are most prone to being outsourced or taken over by computers. Employees working in the different companies were asked what knowledge and skills they use during their work, for example when working with machines and computers. Preliminary results show the influence of technological developments on almost all jobs. Required knowledge and skills are for example: data-analysis, the use of graphs and thinking beyond one's own job. The need for flexibility, creativity and insight in ‘black boxes' seems to depend on the level of education. Theory and aimsThe increased use of information- and communication technology and the influence of scientific and technological developments have caused many countries to redefine the key competences for adequately functioning professionals. This study specifically focuses on the needs of future employees: what competences in the domains of science and technology do they need to function adequately in their jobs, now and the future?Previous studies tend to focus on very general skills such as problem solving and communication (e.g., Holbrook & Rannikmae, 2007), which do not provide any specification of what should be taught. Other studies provide long and detailed lists of content to be taught in schools (e.g., AAAS, 1993). These lists run the risk of quickly becoming outdated as the amount of technical information is doubling every two years (Binkley et al., 2010). This begs the question whether we can identify competences that are general in the sense that we may expect them to stay valuable for a long time, but at the same time not too general to offer directions for curricula. This study tries to answer this question by interviewing employees in companies that are subject to technological developments. In the literature, two domains provide input to this study. First, a number of studies focus on 21st century-skills, lifelong learning competences, or key skills. For example, Binkley et al. (2010) analysed curriculum and assessment frameworks around the world, and identified ten competences, including creativity, critical thinking and ICT literacy. Voogt and Pareja-Roblin (2010) and Dede (2009) reviewed different reports about 21st century skills, generally relying on private/business initiatives. These reports mention skills such as communication, ICT literacy, social awareness, and creativity. Problematic is, however, that explicit links to educational levels are missing and the educational community hardly participates in this debate. These reports thus provide little direction with regard to the content of education. Second, we reviewed the literature about knowledge and skills used in the workplace. Here, hardly any studies exist on the use of science and technology at the workplace. There are, however, studies on mathematics that are general enough to be useful for science and technology as well (e.g., Bakker et al., 2006; Pozzi et al., 1998). These studies show the importance of: (1) knowing what processes are ‘hidden' in computers or machines, and (2) analysing relationships between variables, based on quantitative data. Data and MethodsParticipantsThe context of this study was vocational education in the Netherlands, preparing students for a job at levels ranging from assistant worker to middle management. This middle-level job was chosen, as it is likely to be most affected by technological changes, while employees are not specifically educated in this domain (Levi & Murnane, 2005). To identify companies most influenced by technological developments, interviews were conducted with National Centres of Expertise, who develop national qualification profiles for the different branches. Six interviews were conducted with representatives from: animal and plant care, car mechanics, audician/optician, graphical design, commercials/presentation, and nursing/care. Seven interviews were conducted with employees of these branches: a farmer using robots, employees of Ford cards, a company developing logistical systems, an ICT desk, an outsourcing company, and an audician. In November/December 2010, more interviews will be conducted in different branches, and nursing specifically. InterviewsRepresentatives of the branches were asked to describe developments with regard to: (1) the amount of science and technology, (2) the content of science and technology, and (3) flexibility and creativity needed to function on the job. Depending on their function, the employees were asked:- what kind of machines and computer programs they work with;- if they need to know the ‘invisible processes' inside;- how they are trained to work with new machines and computers;- what they do in case of an unexpected outcome or problem.All participants were asked to describe job situations in which scientific and technological knowledge and skills are used. Preliminary resultsFull results, including the remaining interviews and more examples from concrete job situations, are presented at the conference.- Required knowledge and skills: most employees need some basic knowledge of science and technology. For example, audicians need knowledge of the auditory organs.- Flexibility and creativity: at lower levels, employees are not expected to suggest improvements or solve non-standard problems. An exception is ‘defence/tank' mechanics. They need to know the exact working of tank engines, enabling creativity in emergencies.- Insight in black boxes: opinions seem to differ here. In general, employees can work with machines without knowing ‘what is going on inside'. For example, graphical designer can use software to make sketches without knowing how colours mix. Theoretical and educational significance. Most jobs seem to be influenced by computerisation and technology, leading to changed requirements in terms of knowledge and skills, creativity and insight in black boxes. The identification of these changed requirements could guide curriculum adaptations, better preparing young people for their future jobs. More research seems warranted on the use of science and technology at the workplace (following studies on mathematics). This study is a first step in this direction

    Assessment in Dutch vocational education: Overview and tensions of the past 15 years

    No full text
    This chapter describes the developments in the area of assessment in vocational education in the Netherlands over the past 15 years. In: Bruijn, E., Billett, S., & Onstenk, J. (Eds.). (2017). Enhancing teaching and learning in the Dutch vocational education system : Reforms enacted (Professional and practice-based learning, volume 18). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50734-

    Assessment in Dutch vocational education: Overview and tensions of the past 15 years

    No full text
    This chapter describes the developments in assessment practices in Dutch Vocational Education and Training (VET) in the past 15 years. Two developments have been particularly influential: (i) continuous changes in the national qualification structure describing the end goals of VET trajectories, and (ii) changes in the system of quality assurance of VET assessments. The goal of this chapter is to describe how VET institutions (re)developed their assessment practices to address these changes, through a combination of addressing changing policy and scientific research. Five tensions were identified that characterise the struggle around VET assessments: (1) new goals require new assessment methods, (2) assessment as a one-shot measurement versus a coherent programme appraisal, (3) the increased involvement of the labour market in VET, (4) securing a balance between governmental control and VET institutions’ responsibility in developing and quality assuring assessments, and (5) realising the balance between the formative and summative functions of assessment. The chapter concludes with the presentation of the Process Architecture Assessment, which is advanced as representing the state-of-the art in VET assessments. In the Process Architecture, the entire assessment process is described including the responsibilities of the different stakeholders
    corecore