103 research outputs found

    Educational paper: Abusive Head Trauma Part I. Clinical aspects

    Get PDF
    Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) refers to the combination of findings formerly described as shaken baby syndrome. Although these findings can be caused by shaking, it has become clear that in many cases there may have been impact trauma as well. Therefore a less specific term has been adopted by the American Academy of Pediatrics. AHT is a relatively common cause of childhood neurotrauma with an estimated incidence of 14–40 cases per 100,000 children under the age of 1 year. About 15–23% of these children die within hours or days after the incident. Studies among AHT survivors demonstrate that approximately one-third of the children are severely disabled, one-third of them are moderately disabled and one-third have no or only mild symptoms. Other publications suggest that neurological problems can occur after a symptom-free interval and that half of these children have IQs below the 10th percentile. Clinical findings are depending on the definitions used, but AHT should be considered in all children with neurological signs and symptoms especially if no or only mild trauma is described. Subdural haematomas are the most reported finding. The only feature that has been identified discriminating AHT from accidental injury is apnoea. Conclusion: AHT should be approached with a structured approach, as in any other (potentially lethal) disease. The clinician can only establish this diagnosis if he/she has knowledge of the signs and symptoms of AHT, risk factors, the differential diagnosis and which additional investigations to perform, the more so since parents seldom will describe the true state of affairs spontaneously

    Pain relief in labour: a qualitative study to determine how to support women to make decisions about pain relief in labour

    Get PDF
    Background Engagement in decision making is a key priority of modern healthcare. Women are encouraged to make decisions about pain relief in labour in the ante-natal period based upon their expectations of what labour pain will be like. Many women find this planning difficult. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how women can be better supported in preparing for, and making, decisions during pregnancy and labour regarding pain management. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 primiparous and 10 multiparous women at 36 weeks of pregnancy and again within six weeks postnatally. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently to identify key themes. Results Three main themes emerged from the data. Firstly, during pregnancy women expressed a degree of uncertainty about the level of pain they would experience in labour and the effect of different methods of pain relief. Secondly, women reflected on how decisions had been made regarding pain management in labour and the degree to which they had felt comfortable making these decisions. Finally, women discussed their perceived levels of control, both desired and experienced, over both their bodies and the decisions they were making. Conclusion This study suggests that the current approach of antenatal preparation in the NHS, of asking women to make decisions antenatally for pain relief in labour, needs reviewing. It would be more beneficial to concentrate efforts on better informing women and on engaging them in discussions around their values, expectations and preferences and how these affect each specific choice rather than expecting them to make to make firm decisions in advance of such an unpredictable event as labour

    The growth of a culture of evidence-based obstetrics in South Africa: a qualitative case study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>While the past two decades have seen a shift towards evidence-based obstetrics and midwifery, the process through which a culture of evidence-based practice develops and is sustained within particular fields of clinical practice has not been well documented, particularly in LMICs (low- and middle-income countries). Forming part of a broader qualitative study of evidence-based policy making, this paper describes the development of a culture of evidence-based practice amongst maternal health policy makers and senior academic obstetricians in South Africa</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A qualitative case-study approach was used. This included a literature review, a policy document review, a timeline of key events and the collection and analysis of 15 interviews with policy makers and academic clinicians involved in these policy processes and sampled using a purposive approach. The data was analysed thematically.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The concept of evidence-based medicine became embedded in South African academic obstetrics at a very early stage in relation to the development of the concept internationally. The diffusion of this concept into local academic obstetrics was facilitated by contact and exchange between local academic obstetricians, opinion leaders in international research and structures promoting evidence-based practice. Furthermore the growing acceptance of the concept was stimulated locally through the use of existing professional networks and meetings to share ideas and the contribution of local researchers to building the evidence base for obstetrics both locally and internationally. As a testimony to the extent of the diffusion of evidence-based medicine, South Africa has strongly evidence-based policies for maternal health.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This case study shows that the combined efforts of local and international researchers can create a culture of evidence-based medicine within one country. It also shows that doing so required time and perseverance from international researchers combined with a readiness by local researchers to receive and actively promote the practice.</p

    Resultados maternos e neonatais em centro de parto normal peri-hospitalar e hospital

    Get PDF
    OBJETIVO: Comparar os resultados maternos e neonatais em mulheres de baixo risco atendidas em centro de parto normal peri-hospitalar e hospital. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com amostra representativa de mulheres de baixo risco atendidas em SĂŁo Paulo, SP, de 2003 a 2006. Foram incluĂ­das 991 mulheres que tiveram o parto no centro de parto normal e 325 que deram Ă  luz no hospital. Os dados foram obtidos dos prontuĂĄrios. A anĂĄlise comparativa foi realizada para o total de mulheres e estratificada segundo a paridade. Foram aplicados os testes qui-quadrado e exato de Fisher. RESULTADOS: Houve distribuição homogĂȘnea das mulheres segundo a paridade (45,4% nulĂ­paras e 54,6% mulheres com um ou mais partos anteriores). Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significantes em relação Ă s seguintes intervençÔes: amniotomia (mais freqĂŒente entre nulĂ­paras do hospital); utilização de ocitocina no trabalho de parto e utilização de analgĂ©sico no pĂłs-parto (mais freqĂŒentes no hospital entre as mulheres de todas as paridades). A taxa de episiotomia foi maior entre as nulĂ­paras, tanto no centro de parto como no hospital. Houve maior freqĂŒĂȘncia de intervençÔes com o neonato no hospital: aspiração das vias aĂ©reas superiores, aspiração gĂĄstrica, lavagem gĂĄstrica, oxigĂȘnio por mĂĄscara aberta. TambĂ©m ocorreram com mais freqĂŒĂȘncia no hospital bossa serossanguĂ­nea, desconforto respiratĂłrio e internação na unidade neonatal. NĂŁo houve diferença nos valores de Apgar no quinto minuto nem casos de morte materna ou perinatal. CONCLUSÕES: A assistĂȘncia no centro de parto normal foi realizada com menos intervençÔes e com resultados maternos e neonatais semelhantes aos do hospital

    Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesis

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 97840.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
    • 

    corecore