The prevalence of anxiety and depression in people with age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review of observational study data

Background Comorbid mental health problems have been shown to have an adverse effect on the quality of life of people with common eye disorders. This study aims to assess whether symptoms of anxiety and/or depression are more prevalent in people with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) than in people without this condition. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO) from inception to February 2012 was conducted to identify studies of AMD populations which measured symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Reference checking of relevant articles was also performed. Data on the study setting, prevalence and how anxiety and depression were measured were extracted from the papers. Critical appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools. Results A total of 16 papers were included in the review, from an original search result of 597. The prevalence estimates, taken from nine cross-sectional and cohort studies, ranged from 15.7%-44% for depressive symptoms and 9.6%-30.1% for anxiety symptoms in people with AMD. The seven case–control studies found that people with AMD were more likely to experience symptoms of depression compared with those without AMD, but not more likely to experience symptoms of anxiety. Conclusions Overall, the evidence suggests that symptoms of depression are more prevalent amongst AMD populations than anxiety symptoms. The heterogeneity of the studies included in this review means that it is difficult to draw strong conclusions as to the true estimates of depression and anxiety symptoms in AMD populations and prevented formal meta-analysis. Further research which specifies clinical anxiety and gives clear definitions as to the type of AMD being investigated is required

Influences and hegemonies in health reform research

Analizamos la evolución de las publicaciones, incluidas en MEDLINE, LILACS y Sociological Abstracts, sobre las Reformas de Salud en el mundo y las influencias que determinan su orientación y distribución en el período de 1990-2004. En total se seleccionaron 8.729 publicaciones. Los principios de “Sostenibilidad” y “Calidad y Efectividad” son los más atendidos, existiendo distintos patrones de atención, dependiendo de regiones y países. De 199 países, el 61% tiene referencia sobre sus procesos de reforma, siendo Estados Unidos y Gran Bretaña los que agrupan la mayor cantidad. Se observó que existen fuertes influencias para el estudio de las Reformas de Salud, provenientes de los patrones Británico y Norteamericano de atención a los Principios de Reforma. Esto puede estar limitando la visibilidad científica de cuestiones como la equidad, participación y eficiencia.The authors analyze the evolution in publications indexed in MEDLINE, LILACS, and Sociological Abstracts concerning health reforms around the world and the determinants of their orientation and distribution from 1990 to 2004. A total of 8,729 publications were selected. The principles of “sustainability” and “quality and effectiveness” were dealt with most frequently, with different patterns of attention, depending on the regions and countries. Of 199 countries, 61% included references as to their health reform processes, with the largest numbers in the United States and the Great Britain. The British and U.S. standards for attention to health reform principles displayed strong influences on the study of health reforms elsewhere. This may limit the scientific visibility of issues like equity, participation, and efficiency