43 research outputs found
“I Wouldn’t Want to Be a Gender Expert:” Gender Experts in Peace Mediation
Peace mediation is a professional practice that is increasingly reliant on thematic technical experts, including gender experts. The strategy of including gender expertise in peace mediation reflects the Women, Peace and Security agenda and the call to include dedicated gender expertise in all peacemaking efforts. Based on interviews with peace mediation practitioners, the article analyzes the role of gender experts in peace mediation. We argue that there is a tension between the art of mediation and the art of gender expertise that reflects the gendered power dynamics of peace mediation. We conclude that the strategy of appointing gender experts to peace mediation teams will not “dismantle the master’s house.” However, we acknowledge that without a gender expert very little will be accomplished on this issue. For peace mediation to address the gendered foundations of conflict we argue for the development of an alternate feminist peace mediation practice
Modeling Errors in Daily Precipitation Measurements: Additive or Multiplicative?
The definition and quantification of uncertainty depend on the error model used. For uncertainties in precipitation measurements, two types of error models have been widely adopted: the additive error model and the multiplicative error model. This leads to incompatible specifications of uncertainties and impedes intercomparison and application.In this letter, we assess the suitability of both models for satellite-based daily precipitation measurements in an effort to clarify the uncertainty representation. Three criteria were employed to evaluate the applicability of either model: (1) better separation of the systematic and random errors; (2) applicability to the large range of variability in daily precipitation; and (3) better predictive skills. It is found that the multiplicative error model is a much better choice under all three criteria. It extracted the systematic errors more cleanly, was more consistent with the large variability of precipitation measurements, and produced superior predictions of the error characteristics. The additive error model had several weaknesses, such as non constant variance resulting from systematic errors leaking into random errors, and the lack of prediction capability. Therefore, the multiplicative error model is a better choice
The seventh national communication of Malta under the United Nations framework convention on climate change
This is the fourth time that Malta is submitting a National Communication under the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), following the submission of a First National
Communication in 2004 and a Second National Communication in 2010. This is also the second
time that Malta is submitting such a Communication since its accession to Annex I status under
the Convention, the first two submissions having been made as a non-Annex I Party.
Emission reduction or limitation commitments applicable to Malta
Malta’s status under the Convention up to the time it applied for accession to Annex I, and with
that accession being conditional to not taking on quantified emission limitation or reduction
targets for the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, meant that until 2012 Malta was not
subject to an economy-wide greenhouse gas related obligation under the Protocol. This however
did not mean that Malta had no obligations to limit or reduce emissions from anthropogenic
activities taking place in the country.
In line with, Malta will be contributing its fair share of the EU’s unconditional commitment under
the Convention to reduce emissions by 20% below 1990 levels by 2020. This is in line with the target
inscribed in the amendments to the Kyoto Protocol (the Doha Amendments), that will be jointly
fulfilling the second commitment period with the other Union member states; therefore, emissions
from the aforementioned power plants remain subject to compliance with EU Emissions Trading
Scheme provisions, while the Effort-Sharing Decision target is the principal emissions mitigation
obligation that the country has until 2020, for all other greenhouse gas emissions.
The major point sources of greenhouse gas emissions in Malta, namely the electricity generation
plants have been, since of 2005, subject to the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, whereby they are
required to surrender allowances in respect of emissions of carbon dioxide. Emissions of
greenhouse gases not covered by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, are subject to an overall limit
under the so-called Effort-Sharing Decision. Under this decision, Malta must limit such greenhouse
gases to not more than 5% over emission levels in 2005, by 2020.
The EU is already looking towards the longer-term future, with the 2030 climate and energy
framework providing for a 40% domestic reduction target for 2030. Legislative implementation of
this goal is currently under discussion at EU level.peer-reviewe
Intersectionality and Women\u27s Participation in Peace Negotiations
The women, peace and security resolutions have consistently called for women\u27s increased participation at all levels in institutions and mechanisms for preventing, managing, and resolving conflict. Despite a long history of feminist interventions to disrupt categories of gender as a stagnant, ahistorical, or geographically consistent structure, rationales for women\u27s inclusion continue to rest on problematic narratives and assumptions. We draw on twenty-nine interviews with practitioners we asked to speak about their experiences in peace negotiations and the expectations placed on women in the processes. The problematic narratives and assumptions we identify based on these interviews and academic literature have the effect of diminishing women\u27s agency and, thus, their ability to participate in peace negotiations on their own terms. Women contribute positively to the durability of peace and the inclusion of gender provisions in agreements. Still, when women\u27s identities are constructed as one-dimensional, the benefits of women\u27s inclusion remain paradoxically a cause for celebration and a partial gain