176 research outputs found
Prosthetic graft infections involving the femoral artery
BackgroundProsthetic graft infection is a major complication of peripheral vascular surgery. We investigated the experience of a single institution over 10 years with bypass grafts involving the femoral artery to determine the incidence and risk factors for prosthetic graft infection.MethodsA retrospective cohort single-institution review of prosthetic bypass grafts involving the femoral artery from 2001 to 2010 evaluated patient demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, indications, location of bypass, type of prosthetic material, case urgency, and previous ipsilateral bypass or percutaneous interventions and evaluated the incidence of graft infections, amputations, and mortality.ResultsThere were 496 prosthetic grafts identified with a graft infection rate of 3.8% (n = 19) at a mean follow-up of 27 months. Multivariable analysis showed that redo bypass (hazard ratio [HR], 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-15.0), active infection at the time of bypass (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.9-14.2), female gender (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.6-12.7), and diabetes mellitus (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.5-14.3) were significant predictors of graft infection. Graft infection was predictive of major lower extremity amputation (HR, 9.8; 95% CI, 3.5-27.1), as was preoperative tissue loss (HR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.8-11.9). Graft infection did not predict long-term mortality; however, chronic renal insufficiency (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4), tissue loss (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9), and active infection (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4) did. Infected grafts were removed 79% of the time. Staphylococcus epidermidis (37%) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (26%) were the most common pathogens isolated.ConclusionsRedo bypass, female gender, diabetes, and active infection at the time of bypass are associated with a higher risk for prosthetic graft infection and major extremity amputation but do not confer an increased risk of mortality. Autologous vein for lower extremity bypass and endovascular interventions should be considered when feasible in high-risk patient
Changes in liver and spleen volumes after living liver donation: A report from the adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study (A2ALL)
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110585/1/lt24062.pd
Recommended from our members
Immunophenotyping and Efficacy of Low Dose ATG in Non-Sensitized Kidney Recipients Undergoing Early Steroid Withdrawal: A Randomized Pilot Study
Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is commonly used as an induction therapy in renal transplant recipients, but the ideal dosage in tacrolimus-based early steroid withdrawal protocols has not been established. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the immunophenotyping and efficacy of lower dose ATG in low immunological-risk kidney transplant recipients. In this prospective study, 45 patients were randomized (1∶1) to our standard dose ATG (total dose 3.75 mg/kg)(sATG) vs. lower dose 2.25 mg/kg (lowATG). All patients underwent early steroid withdrawal within 7 days. The primary end point was biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months. Prospective immunophenotyping of freshly isolated PBMCs was performed at baseline, 3, 6, 12 months post-transplant. The rate of acute rejection was 17% and 10% in the sATG and lowATG, respectively. Effector memory T cells, Tregs and recent thymic emigrants T cells had similar kinetics post-transplant in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found in graft survival, patient survival or infections between the two groups, though there was a non-significant increase in leukopenia (43%v s. 30%), CMV (8% vs. 0) and BK (4% vs. 0) infections in sATG group vs. lowATG. In sum, in low immunological risk kidney recipients undergoing steroid withdrawal, low dose ATG seems to be efficacious in preventing acute rejection and depleting T cells with potentially lower infectious complications. A larger study is warranted to confirm these findings. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0054840
Biliary reconstructive techniques and associated anatomic variants in adult living donor liver transplantations: The adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study experience
Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140020/1/lt24872.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140020/2/lt24872_am.pd
Motivations for consulting complementary and alternative medicine practitioners: A comparison of consumers from 1997–8 and 2005
Background: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and especially CAM
practitioners, has continued to rise in recent years. Although several motivators of CAM use have
been identified, little is known about how and if the motivations for using CAM have changed over
time. The purpose of the current study was to compare the reasons for consulting CAM
practitioners in consumers in 1997–8 and eight years later in 2005.
Methods: Surveys were displayed in CAM and conventional medicine offices and clinics in Ontario,
Canada in 1997–8 and again in 2005, and self-selected participants returned the surveys by mail.
Results: In 1997–8, 141 CAM consumers were identified from the 199 surveys returned, and 185
CAM consumers were identified from the 239 surveys returned in 2005. Five of the six CAM
motivations were more likely to be endorsed by the 2005 CAM consumers compared to the 1997–
8 CAM consumers (all p's < .0001). In 1997–8 the two top reasons for using CAM were that CAM
allowed them to take an active role in their health (51.8%), and because conventional medicine was
ineffective for their health problem (41.8%). In 2005, the treatment of the whole person (78.3%)
was the top reason for using CAM followed by taking an active role in one's health (76.5%). The
2005 consumers were less educated, had slightly more chronic health complaints, had been using
CAM for longer, and were more likely to consult chiropractors, reflexologists, and therapeutic
touch practitioners than the 1997–8 consumers. Otherwise, the socio-demographic and health
profiles of the two groups of CAM consumers were similar, as was their use of CAM.
Conclusion: Compared to consumers in 1997–8, consumers in 2005 were more likely to endorse
five of the six motivations for consulting CAM practitioners. A shift towards motivations focusing
more on the positive aspects of CAM and less on the negative aspects of conventional medicine
was also noted for the 2005 consumers. Findings suggest that CAM motivations may shift over time
as public knowledge of and experience with CAM also changes
Validity of the Postoperative Morbidity Survey after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair—a prospective observational study
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no standardised tool used to capture morbidity following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim of this prospective observational study was to validate the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) according to its two guiding principles: to only capture morbidity substantial enough to delay discharge from hospital and to be a rapid, simple screening tool. METHODS: A total of 64 adult patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair participated in the study. Following surgery, the POMS was recorded daily, by trained research staff with the clinical teams blinded, until hospital discharge or death. We modelled the data using Cox regression, accounting for the competing risk of death, with POMS as a binary time-dependent (repeated measures) internal covariate. For each day for each patient, ‘discharged’ (yes/no) was the event, with the elapsed number of days post-surgery as the time variable. We derived the hazard ratio for any POMS morbidity (score 1–9) vs. no morbidity (zero), adjusted for type of repair (endovascular versus open), age and aneurysm size. RESULTS: The hazard ratio for alive discharge with any POMS-recorded morbidity versus no morbidity was 0.130 (95 % confidence interval 0.070 to 0.243). The median time-to-discharge was 13 days after recording any POMS morbidity vs. 2 days after scoring zero for POMS morbidity. Compliance with POMS completion was 99.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: The POMS is a valid tool for capturing short-term postoperative morbidity following elective infrarenal AAA repair that is substantial enough to delay discharge from hospital. Daily POMS measurement is recommended to fully capture morbidity and allow robust analysis. The survey could be a valuable outcome measure for use in quality improvement programmes and future research
- …