The identity of crop pollinators helps target conservation for improved ecosystem services

Insect pollinated mass flowering crops are becoming more widespread and there is a need to understand which insects are primarily responsible for the pollination of these crops so conservation measures can be appropriately targeted in the face of pollinator declines. This study used field surveys in conjunction with cage manipulations to identify the relative contributions of different pollinator taxa to the pollination of two widespread flowering crops, field beans and oilseed rape. Flower visiting pollinator communities observed in the field were distinct for each crop; while field beans were visited primarily by a few bumblebee species, multiple pollinator taxa visited oilseed, and the composition of this pollinator community was highly variable spatially and temporally. Neither pollinator community, however, appears to be meeting the demands of crops in our study regions. Cage manipulations showed that multiple taxa can effectively pollinate both oilseed and field beans, but bumblebees are particularly effective bean pollinators. Combining field observations and cage manipulations demonstrated that the pollination demands of these two mass flowering crops are highly contrasting, one would benefit from management to increase the abundance of some key taxa, whilst for the other, boosting overall pollinator abundance and diversity would be more appropriate. Our findings highlight the need for crop specific mitigation strategies that are targeted at conserving specific pollinator taxa (or group of taxa) that are both active and capable of crop pollination in order to reduce pollination deficits and meet the demands of future crop production

Soil macroaggregation drives sequestration of organic carbon and nitrogen with three-year grass-clover leys in arable rotations

Conventional arable cropping with annual crops established by ploughing and harrowing degrades larger soil aggregates that contribute to storing soil organic carbon (SOC). The urgent need to increase SOC content of arable soils to improve their functioning and sequester atmospheric CO2 has motivated studies into the effects of reintroducing leys into long-term conventional arable fields. However, effects of short-term leys on total SOC accumulation have been equivocal. As soil aggregation may be important for carbon storage, we investigated the effects of arable-to-ley conversion on cambisol soil after three years of ley, on concentrations and stocks of SOC, nitrogen and their distributions in different sized water-stable aggregates. These values were benchmarked against soil from beneath hedgerow margins. SOC stocks (0–7 cm depth) rose from 20.3 to 22.6 Mg ha−1 in the arable-to-ley conversion, compared to 30 Mg ha−1 in hedgerows, but this 2.3 Mg ha−1 difference (or 0.77 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) was not significant). However, the proportion of large macroaggregates (> 2000 μm) increased 5.4-fold in the arable-to-ley conversion, recovering to similar abundance as hedgerow soils, driving near parallel increases in SOC and nitrogen within large macroaggregates (5.1 and 5.7-fold respectively). The total SOC (0–7 cm depth) stored in large macroaggregates increased from 2.0 to 9.6 Mg ha−1 in the arable-to-ley conversion, which no longer differed significantly from the 12.1 Mg ha−1 under hedgerows. The carbon therefore accumulated three times faster, at 2.53 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, in the large macroaggregates compared to the bulk soil. These findings highlight the value of monitoring large macroaggregate-bound SOC as a key early indicator of shifts in soil quality in response to change in field management, and the benefits of leys in soil aggregation, carbon accumulation, and soil functioning, providing justification for fiscal incentives that encourage wider use of leys in arable rotations

Climate-driven spatial mismatches between British orchards and their pollinators: increased risks of pollination deficits

Understanding how climate change can affect crop-pollinator systems helps predict potential geographical mismatches between a crop and its pollinators, and therefore identify areas vulnerable to loss of pollination services. We examined the distribution of orchard species (apples, pears, plums and other top fruits) and their pollinators in Great Britain, for present and future climatic conditions projected for 2050 under the SRES A1B Emissions Scenario. We used a relative index of pollinator availability as a proxy for pollination service. At present there is a large spatial overlap between orchards and their pollinators, but predictions for 2050 revealed that the most suitable areas for orchards corresponded to low pollinator availability. However, we found that pollinator availability may persist in areas currently used for fruit production, but which are predicted to provide sub-optimal environmental suitability for orchard species in the future. Our results may be used to identify mitigation options to safeguard orchard production against the risk of pollination failure in Great Britain over the next 50 years; for instance choosing fruit tree varieties that are adapted to future climatic conditions, or boosting wild pollinators through improving landscape resources. Our approach can be readily applied to other regions and crop systems, and expanded to include different climatic scenarios

The role of hedgerows in soil functioning within agricultural landscapes

Intensification of agriculture has led to major losses of hedgerows and field margins worldwide. Soil sample extraction, in situ time series of soil moisture, temperature and soil water quality analyses, annual earthworm sampling and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi sampling enabled comparison of soil functions between typical hedgerows, grass field margins, pasture and arable (mainly winter wheat) fields in a temperate, lowland setting. Mean bulk density (upper 50 cm), surface compaction and soil moisture content were significantly lower while organic matter content and porewater dissolved organic carbon concentrations were significantly greater in hedgerow soils, than margins or fields. Mean nitrate and phosphate concentrations were three and ten times larger, respectively, in soil solutions under hedgerows than arable fields while ammonium concentrations were least in arable fields. Saturated hydraulic conductivity was significantly greater under hedgerows (median = 102 mm hr−1) where it took an average of one hour longer for soils to reach maximum moisture content following rainfall, than adjacent arable (median = 3 mm hr−1) or pasture fields and margins (median = 27 mm hr−1). Hedgerow soils had a greater proportion of flow through micropores and less macropore flow than other soils. The pasture and margin soils had the largest proportion of macropore flow (>85%) and more (and larger) anecic earthworm species, such as Lumbricus terrestris which produce vertical burrows. Earthworm density, biomass and diversity were greater in pasture and margin soils, followed by hedgerow soils, and tended to be lowest in arable soils. For both total and AM fungi, hedgerow soils hosted a distinct and heterogeneous soil community, margin and pasture communities were diverse but clustered together, and arable communities formed a distinct cluster, with low inter-sample variation and significantly lowest AM fungal richness. The findings demonstrate that soils under hedgerows, which should be conserved, can provide important functions on farmland including storing organic carbon, promoting infiltration and storing runoff, increasing earthworm diversity and hosting distinct AM communities