Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Using a Ridaforolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention are often considered to be at a high bleeding risk (HBR). Drug-eluting stents have been shown to be superior to bare-metal stents in patients with HBR, even when patients were given abbreviated periods of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Short DAPT has not been evaluated with the EluNIR ridaforolimus-eluting stent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a shortened period of DAPT following implantation of the ridaforolimus-eluting stent in patients with HBR. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, multicenter, binational, single-arm, open-label trial. Patients were defined as HBR according to the LEADERS-FREE (Prospective Randomized Comparison of the BioFreedom Biolimus A9 Drug-Coated Stent versus the Gazelle Bare-Metal Stent in Patients at High Bleeding Risk) trial criteria. After percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPT was given for 1 month to patients presenting with stable angina. In patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome, DAPT was given for 1 to 3 months, at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis up to 1 year (Academic Research Consortium definite and probable). Three hundred fifteen patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled, and 56.4% presented with acute coronary syndrome; 33.7% were receiving oral anticoagulation. At 1 year, the primary end point occurred in 15 patients (4.9%), meeting the prespecified performance goal of 14.1% (P<0.0001). Stent thrombosis (Academic Research Consortium definite and probable) occurred in 2 patients (0.6%). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 and 5 bleeding occurred in 6 patients (1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed favorable results in patients with HBR who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a ridaforolimus-eluting stent and received shortened DAPT, including a low rate of ischemic events and low rate of stent thrombosis. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03877848

The impact of normal range estimated glomerular filtration rate on mortality in selected patients undergoing coronary angiography - A long-term follow-up

Background Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) predicts mortality and adverse cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease. The significance of eGFR within the normal range and its long-term effect on clinical adverse events is unknown. We examined the effect of normal range or mildly reduced eGFR on long-term mortality in a large prospective registry. Methods The study included consecutive patients undergoing clinically-driven coronary angiography who had an eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Baseline clinical characteristics were assessed, and patients were followed-up for the occurrence of all-cause mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of eGFR. Results A total of 4186 patients were recruited. Median follow-up time was 2883 days (7.9 years). Mean age was 62.0 ± 11.3 years with 77.4% males. Clinical presentation included acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. In a multivariable model adjusted for possible confounding factors, decreasing eGFR within the normal and mildly reduced range was inversely associated with long-term all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.32 for every decrease of 10 ml/min/1.732in eGFR. Compared to eGFR > 100 ml/min/1.732, there was a graded association between lower eGFR values and increased long term mortality with a HR of 1.16 (0.59-2.31) for eGFR 90-100 ml/min/1.732, HR 1.54 (0.81-2.91) for eGFR 80-90 ml/min/1.732, HR 2.62 (1.41-4.85) for eGFR 70-80 ml/min/1.732and HR 2.93 (1.58-5.41) for eGFR 60-70 ml/min/1.732. Conclusion eGFR within the normal and mildly reduced range is an independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality in selected patients undergoing clinically driven coronary angiography

Safety and efficacy of coronary sinus narrowing in chronic refractory angina: Insights from the RESOURCE study

Introduction: Refractory angina (RA) is considered the end-stage of coronary artery disease, and often has no interventional treatment options. Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) is a recent addition to the therapeutic arsenal, but its efficacy has only been evaluated on small populations. The RESOURCE registry provides further insights into this therapy. Methods: The RESOURCE is an observational, retrospective registry that includes 658 patients with RA from 20 centers in Europe, United Kingdom and Israel. Prespecified endpoints were the amelioration of anginal symptoms evaluated with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score, the rates of procedural success and complications, and MACEs as composite of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndromes, and stroke. Results: At a median follow-up of 502 days (IQR 225–1091) after CSR implantation, 39.7% of patients improved by ≥2 CCS classes (primary endpoint), and 76% by ≥1 class. Procedural success was achieved in 96.7% of attempts, with 3% of procedures aborted mostly for unsuitable coronary sinus anatomy. Any complication occurred in 5.7% of procedures, but never required bailout surgery nor resulted in intra- or periprocedural death or myocardial infarction. One patient developed periprocedural stroke after inadvertent carotid artery puncture. At the last available follow-up, overall mortality and MACE were 10.4% and 14.6% respectively. At one, three and five years, mortality rate at Kaplan-Meier analysis was 4%, 13.7%, and 23.4% respectively. Conclusions: CSR implantation is safe and reduces angina in patients with refractory angina