When is identity congruent with the self? A self-determination theory perspective

Within the identity literature, self and identity are often used as interchangeable terms. By contrast, in Self-Determination Theory (SDT; Ryan & Deci, 2003) both terms have a differentiated meaning and it is maintained that identities may vary in the extent to which they are congruent with the basic growth tendencies of the self that are fueled by the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Specifically, the level of congruence between identities and the self is said to depend on (a) the motives underlying one’s identity commitments (i.e., pressure versus volition) and (b) the content of the goals defining one’s identity (i.e., extrinsic versus intrinsic). It is argued in SDT that both the motives and the goals behind one’s identity are important for optimal functioning because of their linkage with basic need satisfaction. This chapter (a) compares the SDT view on identity development with prevailing models of identity formation, and with constructivist models of identity in particular, and (b) reviews research relevant to the idea that identities need to be congruent with the self in order to foster well-being and adjustment

The digital evolution - Secrets of success when transitioning from the analogue to the digital environment

While digital imaging promises to revolutionise radiology, switching from analogue to digital technology tends to be a gradual, evolutionary process. The decision to go digital involves more than radiologists and once the decision is made to invest in PACS, questions relating to funding and which system to purchase must be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. There are numerous potential pitfalls in installing PACS, raising the question of who should be responsible for troubleshooting and maintenance. To hear the experiences of a panel of radiologists who have made or are making the transition to the digital world, ECR and Kodak co-hosted a roundtable in Vienna in March 2004

Intimacy, identity and status: Measuring dating goals in late adolescence and emerging adulthood

Individuals' goals can direct their own social behavior and development. We extended and validated a social dating goals measure (SDGS-R) to assess identity, intimacy and status goals, and compared goals by age, gender, sexual orientation and romantic status. Participants were 121 adolescents and 249 emerging adults (age M = 20.6). The expected 3-factor structure of the SDGS-R was found and confirmed (18 items). Identity, intimacy and status goals had small correlations with each other and analyses validated the meaning and uniqueness of each goal. Participants reported more identity and intimacy goals than status goals. Intimacy goals were more prominent among older compared to teenage participants and those with a partner rather than without one. Females reported more identity dating goals than males. There was no difference in the goals of same-sex and other-sex attracted youth. The availability of the SDGS-R will allow further study of romantic development and relationship functioning.Griffith Health, School of Applied PsychologyNo Full Tex